Advertisement

The Tarasoff Case and the Controversy over Its Therapeutic Implications

  • David B. Wexler
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 4)

Abstract

By now, the case name Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California 1 has become a household word in American mental health law circles. Tarasoff’s familiarity is no doubt attributable in part to the fact that the case was twice heard by the Supreme Court of California.2 More important, however, is the rule of law established in the opinion.

Keywords

Supra Note Family Therapy Severe Mental Illness Interpersonal Violence Potential Victim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 7.
    Roth & Meisel, Dangerousness, Confidentiality, and the Duty to Warn, 134 Amer. J. Psychiatry 508, 509 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. Note, Where the Public Peril Begins: A Survey of Psychotherapists to Determine the Effects of Tarasoff, 31 Stanford L. Rev. 165 (1978) (hereinafter cited as Stanford Law Review Note).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 8.
    Cocozza & Steadman, The Failure of Psychiatric Predictions of Dangerousness: Clear and Convincing Evidence, 29 Rutgers L. Rev. 1048 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Stone, The Tarasoff Decisions: Suing Psychotherapists to Safeguard Society, 90 Harvard L. Rev. 358 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurevitz, Tarasoff: Protective Privilege Versus Public Peril, 134 Amer. J. Psychiatry 289 (1977).Google Scholar
  6. 27.
    Tardiff, A Survey of Psychiatrists in Boston and Their Work with Violent Patients, 131 Amer. J. Psychiatry 1008, 1009-1010 (1974) (few persons from high-crime areas seen as patients).Google Scholar
  7. MacDonald, The Threat to Kill, 120 Amer. J. Psychiatry 125 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. MacDonald, Homicidal Threats, 124 Amer. J. Psychiatry 475 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. 33.
    Wolfgang & Singer, Victim Categories of Crime, 69 J. Crim. Law Criminol. 379 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 36.
    Skodol & Karusu, Emergency Psychiatry and the Assaultive Patient, 135 Amer. J. Psychiatry 202 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. Lion, Bach-Y-Rita, & Ervin, Violent Patients in the Emergency Room, 125 Amer. J. Psychiatry 1706 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. 45.
    Rosenhan, On Being Sane in Insane Places, 179 Science 250 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 69.
    Comment, A Therapist’s Duty to Potential Victims: A Nonthreatening View of Tarasoff, 1 Law And Human Beh. 309 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 72.
    Svalastoga, Homicide and Social Contact in Denmark, 62 Amer. J. Soc. 37 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 75.
    Lanzkron, Murder and Insanity: A Survey, 19 Amer. J. Psychiatry 754, 755-756 (1963).Google Scholar
  16. 86.
    Harbin, Episodic Dyscontrol and Family Dynamics, 134 Amer. J. Psychiatry 1113 (1977).Google Scholar
  17. Simon, Type A, Ab, B Murderers: Their Relationship to the Victims and to the Criminal Justice System, 5 Bull. Amer. Acad. Psychiatry And The Law 344 (1977).Google Scholar
  18. 88.
    Wolfgang, Victim Precipitated Criminal Homicide, 48 J. Crim. Law, Criminology, And Police Science 1, 11 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 111.
    Herjanic & Meyer, Psychiatric Illness in Homicide Victims, 133 Amer. J. Psychiatry 691 (1976).Google Scholar
  20. 116.
    Shepherd, Morbid Jealousy: Some Clinical and Social Aspects of a Psychiatric Symptom, 107 J. Mental Sci. 687, 698 (1961).Google Scholar
  21. 122.
    Gobert, Victim Precipitation, 77 Colum. L. R. 511 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 125.
    Comment, Battered Wives Who Kill: Double Standard Out of Court, Single Standard In?, 2 Law And Human Beh. 133 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 138.
    Grosser & Paul, Ethical Issues in Family Group Therapy, 34 Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 875 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 143.
    Cohen, Freedman, Englehardt, & Margolis, Family Interaction Patterns, Drug Treatment, and Change in Social Aggression, 19 Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 50 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 150.
    Friedman, Legal Regulation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Mental Institutions and Prisons, 17 Ariz. L. Rev. 39 (1975).Google Scholar
  26. 192.
    Note, Psychotherapists’ Liability for Extrajudicial Breaches of Confidentiality, 18 Ariz. L. Rev. 1061 (1976).Google Scholar
  27. 202.
    Wexler, Victimology and Mental Health Law: An Agenda, 66 Va. L. Rev. 681 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Wexler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations