Advertisement

Ionic Conductivity in Low-Temperature Molten Salts and Concentrated Solutions

  • Stuart I. Smedley

Abstract

The Debye-Hückel theory of electrolyte solutions, based on the primitive continuum model, becomes invalid for aqueous 1: 1 electrolyte solutions at about 0.001 mol dm-3.(1) Above this concentration the ionic atmosphere of an ion, i.e., its electrical image in the solution, is closer to the ion than its nearest neighbors—a physical absurdity. However, the modified Debye-Hückel theory, with a suitable value of a fits the activity coefficient data up to about 0.1 mol dm-3.(3) Fuoss and Onsager, using a similar argument to that above, consider that their 1957 conductivity equation will be valid up to about 0.02 mol dm-3.(3) Above this concentration the electrical image of an ion (equal to unit charge) approaches closer than 7a, and large fluctuations would result in the potential at the central ion on the close approach of a near neighbor. This would invalidate a fundamental postulate of the Debye-Hückel theory, that the potential at the surface of the ion is related, by Poisson’s equation, to the average charge density surrounding the ion. However, Fuoss’s new theory (Chapter 2) is limited to 0.09 mol dm-3 for aqueous 1: 1 electrolytes and 0.002 mol dm-3 for 2: 1 electrolytes. (4) At these concentrations it becomes impossible to define uniquely an ion pair because three ion interactions become significant. In this theory ions that come within R > a are counted as paired and are excluded from the calculation of long-range effects.

Keywords

Ionic Liquid Molten Salt Configurational Entropy Electrical Image Free Volume Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. S. Harned and B. B. Owen, The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutions, Reinhold, New York (1943).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes, Electrolyte Solutions, Butterworths, London (1966).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Fuoss and L. Onsager, Conductance of unassociated electrolytes, J. Phys. Chem. 61, 668–682 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. M. Fuoss, Conductance-concentration function for the paired ion model, J. Phys. Chem. 82, 2427–2440 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. E. Goldsack, R. Franchetto, and A. Franchetto, Solvation effects on the conductivity of concentrated electrolyte solutions, Can. J. Chem. 54, 2953–2966 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. B. Gancy and S. B. Brummer, The effect of solution concentration on the high-pressure coefficient of ionic conductance, J. Phys. Chem. 73, 2429–2436 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. S. Brun and H. Høiland, Pressure dependence of the electric conductance of aqueous solutions of LiCl, KCl and (CH3)4NCl, Electrochim. Acta 21, 51–57 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. U. Hwang, H. D. Ludemann, and D. Hartmann, Die elektrische Leitfahigkeit konzentrierter wassriger Alkalihalogenidlosungen bei hohen Drucken und Temperaturen, High Temperatures-High Pressures 2, 651–669 (1970).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. A. Lown and H. R. Thirsk, Proton transfer conductance in aqueous solution, Trans. Faraday Soc. 67, 132–152 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. K. Fellows, Conductance measurements on aqueous solutions over extended ranges of concentration and temperature, Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand (1971).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. F. Grantham and S. J. Yosim, Negative temperature coefficients of electrical conductance in molten salts, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 1192–1198 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. A. Angell and R. D. Bressel, Fluidity and conductance in aqueous electrolyte solutions, I, J. Phys. Chem. 76, 3244–3253 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. Angell and E. J. Sare, Glass-forming composition regions and glass transition temperatures for aqueous electrolyte solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1058–1068 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. F. Wishaw and R. H. Stokes, The diffusion coefficients and conductances of some concentrated electrolyte solutions at 25°C, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 76, 2065–2071 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Falkenhagen, M. Leist, and G. Kelbg, Theory of the conductivity of strong, nonassociative electrolytes at higher concentrations, Ann. Physik, 6 (11), 51–59 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N-P. Yao and D. N. Bennion, Transport behaviour in dimethyl sulfoxide, III: Conductance-viscosity behaviour of tetra-N-amylammonium thiocyanate from infinite dilution to molten salt at 55°C, J. Phys. Chem. 75, 3586–3591 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. P. T. Tomkins, E. Andalaft, and G. J. Janz, Conductance, density and viscosity of Nal in anhydrous acetonitrile at 25°C, Trans. Faraday Soc. 65, 1906–1911 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. C. Kenausis, E. C. Evers, and C. A. Kraus, Mechanisms underlying the equilibrium reactions between ions and ion pairs in solutions of electrolytes, I, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S. 48, 121–128 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. H. Cohen and D. Turnbull, Molecular transport in liquid and glasses, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1164–1169(1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Adam and J. H. Gibbs, On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139–146 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. A. Angell, Free volume model for transport in fused salts: Electrical conductance in glass-forming nitrate melts, J. Phys. Chem. 68, 1917–1919 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. A. Angell, Free volume-entropy interpretation of the electrical conductance of aqueous electrolyte solutions in the concentration range 2–20 N, J. Phys. Chem. 70, 3988–3997 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. T. Moynihan, C. R. Smalley, C. A. Angell, and E. J. Sare, Conductance, viscosity, density, proton magnetic resonance spectra and glass transition temperatures of calcium nitrate tetrahydrate-cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate melts, J. Phys. Chem. 73, 2287–2293 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. Islam and K. Ismail, Temperature and composition dependence of transport properties of cobalt (II) chloride-calcium nitrate tetrahydrate melts, J. Phys. Chem. 80, 1929–1933 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. T. Moynihan, The temperature dependence of transport properties of ionic liquids. The conductance and viscosity of calcium nitrate tetrahydrate and sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate, J. Phys. Chem. 70, 3399–3403 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. A. Angell, On the importance of the metastable liquid state and glass transition phenomenon to transport and structure studies in ionic liquids: I. Transport properties, J. Phys. Chem. 70, 2793–2803 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. I. Smedley and I. Torrie, Transport in molten CaCl2·5·99,5·33H2O under pressure, J. Phys. Chem. 82, 238–241 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. G. Chang and D. E. Irish, Raman and infrared spectral study of magnesium nitrate-water systems, J. Phys. Chem. 77, 52–57 (1973)Google Scholar
  29. (b).
    M. Peleg, A Raman spectroscopic investigation of the magnesium nitrate-water system, J. Phys. Chem. 76, 1019–1025 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (c).
    R. F. Hester and R. A. Plane, Raman spectrophotometry study of complex formation in aqueous solutions of calcium nitrate, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 411–414 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 29.
    E. J. Sare, C. T. Moynihan, and C. A. Angell, Proton magnetic resonance chemical shifts and the hydrogen bond in concentrated aqueous electrolyte solutions, J. Phys. Chem. 77, 1869–1876 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 30.
    P. S. Leung and G. J. Safford, A neutron inelastic scattering investigation of the diffusion kinetics of H2O molecules and hydration complexes in concentrated ionic solutions, J. Solution Chem. 2, 525–547 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 31.
    W. Kauzmann, The nature of the glassy state and the behavior of liquids at low temperatures, Chem. Rev. 43, 219–256 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 32.
    C. A. Angell and C. T. Moynihan, in Molten Salts ( G. Mamontov, ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York (1969), p. 315.Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    C. A. Angell and J. C. Tucker, Heat capacities and fusion entropies of the tetrahydrates of calcium nitrate, cadmium nitrate and magnesium acetate, J. Phys. Chem. 78, 278–281 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 34.
    C. A. Angell and C. T. Moynihan, in Molten Salts ( G. Mamontov, ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York (1969), p. 346.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    C. A. Angell and K. J. Rao, Configurational excitations in condensed matter, and the “bond lattice” model for the liquid-glass transition, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 470–481 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 36.
    L. Pickston, S. I. Smedley, and G. Woodall, The compressibility and electrical conductivity of concentrated aqueous calcium nitrate solutions to 6 kbar and 150°C, J. Phys. Chem. 81, 581–586 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 37.
    C. A. Angell, L. J. Pollard, and W. Strauss, Transport in ionic liquids under pressure, I: Concentrated calcium nitrate-water and magnesium chloride-water solutions, J. Solution Chem. 1, 517–530 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 38.
    C. A. Angell, L. J. Pollard, and W. Strauss, Transport in molten salts under pressure, I: Glass-forming nitrate melts, J. Chem Phys. 50, 2694–2705 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    A. F. M. Barton and R. J. Speedy, Simultaneous conductance and volume measurements on molten salts at high pressure, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. I 70, 506–527 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 40.
    R. O. Davies and G. O. Jones, Thermodynamics and kinetic properties of glasses, Adv. Phys. 2, 370–410 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 41.
    M. Goldstein, Some thermodynamic aspects of the glass transition: Free volume, entropy and enthalpy theories, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 3369–3374 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 42.
    C. A. Angell and W. Sichina, Thermodynamics of the glass transition: Empirical aspects; Part II. The glass transition: thermodynamic and kinetic aspects, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 279, 53–67 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 43.
    F. S. Howell, R. A. Bose, P. B. Macedo, and C. T. Moynihan, Electrical relaxation in a glass-forming molten salt, J. Phys. Chem. 78, 639–648 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 44.
    C. A. Angell, Oxide glasses in light of the “ideal glass” concept: II, Interpretations by reference to simple ionic glass behavior, J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 51, 125–134 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 45.
    J. H. Ambrus, C. T. Moynihan, and P. B. Macedo, Conductivity relaxation in a concentrated aqueous electrolyte solution, J. Phys. Chem. 76, 3287–3294 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 46.
    C. T. Moynihan, N. Balitactac, L. Boone, and T. A. Litovitz, Comparison of shear and conductivity relaxation times for concentrated lithium chloride solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 3013–3019 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 47.
    H. Tweer, J. H. Simmons, and P. B. Macedo, Application of the environmental relaxation model to the temperature dependence of the viscosity, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 1952–1959 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart I. Smedley
    • 1
  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations