Psychologists have always been enchanted by physics. The exactness and beauty of physical experiments and the resulting mathematical formulas have seemed to psychologists to be the prototype of any scientific research. To be scientific has often been considered synonymous with imitation of the methods and manners of physical research.


Mathematical Concept Psychological Theory Cognitive Structure Theory Construction Social Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barker, r. G., Dembo, T., & Lewin, K. Frustration and regression: An experiment with young children. Univer. Iowa Stud. Child Welf., 1941, 18, 1–314.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. F. On the use of mathematics in psychological theory. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 7–15, 77–90.Google Scholar
  3. Cassirer, E. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Berlin: Cassirer, 1910.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, M. R. Reason and nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1931.Google Scholar
  5. Dembo, T. Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem. Psychol. Forsch., 1931, 15, 1–144.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, M. Field theory in social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1954.Google Scholar
  7. Estes, W. K., & others. Modern learning theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1954.Google Scholar
  8. Fajans, S. Erfolg, Ausdauer und Aktivität beim Säugling und Kleinkind. Psychol. Forsch., 1933, 17, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feigl, H. Principles and problems of theory construction in psychology. In W. Dennis (Ed.), Current trends in psychological theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  10. Garrett, H. E. Lewin’s “topological” psychology: An evaluation. Psychol. Rev., 1939, 46, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilgard, E. R. Theories of learning. (2nd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956.Google Scholar
  12. Hodges, H. A. Wilhelm Dilthey: An introduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949.Google Scholar
  13. Hoppe, F. Erfolg und Misserfolg. Psychol. Forsch., 1930, 14, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keredjarto, von B. Vorlesungen über Topologie. Berlin: Springer, 1923.Google Scholar
  15. Leeper, R. W. Lewin’s topological and vector psychology. Eugene, Ore.: University of Oregon Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  16. Lewin, K. Die psychische Tätigkeit bei der Hemmung von Willensvorgängen und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. Z. Psychol., 1917, 77, 212–247.Google Scholar
  17. Lewin, K. Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. Psychol. Forsch., 1921, 1, 191–302; 1922, 2, 65–140.Google Scholar
  18. Lewin, K. Der Begriff der Genese in Physik, Biologie, und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Berlin: Bornträger, 1922.Google Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. Forsatz, Wille, und Bedürfnis. Berlin: Springer, 1926.Google Scholar
  20. Lewin, K. Gesetz und Experiment in der Psychologie. Symposium, 1927, 1, 375–421.Google Scholar
  21. Lewin, K. Die Entwicklung der experimentellen Willenspsychologie und die Psychotherapie. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1929.Google Scholar
  22. Lewin, K. Vectors, cognitive processes, and Mr. Tolman’s criticism. J. gen. Psychol., 1933, 8, 318–345.Google Scholar
  23. Lewin, K. Environmental forces. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  24. Lewin, K. A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.Google Scholar
  25. Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewin, K. The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Univer. Iowa Contr. psychol. Theory, 1938, 1, No. 4, 1–247.Google Scholar
  27. Lewin, K. Formalization and progress in psychology. Univer. Iowa Contr. psychol. Theory, 1940, 3, 7–42.Google Scholar
  28. Lewin, K. Field theory of learning. Yearb. nat. Soc. Stud. Educ., 1942, 41, Part II, 215–242.Google Scholar
  29. Lewin, K. Defining the “field at a given time.” Psychol. Rev., 1943, 50, 292–310.Google Scholar
  30. Lewin, K. Constructs in psychology and psychological ecology. Univer. Iowa Stud. Child Welf., 1944, 20, 1–29.Google Scholar
  31. Lewin, K. Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1946.Google Scholar
  32. Lewin, K. Cassirer’s philosophy of science and the social sciences. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. Evanston, 111.: Living Philosophies, 1949.Google Scholar
  33. Lewin, K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper, 1951.Google Scholar
  34. Lippitt, R. An experimental study of the effect of democratic and authoritarian group atmospheres. Univer. Iowa Stud. Child Welf., 1940, 16, 3, 44–195.Google Scholar
  35. London, I. O. Psychologists’ misuse of the auxiliary concepts of physics and mathematics. Psychol. Rev., 1944, 51, 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacCall, S. H. A comparative study of the systems of Lewin and Koffka with specific reference to memory phenomena. Contr. psychol. Theory, Duke University Press, 1939, 2, No. 1.Google Scholar
  37. Marrow, A. J. Goal tension and recall. J. gen. Psychol, 1938, 19, 3–35, 37–64.Google Scholar
  38. Ovsiankina, M. Die Wiederaufnahme von unterbrochener Handlungen. Psychol. Forsch., 1928, 11, 302–389.Google Scholar
  39. Sierpinski, W. Introduction to general topology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  40. Spence, K. W. The nature of theory construction in contemporary psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1944, 51, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spence, K. W. Theoretical interpretations of learning. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951.Google Scholar
  42. White, R. K. The case for the Tolman-Lewin interpretation of learning. Psychol. Rev., 1943, 50, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolman, B. Chance: A philosophical study. Tarbitz, Hebrew Univer. Quart. (Hebrew), 1938, 10, 56–80.Google Scholar
  44. Wolman, B. Historical laws—do they exist: Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Philosophy, Amsterdam, 1948. ( Abstr. )Google Scholar
  45. Zeigarnik, B. Über das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen. Psychol. Forsch., 1927, 9, 1–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin B. Wolman
    • 1
  1. 1.Long Island UniversityBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations