Gestalt Psychology

  • J. Ward
  • G. F. Stout
  • Alfred Binet
  • Karl Bühler


It has often been said that associationism and conditioning developed the theory of learning, psychoanalysis created the theory of motivation, and gestalt and field theories revolutionized the theory of perception and thinking. Undoubtedly, this statement contains a great deal of truth. The origin of the gestalt theory is connected with the difficulties encountered by traditional associationism in regard to perception and thinking. The associationists believed that (1) perception is a copy of objects, or a “mental image” of what has been perceived, and (2) thinking is a mechanical combination of those images.1 Gestalt psychology challenged both parts of this belief.


Gestalt Psychology Mental Image Dynamic Field Good Continuation Figural Aftereffect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ach, N. Über den Willensakt und das Temperament: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer, 1910.Google Scholar
  2. Binet, A. Étude expérimentale de l’intelligence. Paris: Schleicher, 1910.Google Scholar
  3. Boring, E. G. A history of experimental psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts, 1950.Google Scholar
  4. Bühler, K. Tatsachen und probleme zu einer Psychologie der Denkvorgänge. I. Über Gedanken. II. Über Gedanken Zusammenhänge. III. Über Gedanken erinnerungen. Arch. Psychol., 1907, 9, 297–305; 1908, 22, 1–23; 1908, 12, 24–92.Google Scholar
  5. Bühler, K. Gestalt Perzeption. Stuttgart: Speeman, 1913.Google Scholar
  6. Bühler, K. Die Theorie der Perzeption. Jena: Fischer, 1922.Google Scholar
  7. Claparède, E. La genèse de l’hypothèse, étude expérimentale. Arch. Psychol., 1933, 24, 1–154.Google Scholar
  8. Humphrey, G. Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. London: Methuen, 1951.Google Scholar
  9. Janet, P. L’automatisme psychologique. Paris: Alcan, 1889.Google Scholar
  10. Külpe, O. Aussichten der experimentellen Psychologie. Philos. Monatshefte, 1894, 30, 281–294.Google Scholar
  11. Külpe, O. Über die Objektivierung und Subjektivierung von Sinnesausdrücken. Philos. Stud., 1902, 19, 508–556.Google Scholar
  12. Külpe, O. Pour la psychologie du sentiment. J. Psychol, norm, path., 1910, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. Külpe, O. Vorlesungen über die Psychologie. (2nd ed., Ed., K. Bühler.) Leipzig: Hirzel, 1922.Google Scholar
  14. Messer, A. Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchungen über das Denken. Arch. gen. Psychol., 1906, 8, 1–224.Google Scholar
  15. Michotte, A. La perception de la causalité. Louvain: Inst. Supérieur Philos., 1946.Google Scholar
  16. Müller, G. E. Experimentelle Beiträge zur Untersuchung des Gedächtnisses. Z. Psychol., 1894, 6, 81–190, 257–339.Google Scholar
  17. Müller, G. E. Komplextheorie und Gestalttheorie. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck, 1923.Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, G. Historical introduction to modern psychology. (Reved.) New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949.Google Scholar
  19. Stout, G. F. Analytic psychology. London: Allen & Unwin, 1902, 2 vols.Google Scholar
  20. Ward, J. Psychology. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. (9th ed.) London: 1886.Google Scholar
  21. Watt, H. J. Experimentelle Beiträge zu einer Theorie des Denkeus. Arch ges. Psychol., 1905, 4, 289–436.Google Scholar
  22. Adamson, R. E., & Taylor, D. W. Functional fixedness as related to elapsed time and set. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 122–126.Google Scholar
  23. Allport, H. Theories of perception and the concept of structure. New York: Wiley, 1955.Google Scholar
  24. Asch, S. Max Wertheimer’s contribution to modern psychology. Soc. Res., 1946, 13, 81–102.Google Scholar
  25. Birth, H. G. The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving. J. comp. Psychol., 1945, 38, 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Boring, E. G. The gestalt psychology and the gestalt movement. Amer. J. Psychol., 1930, 42, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duncker, K. On problem solving. Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 58, No. 270.Google Scholar
  28. Ehrenfels, C. V. On gestalt qualities. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis, W. D. A source book of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1938.Google Scholar
  30. Hartmann, G. W. Gestalt psychology, a survey of facts and principles. New York: Ronald, 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helson, H. The fundamental propositions of gestalt psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1933, 40, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henle, M. An experimental investigation of past experience as a determiant of visual form of perception. J. exp. Psychol., 1942, 30, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henle, M. (Ed.) Documents of Gestalt psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  34. Humphrey, G. Thinking. London: Methuen, 1951.Google Scholar
  35. Katona, G. Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, G. Gestalt psychology, its nature and significance. New York: Ronald, 1950.Google Scholar
  37. Koffka, K. The growth of the mind. London: Kegan Paul, 1924.Google Scholar
  38. Koffka, K. Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1935.Google Scholar
  39. Köhler, W. Die physikalischen Gestalten in Ruhe und in stationären Zustand. Erlangen: Weltkreis, 1920.Google Scholar
  40. Köhler, W. The mentality of apes. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1925.Google Scholar
  41. Köhler, W. Psychologische Probleme. Berlin: Springer, 1933.Google Scholar
  42. Köhler, W. Zur Psychophysik des Vergleichs und des Raumes. Psychol. Forsch., 1933, 18, 343–360.Google Scholar
  43. Köhler, W. The place of value in a world of facts. New York: Liveright, 1938.Google Scholar
  44. Köhler, W. Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright, 1940.Google Scholar
  45. Köhler, W. On the nature of associations. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 1941, 84, 489–502.Google Scholar
  46. Köhler, W. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright, 1947.Google Scholar
  47. Köhler, W., & Restorff, H. Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld. Psychol. Forsch., 1935, 22, 56–112.Google Scholar
  48. Köhler, W., & Wallach, H. Figural after-effects: an investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.Google Scholar
  49. Kruger, F. E. Über psychische Ganzheit. Neue psychol. Stud., 1926, 1, 1–123.Google Scholar
  50. Newman, E. B. Forgetting of meaningful material during sleep and waking. Amer. J. Psychol., 1939, 52, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pechstein, L. A., & Brown, F. D. An experimental analysis of the alleged criteria of insight learning. J. educ. Psychol., 1939, 30, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Petermann, B. The gestalt theory and the problem of configuration. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1932.Google Scholar
  53. Spence, K. W. Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spitz, H. The present status of the Köhler-Wallach theory of satiation. Psychol. Bull, 1958, 55, 1–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stolurov, L. M. (Ed.) Readings in learning. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1953.Google Scholar
  56. Wertheimer, M. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Z. Psychol., 1912, 61, 161–265.Google Scholar
  57. Wertheimer, M. Untersuchung zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychol. Forsch., 1922,1, 47–65; 1923, 4, 301–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wertheimer, M. Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie. Berlin: Erlangen, 1935.Google Scholar
  59. Wertheimer, M. Productive thinking. New York: Harper, 1945.Google Scholar
  60. Yerkes, R. M. The mind of a gorilla. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1927, 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ward
  • G. F. Stout
  • Alfred Binet
  • Karl Bühler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations