Advertisement

What are the True Building Blocks of Matter

  • A. O. Barut

Abstract

“Can high-energy physics be too easy?” asked a recent editorial in “Nature.”1) At present, the picture mostly used in high-energy phenomenology is becoming admittedly very complicated. Besides leptons (which we see), one introduces families of “quarks,” each with different colours, then the so-called “gluons,” which are the gauge vector mesons binding the quarks, then there are the so-called “Higgs particles,” which give masses to some of the vector mesons (all of which are not seen in the laboratory). One is already beginning to talk about a second generation of more fundamental and simpler objects for these quarks and gluons etc., even though these first generations of “basic” objects have not been seen. This type of framework seems to create more problems than it solves.2)

Keywords

Pair Production Vector Meson Lepton Number Anomalous Magnetic Moment Lepton Pair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Nature editorial, 273, 479 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    V.F. Weisskopf, Physikalische Blatter 35, 3–12 (1979), cf. Sec. 5, Unsolved problems;Google Scholar
  3. M. Gell-Mann [Summary talk, Jerusalem Einstein Centennial Symposium, March 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 3).
    See the historical account, L.M. Brown, “The idea of neutrino,” Phys. Today, 31, 23 (September 1978).Google Scholar
  5. 4).
    A.O. Barut, in Structure of Matter, Proc. Rutherford Centennial Conference, 1971, Ed. B.G. Wybourne (Univ. of Canterbury Press, 1972 ), p. 69.Google Scholar
  6. 5).
    A.O. Barut and J. Kraus, Phys. Letters 59B, 175 (1975); J. Math. Phys. 17, 506 (1976).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6).
    A.O. Barut and J. Kraus, Phys. Rev. D16, 161 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 7).
    A.O. Barut and R. Raczka, Acta Phys. Polon., B10, 687–703 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 8).
    A.O. Barut and G. Strobel, to be published.Google Scholar
  10. 9).
    C. Piron and F. Reuse, Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 146 (1978);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Reuse, Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 157 (1978).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 9).
    C. Piron and F. Reuse, Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 146 (1978);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. F. Reuse, Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 157 (1978).Google Scholar
  14. 11).
    R.W. Gurney, Nature 123, 565 (1929).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12).
    A.O. Barut, Phys. Letters 73B, 310 (1978).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13).
    A.O. Barut and J.P. Crawford, Phys. Letters 82B, 233 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14).
    S.L. Glashow, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 8, 105 (1978).Google Scholar
  18. 15).
    A.O. Barut, “Leptons as ‘quarks’,” University of Geneva preprint UGVA-DPT 1978/08–175, and in Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Group Theory and Mathematical Physics, September 1978, Eds. A. Bohm and E. Takasugi (Springer Lecture Notes in Physics, 1979), Vol. 94, 490–98 (1979); Surveys in High Energy Physic, Vol. 1, No. 2, Jan. 1980 issue.Google Scholar
  19. 16).
    L. Berkelman, in Orbis Scientiae Proceedings;Coral Gables (1979).Google Scholar
  20. 17).
    C.H. Townes and A.L. Schawlov, in Microwave Spectroscopy (McGraw Hill, 1955 ), p. 300.Google Scholar
  21. 18).
    D.M. Dennison and G.E. Uhlenbeck, Phys.. Rev. 41, 313 (1932).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 19).
    When one thinks back to these days, one finds that it is really remarkable how unwilling people were to postulate a new particle. This applies both to theoretical and experimental workers. It seems that they would look for any explanation rather than postulate a new particle. It needed the most obvious and unassailable evidence to be presented before them before they were reluctantly forced to postulate a new theory. The climate has completely changed since these early days. New particles are now being postulated and proposed continually, in large numbers. There are a hundred or more in current use today. People are only too keen to publish evidence for a new particle, whether this evidence comes from experiment or from ill-established theoretical ideas.“ (P.A.M. Dirac. in The Development of Quantum Theory (Gordon and Breach, 1971), p. 60.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. O. Barut
    • 1
  1. 1.International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations