Advertisement

The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Nuclear Waste Management

  • E. J. Nowak
Part of the Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology book series (ANST)

Abstract

This paper presents results from an experimental backfill barrier development program. The swelling, plastic flow and relative impermeability of bentonite and hectorite were observed and measured after wetting with concentrated brines. Measurements of stable values of pH > 6.5 for the interstitial brines in wetted bentonite and hectorite confirmed conditions favorable for precipitation and sorption of transuranics. Values of Kd > 2000 ml/g were measured for Pu and Am. Calculated estimates of the effectiveness of a one-foot-thick backfill barrier are presented. They show that the breakthrough of Pu and other transuranics (Kd = 2000 ml/g) can be delayed for 104 to 105 years. The breakthrough of most fission products (Kd = 200 ml/g) can be delayed for 103 to 104 years, sufficient time for them to decay to very low concentrations. A backfill barrier can contribute significantly to a radioactive waste isolation system.

Keywords

Zirconium Phosphate High Level Waste Backfill Material Sorption Measurement Waste Container 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. E. Barr and P. D. O’Brien, Personal Communication and Invention Disclosure to Sandia Laboratories and the United States Department of Energy (DOE ), (March 1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Jacobson and R. Pusch, “Deposition of High-Level Radioactive Waste Products in Bore-holes with Buffer Substance,” KBS Technisk Rapport 03, Stockholm (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. S. Guiffre, C. M. Koplick, R. L. Plum and R. Talbot, “Information Base for Waste Repository Design,” Vol. 5: Decommissioning of Underground Facilities, NUREG/CR-0495, TR-1210–1 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Allard, H. Kipatski and J. Rydberg, “Sorption of Long-lived Radionuclides in Clay and Rock. Part 1, Determination of distribution Coefficients”, KBS Technisk Rapport 55, Stockholm (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Allard, H. Kipatski and B. Torstenfelt, “Sorption ay Langlivade Radionuclider i Lera och Berg”, Del 2, KBS Technisk Rapport 98, Stockholm (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Neretnieks, “Retardation of Escapng Nuclides from a Final Repository”, KBS Technisk Rapport 30, Stockholm (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Neretnieks and C. Skagius, “Diffusivity Measurements in Wet Compacted Clay Na-lignosolfonate, Sr++, Cs+, KBS Technisk Rapport 87, Stockholm (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Neretnieks, “Transport of Oxidants and Radionuclides Through a Clay Barrier”, KBS Technisk Rapport 79, Stockholm (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. J. Nowak, “The Backfill Barrier as a Component in a Multiple Barrier Radioactive Waste Isolation System”, Sandia Laboratories Report SAND79–1109 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. J. Nowak, “The Migration of Eu Through Geologic Media,” Trans. Am. Geophysical Union 59, 1224 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. E. Grim, Clay Mineralogy ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968 ).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Pusch, “Highly Compacted Na Bentonite as Buffer Substance,” KBS Technisk Rapport 33, Stockholm (1977).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. G. Dosch, “The Use of Titanates in Decontamination of Defense Waste,” Sandia Laboratories Report SAND78–0710 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Fried, A. M. Friedman, D. Cohen, J. J. Hines and R. G. Strickert, “The Migration of Long-lived Radioactive Processing Wastes in Selected Rocks,” Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-78–46 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. A. Couture, M. G. Seitz, and S. Steindler, “Adsorption of Iodate by Hematite,” presented at the ANS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia (June 1979).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Akatsu, R. Ono, K. Tsukuechi and H. Uchiyama, “Radiochemical Study of Adsorption Behavior of Inorganic Ions on Zirconium Phosphate, Silica Gel and Charcoal,” J. Nucl. Sci, Techn. 2, 141 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Vermeulen, G. Klein, and N. K. Hiester, “Adsorption and Ion Exchange,” Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (5th Edition, R. H. Perry and C. H. Chilton, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York 1973 ).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Helfferich, Ion Exchange ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford Press, London, 1956 )Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Y. Borg, R. Stone, H. B. Levy, and L. D. Ramspot, “Information Pertinent to the Migration of Radionuclides in Groundwater at the Nevada Test Site, Part 1, Review and Analysis of Existing Information,” Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL-52078 Part 1 (1976).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. K. Kibbe and A. L. Boch, “Technical Support for GEIS: Radioactive Waste Isolation in Geologic Formations,” Vol. 21 Groundwater Movement and Nuclide Transport, Office of Water Isolation Report Y/OWI/TM-36/21 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Nowak
    • 1
  1. 1.Sandia LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations