Advertisement

Sentencing by Parole Board

The Parole Revocation Decision
  • John S. Carroll
  • R. Barry Ruback
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 2)

Abstract

In most states and in the federal system, the sentencing judge is not the sole determiner of how long a convicted offender will be in prison. Typically, the judge sets bounds on the time to be served (e.g., two to six years) without exactly specifying it. An administrative entity, the parole board, reviews the case periodically and decides exactly when to release the offender. Thus, judges and parole boards are jointly responsible for determining incarceration (Genego, Goldberger, & Jackson, 1975; Stanley, 1976).

Keywords

Board Member Board Action Crime Category Technical Violation Parole Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll, J. S. Causal attributions in expert parole decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1501–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. Judgments about crime and the criminal: A model and a method for investigating parole decisions. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology. Vol. 1: The criminal justice system. New York: Plenum, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundel,455 Pa. 8, 314 A. 2d 842 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, H. R. Parole and probation revocation procedures after Morrissey and Gagnon. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1974, 65, 45–61.Google Scholar
  5. Genego, W. J., Goldberger, P. D., & Jackson, V. C. Parole release decision-making and the sentencing process. Yale Law Journal, 1975, 84 (4), 810–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gagnon v. Scarpelli,411 U.S. 778 (1973).Google Scholar
  7. Gottfredson, D. M., Hoffman, P. B., Sigler, M. H., & Wilkins, L. T. Making paroling policy explicit. Crime and Delinquency, 1975, 21, 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mitchell v. Commonwealth,31 Pa. Commw. Ct. 243, 375 A. 2d 902 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. Morrissey v. Brewer,408 U.S. 471 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. National Council on Crime and Delinquency, National Probation and Parole Institutes. Uniform Parole Reports Newsletter, November, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Neithercutt, M. G. Parole violation patterns and commitment offense. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1972, 9, 97–98.Google Scholar
  12. Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stanley, D. T. Prisoners among us. Washington: Brookings, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John S. Carroll
    • 1
  • R. Barry Ruback
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLoyola UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations