Uranium and Thorium Minerals: Natural Analogues for Radioactive Waste Forms

  • Richard F. Haaker
  • Rodney C. Ewing
Part of the Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology book series (ANST)


SYNROC (1) and Supercalcine (2) are proposed crystalline radio-waste forms that may be regarded as highly radioactive “artificial rocks.” In these crystalline radioactive waste forms, rare-earth elements (REE), U and transuranium (TRU) elements are strongly partitioned into five phases. These phases have U- and Th-bearing mineral analogues. In SYNROC, the actinide bearing phases are perovskite (CaTiO3) and zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7). “BAIT” (BaAl2Fe8Ti13O38) is a phase which may occur in SYNROC formulations for wastes with large amounts of Fe and Al. “BAIT” may be structurally similar to davidite(Fe6Ti15036). Supercalcine actinide phases include silicate-apatite (CaREE4(SiO4)30), monazite ((Ce, La) PO4 and uraninite (UO2+x). The purpose of this paper is to summarize the relevant geologic literature on these phases. Emphasis is given to: (1) solid-solution chemistry, (2) mode of occurrence, (3) alteration and (4) radiation damage effects. A special effort is made to identify stable and unstable mineral associations, as this may be important if hydrothermal conditions occur in the waste repository. The idea of devising a radioactive waste form which is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its repository is appealing but impossible. This is apparent from the conditions for equilibrium between two or more phases, namely, for each chemical species, i, the chemical potential, U., must in each phase be equal.


Wall Rock Artificial Rock Nepheline Syenite Alkali Feldspar Waste Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. E. Ringwood and S. Kesson, “Immobilization of High Level Nuclear Wastes in Ceramic Materials — A New Approach,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management, American Ceramic Society, Cincinnati, April 30-May 2 (1979) (in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. J. McCarthy, “High-Level Waste Ceramics: Materials Considerations and Product Characterization,” Nuclear Technology 32, 92 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. A. Gluschchenko and A. F. Li, “Britholite from an Alkaline Massif in the Northern Baikal Area,” Nauch. Tr. Irkutsk. Gos. Nauch.-Issled. Inst. Redk. Tvsvet. Met. 14, 100 (1966) (Russ) [Chemical Abstracts 67:119051r (1967)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clifford Frondel, “Systematic Mineralogy of Uranium and Thorium,” Geological Survey Bulletin, 1064, (1958).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. B. Jensen, “Distribution Patterns of Rare Earth Elements in Cerianite,” Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 47, 1 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. D. Schuiling and B. W. Vink, “Stability Relations of Some Titanium Minerals (Sphene, Perovskite, Rutile, Anatase),” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 2399 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. I. Lebedev and 0. M. Rimskaya-Korsakova, “Ilmenitization of Perovskite,” Doklady Akad. Nauk SSR 66, 257–60 (1949). [Chemical Abstracts 43, 7379 (1949)]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. A. Gorzhevskaya and G. A. Sidorenko, “Loparite Alteration Products,” Mineral. Sb. (Lvov) 23, 270 (1969) (Russ). [Chemical Abstracts 73, 89938Q (1970)]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. A. Vlasov, ed., Mineralogy of Rare Elements, Vol. II, ( Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1966 ).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. D. Busche, M. Prinz, K. Keil and G. Kurat, “Lunar Zirkelite: A Uranium Bearing Phase,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 14, 313 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. G. Bulakh, G. A. I1’inskii and A. A. Kukharenko, “Zirkelite from deposits of the Kola Peninsula,” Zapiski Vesesoyuz. Mineral. Obschchestva 89, 261 (1960) [Chemical Abstracts 55, 9167 (1961)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. S. Blake and G. F. Herbert Smith, “On Varieties of Zirkelite from Ceylon,” Mineral. Mag. 16, 309 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Van Wambeke, “A Second Occurrence of Nonmetamict Davidite,” Mineral Deposita (Berl.) 3, 178 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard F. Haaker
    • 1
  • Rodney C. Ewing
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations