Advertisement

Dental Evolutionary Trends of Relevance to the Origin and Dispersion of the Platyrrhine Monkeys

  • F. J. Orlosky
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

The evolutionary history of the platyrrhine primates has been the subject of considerable controversy. Comparative studies of extant Old and New World higher primates suggest that these forms and the platyrrhines are each monophyletic, but the nature and origin of common ancestral groups remains in doubt. It has been hypothesized that the Platyrrhini evolved from a lemuroid stock (Liedy, 1873; Loomis, 1911; Gregory, 1920, 1921; Gingerich, 1973, 1975, 1977), a tarsioid stock (Wortman, 1904; Gazin, 1958; Simons, 1961, 1972; Hoffstetter, 1969, 1974; Orlosky and Swindler, 1975; Szalay, 1976) or a monkey stock (Stirton, 1951; Olson, 1964; Hershkovitz, 1969; Sarich, 1970; Cronin and Sarich, 1975). Most of the above authors assumed that the South American primates were derived from some North American or Central American primate group. However, some have hypothesized that an African stock might have been ancestral to the platyrrhine primates (Sarich, 1970; Hoffstetter, 1972, 1974; Lavocat, 1974; Cronin and Sarich, 1975). Indeed, recent geological evidence (see Tarling, this volume) indicates that an immigration of primates into South America from Africa would be quite as feasible during the late Eocene to early Oligocene as a North American origin for these primates.

Keywords

Late Miocene World Monkey Late Eocene Primitive Feature Dental Feature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cronin, J. E. and Sarich, V. M., 1975, Molecular systematics of the New World monkeys, J. Hum. Evol. 4: 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delson, E., and Andrews, P., 1975, Evolution and interrelationships of the catarrhine primates, in: Phylogeny of the Primates ( W. P. Luckett, and F. S. Szalay, eds.), pp. 405–446, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gazin, C. L., 1958, A review of the middle and upper Eocene primates of North America, Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 136: 1–112.Google Scholar
  4. Gingerich, P. D., 1973, Anatomy of the temporal bone in the Oligocene anthropoid Apidium and the origin of Anthropoidea, Folia Primatol. 19: 329–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gingerich, P. D., 1975, Dentition of Adapts parisiensis and the evolution of lemuriform primates, in: Lemur Biology ( I. Tattersall, and R. W. Sussman, eds.), pp. 65–80, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gingerich, P. D., 1977, New species of Eocene primates and the phylogeny of European Adapidae, Folia Primatol. 28: 60–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregory, W. K., 1920, Evolution of the human dentition. Part IV. The South American monkeys, J. Dent. Res. 2: 404–426.Google Scholar
  8. Gregory, W. K., 1921, On the structure and relationships of Notharctus, an American Eocene primate, Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. His. 3: 49–243.Google Scholar
  9. Hershkovitz, P., 1969, The evolution of mammals on Southern continents. VI. The Recent mammals of the Neotropical Region: A zoogeographic and ecological review, Q. Rev. Biol. 44: 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hershkovitz, P., 1970. Notes on Tertiary platyrrhine monkeys and description of a new genus from the late Miocene of Colombia, Folia Primatol. 12: 1–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hershkovitz, P., 1974, A new genus of late Oligocene monkey (Cebidae, Platyrrhini) with notes on postorbital closure and platyrrhine evolution, Folia Primatol. 21: 1–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hershkovitz, P., 1977, Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini) with an Introduction to Primates, Vol. 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffstetter, M. R., 1969, Un primate de]’Oligocène inférieur sud-américain: Branisella boliviana gen. et sp. nov., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. D 269: 434–437.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffstetter, R., 1972, Relationships, origins, and history of the ceboid monkeys and caviomorph rodents: A modern reinterpretation, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6 ( Th. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds.), pp. 323–347, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffstetter, M. R., 1974, Phylogeny and geographical deployment of the primates, J. Hum. Evol. 3: 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinzey, W. G., 1973, Reduction of the cingulum in Ceboidea, in: Craniofacial Biology of Primates, Vol. 3 ( M. A. Zingeser, ed.), pp. 101–127, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  17. Kinzey, W. G., 1974, Ceboid models for the evolution of hominoid dentition, J. Hum. Evol. 3: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraglievich, J. L., 1951, Contribuciones al conocimiento de los primates f•siles de la Patagonia. 1. Diagnosis previa de un nuevo primate fósil del Oligocene superior (Colhuehuapiano) de Gaimân, Chubut, Corn. Inst. Nac. Invest. Cienc. Nat. (Buenos Aires), Cienc. Zool. 11:55–82.Google Scholar
  19. Lavocat, R. 1974, The interrelationships between the African and South American rodents and their bearing on the problem of the origin of South American monkeys, J. Hum. Evol. 3:323–326.Google Scholar
  20. Liedy, J., 1873, Contributions to the extinct vertebrate fauna of the western territories, Report of U.S. Geological Survey Territory (Hayden) 1: 1 - -358.Google Scholar
  21. Loomis, F. B., 1911, The adaptations of the primates, Am. Nat. 45: 479–492.Google Scholar
  22. Olson, E. C., 1964, The geology and mammalian faunas of the Tertiary and Pleistocene of South America, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 22: 217–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlosky, F. J., 1973, Comparative dental morphology of extant and extinct Cebidae, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  24. Orlosky, F.J., and Swindler, D. R., 1975, Origins of New World monkeys, J. Hum. Evol. 4: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarich, V. M., 1970, Primate systematics with special reference to Old World monkeys, in: Old World Monkeys: Evolution, Systematics, and Behavior ( J. R. Napier and P. H. Napier, eds.), pp. 175–226, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Savage, D. E., and Waters, B. T. 1978, A new omomyid primate from the Wasatch formation of southern Wyoming, Folio Primatol. 30: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simons, E. L., 1961, The dentition of Ourayia: Its bearing on relationships of omomyid prosimians, Postilla No. 54:1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Simons, E. L., 1962, Two new primate species from the African Oligocene, Postilla No. 64:1–12. Simons, E. L., 1972, Primate Evolution: An Introduction to Man’s Place in Nature, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Stirton, R. A., 1951, Ceboid monkeys from the Miocene of Colombia, Bull. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 28: 315–356.Google Scholar
  30. Szalay, F. S., 1976, Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates) taxonomy, phylogeny and adaptations, Bull. Am. Mus. of Nat. Hist. 156: 157–450.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, J. A., and F. S. Szalay, 1976, New adapid primate of European affinities from Texas, Folia Primatol. 25:294–312.Google Scholar
  32. Wortman, J. L., 1903–1904, Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh Collection, Peabody Museum. Part II: Primates, Am. J. Sci. 15163–176,399–414, 419–436, and 17:23–33, 133–140, 203–214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. Orlosky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations