Advertisement

The Use of Isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate as a Potential Contraceptive

Control of Meiotic Maturation
  • Daniel Szöllösi
  • Nicole Crozet
Part of the Biochemical Endocrinology book series (BIOEND)

Abstract

The most successful contraceptive practices, exclusive of the physical methods, affect the complex hypothalamic—hypophyseal—gonadal feedback systems. The intervention could theoretically occur at any point of this feedback loop. Steroid supplementation reduces the level of gonadotrophin-secretory activity and via it gonadal steroid production. The inconveniences of this method to the user and the user’s undesirable physiological responses to this method have become known during recent decades of contraceptive practice (for a review, see Régulation de la Fécondité,Vol. 83, INSERM, Paris, 1979). Steroid-based contraceptives certainly influence gamete production and, as well, the hormone-secretory activity of the gonads themselves and various protein hormones of the central nervous system.

Keywords

Nuclear Envelope Follicular Fluid Mouse Oocyte Nuclear Body Meiotic Spindle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinster, R.L., 1971, In vitro culture of the embryo, in: Pathways to Conception (A. I. Sherman, ed.), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, D.L., and Bouck, G.B., 1974, Microtubule biogenesis and cell shape in Ochromonas. III. Effects of the herbicidal mitotic inhibitor isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate on shape and flagellum regeneration, J. Cell Biol. 61: 514–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, M.C., 1955, The maturation of rabbit oocytes in culture and their maturation, activation, fertilization and subsequent development in the fallopian tubes, J. Exp. Zool. 128: 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chouinard, L.A., 1973, An electron-microscope study of the extranucleolar bodies during growth of the oocyte in the prebubertal mouse, J. Cell Sci. 12: 55–70.Google Scholar
  5. Chouinard, L.A., 1975, A light-and electron-microscope study of the oocyte nucleus during development of the antral follicle in the prebubertal mouse, J. Cell Sci. 17: 589–615.Google Scholar
  6. Coss, R.A., and Pickett-Heaps, J.D., 1974, Effects of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate on the green alga Oedogonium cardiacum. I. Cell division, J. Cell Biol. 63: 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coss, R.A., Bloodgood, R.A., Brower, D.L., Pickett-Heaps, J.D., and McIntosh, J.R., 1975, Studies on the mechanism of action of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate, Exp. Cell Res. 92: 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crozet, N., and Szöllösi, D., 1979, The effects of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate on meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes, Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 19: 1131–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donahue, R.P., 1968, Maturation of the mouse oocyte in vitro. I. Sequence and timing of nuclear progression, J. Exp. Zool. 169: 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elbers, P.J., Ververgaest, P.H.J.T., and Demel, R., 1965, Tricomplex fixation of phospholipids, J. Cell Biol. 23: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hepler, P.K., and Jackson, W.T., 1969, Isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate affects spindle microtubule orientation in dividing endosperm cells of Haemanthus Katherinae Baker, J. Cell Sci. 5: 727–743.Google Scholar
  12. Mann, J.D., Cota-Robles, E., Yung, K.H., and Haid, H., 1967, Phenylurethane herbicides: Inhibitors of changes in metabolic state. I. Botanical aspects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 138: 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mergulis, L., and Banerjee, D., 1969, Effects of mitotic spindle inhibitors on regenerating cilia of Stentor coeruleus, J. Protozool. 16: 75.Google Scholar
  14. Moore, G.P.M., Lintern-Moore, S., Peters, H., and Faber, M., 1974, RNA synthesis in the mouse oocyte, J. Cell Biol. 60: 416–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nasta, A., and Gunther E., 1973, Mitotic disturbances by application of carbamate herbicides on Allium cepa and Hordeum vulgare, Biol. Zentralbl. 92: 27–36.Google Scholar
  16. Oliver, J.M., Krawiec, J.A., and Berlin R.D., 1978, A carbamate herbicide causes microtubule and microfilament disruption and nuclear fragmentation in fibroblasts, Exp. Cell Res. 116: 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palombi, F., and Viron, A., 1977, Nuclear cytochemistry of mouse oogenesis. I. Changes in extranucleolar ribonucleoprotein components through meiotic prophase, J. Ultras-tract. Res. 61: 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sorensen, R.A., 1973, Cinemicrography of mouse oocyte maturation utilizing Nomarski differential-interference microscopy, Am. J. Anat. 136: 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Szöllösi, D., Calarco, P., and Donahue, R.Y., 1972, Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes, J. Cell Sci. 11: 521–541.Google Scholar
  20. Thibault, C., 1972, Final stages of mammalian oocyte maturation, in: Oogenesis ( J.D.Biggers and A.W. Schuetz eds.), pp. 397–411, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  21. Timson, J., 1970, Effect of the herbicides propham and chlorpropham on the rate of mitosis of human lymphocytes in culture, Pestic. Sci. 1: 191–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Szöllösi
    • 1
  • Nicole Crozet
    • 1
  1. 1.Station Centrale de Physiologie AnimaleINRAJouy-en-JosasFrance

Personalised recommendations