The Administration of Psychiatric Justice
As noted in Chapter 1, my students and I, during the 1970–71 academic year, conducted a case study of the administration of therapeutic justice in Arizona. Since at the time of the study that justice system was very much under the control of physicians and psychiatrists, the study was in essence one of “psychiatric justice,” and will be refered to as such. The year-long effort required extensive field work, which involved observing many commitment hearings in Phoenix (the state capitol, the state’s largest city, and the county seat of Maricopa County) and Tucson (the state’s second largest city and county seat of Pima County), examining court files, visiting the Arizona State Hospital and various county hospitals, and conducting interviews with physicians, lawyers, and judges in every Arizona county.
KeywordsRural County Civil Commitment Detention Facility County Jail Public Defender
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Shuman, Hegland, & Wexler, Arizona’s Mental Health Services Act: An Overview and an Analysis of Proposed Amendments, 19 Ariz. L. Rev. 313 (1977).Google Scholar
- 3.Scheff, Social Conditions for Rationality: How Urban and Rural Courts Deal with the Mentally Ill, 7 Amer. Behavioral Scientist 21 (Mar., 1964).Google Scholar
- 13.Prefender, Probate Court Attitudes toward Involuntary Hospitalization: A Field Study, 5 J. Fam. L. 139, 150 (1965).Google Scholar
- 47.Cohen, The Function of the Attorney and the Commitment of the Mentally Ill, 44 Tex. L. Rev. 424 (1966).Google Scholar
- 58.Denzen & Spitzer, Patient Entry Patterns in Varied Psychiatric Settings, 50 Mental Hygeine 257 (1966).Google Scholar
- 69.Szasz, Hospital Refusal to Release Mental Patients, 9 Clev.-Mar. L. Rev. 220 (1960).Google Scholar