Skip to main content

The Administration of Psychiatric Justice

A Case Study

  • Chapter
Mental Health Law

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology ((PILP,volume 4))

  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

As noted in Chapter 1, my students and I, during the 1970–71 academic year, conducted a case study of the administration of therapeutic justice in Arizona. Since at the time of the study that justice system was very much under the control of physicians and psychiatrists, the study was in essence one of “psychiatric justice,” and will be refered to as such. The year-long effort required extensive field work, which involved observing many commitment hearings in Phoenix (the state capitol, the state’s largest city, and the county seat of Maricopa County) and Tucson (the state’s second largest city and county seat of Pima County), examining court files, visiting the Arizona State Hospital and various county hospitals, and conducting interviews with physicians, lawyers, and judges in every Arizona county.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Shuman, Hegland, & Wexler, Arizona’s Mental Health Services Act: An Overview and an Analysis of Proposed Amendments, 19 Ariz. L. Rev. 313 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scheff, Social Conditions for Rationality: How Urban and Rural Courts Deal with the Mentally Ill, 7 Amer. Behavioral Scientist 21 (Mar., 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prefender, Probate Court Attitudes toward Involuntary Hospitalization: A Field Study, 5 J. Fam. L. 139, 150 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, The Function of the Attorney and the Commitment of the Mentally Ill, 44 Tex. L. Rev. 424 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Note, The Role of Counsel in the Civil Commitment Process: A Theoretical Framework, 84 Yale L. J. 1540 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poythress, Psychiatric Expertise in Civil Commitment: Training Attorneys to Cope with Expert Testimony, 2 L. & Human Beh. 1 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Denzen & Spitzer, Patient Entry Patterns in Varied Psychiatric Settings, 50 Mental Hygeine 257 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Note, The New York Mental Health Information Service: A New Approach to Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill, 67 Colum. L. Rev. 672 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szasz, Hospital Refusal to Release Mental Patients, 9 Clev.-Mar. L. Rev. 220 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ross, Commitment of the Mentally III: Problems of Law and Policy, 57 Mich. L. Rev. 945, 964, (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wexler, D.B. (1981). The Administration of Psychiatric Justice. In: Mental Health Law. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3827-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3827-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics