Advertisement

Clinical Histocompatibility Testing in Renal Transplantation

Potential Keys to Alloimmune Specificity and Reactivity
  • Ronald H. Kerman
  • Barry D. Kahan

Abstract

Allograft rejection is due to recipient sensitization to foreign, donor histocompatibility antigens resulting in activation of multiple immunological vectors of tissue destruction (Medawar, 1944; Stiller and Sinclair, 1979; Carpenter and Morris, 1979). Due to the functional reserve of the kidney, signs of rejection are frequently evident only after extensive damage to the allografted tissue. The clinical diagnosis of renal-allograft rejection is based on patient symptoms and signs, namely, fever, weight gain, swelling, pain, or hypertension. Laboratory evidences of reduced renal function include elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, decreased creatinine clearance, increased albumin clearance, and lymphocyturia. Tissue typing and cross-matching procedures attempt to minimize the tissue incompatibility and avert grafting into presensitized hosts. Since the signs, symptoms, and laboratory evidences of rejection are late events, immunological evidences of recipient activation of a primary immune response may alert the clinician, thereby affording the possibility for prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy to minimize the extent of tissue damage. However, due to the variety of antibody and cell-mediated components of immune mechanisms documented in rejection (Busch et al., 1976, 1977) recipient immune activation cannot always be documented. Indeed, there is no known test that is immunologically specific, sensitive, predictive, or at least confirmatory, and associated with few false-positive reactions.

Keywords

Renal Transplantation Allograft Rejection Renal Allograft Rejection Episode Renal Allograft Recipient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, F., and Voynow, N., 1966, One-way stimulation in mixed leucocyte cultures, Science 153:545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain, B., and Lowenstein, L., 1964, A reaction between leukocytes in mixed peripheral blood cultures, Science 145:1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckingham J.M., Ritts, R.E., Woods, J.E., and Ilstrup, D.M., 1977, An assessment of cell-mediated immunity in acute allograft rejection in man, Mayo Clin. Proc. 52:101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buda, J., Jacob, G., Lattes, C., Stevens, L., Sotelo, J., Suciu-Foca, N., Weil, R., and Reemstma, K., 1975, Prediction of humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients by MLC inhibition, Transplant. Proc. 7:671.Google Scholar
  5. Busch, G.J., Schamberg, J.F., and Moretz, R.C., 1976, T and B cell patterns in irreversibly rejected human renal allografts, Lab. Invest. 35:272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch, G.J., Schamberg, J.F., Strom, T.B., Tilney, N.L., and Carpenter, C.B., 1977, Four patterns of human renal allograft rejection: A cytologic and in vitro analysis of the infiltrate in 24 irreversibly rejected kidneys, Transplant. Proc. 9:37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, C.B., and Morris, P.J., 1979, Immunologic monitoring of transplant patients, Transplant. Proc. 11:1153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerilli, J., Holliday, J.E., and Fesperman, D.P., 1977, Role of antivascular endothelial antibody in predicting renal allograft rejection, Transplant. Proc. 9:771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collaborative report of the Scanditransplant, 1975, Lancet 1:240.Google Scholar
  10. Cosimi, A.B., Wortis, H.H., Delmonico, F.L., and Russell, P.S., 1976, Randomized clinical trial of antithymocyte globulin in cadaver renal allograft recipients: Importance of T cell monitoring, Surgery 80:155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. d’Apice, A.J., and Morris, P.J., 1974, The role of antibody-dependent mediated cytotoxicity in renal allograft rejection, Transplantation 18:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dausset, J., Hors, J., and Busson, M.N., 1974, Serologically defined HLA antigens and long term survival of cadaver kidney transplants, N. Engl. J. Med. 290:979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David, J.R., Al-Askari, S., Lawrence, H.W., and Thomas, L., 1964, The specificity of inhibition of cell migration by antigen, J. Immunol. 93:264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Descamps, B., Gagnon, R., Debray-Sachs, M., Barbanel, C., and Crosnier, J., 1975, Lymphocyte-dependent and complement-dependent antibodies in human renal allograft recipients, Transplant. Proc. 7:635.Google Scholar
  15. Dormont, J., Sobel, A., Galanand, P., Crevon, M.C., and Colombani, J., 1972, Leucocyte migration inhibition with spleen extracts and other antigens in patients with renal allografts, Transplant. Proc. 4:265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dossetor, J.B., and Myburgh, J.A., 1978, Posttransplant immunologic monitoring: Summation, Transplant. Proc. 10:661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Falk, R.E., Guttman, R.D., and Falk, J.A., 1972, A study of cell mediated immunity to transplantation antigens in human renal allograft recipients, Transplant. Proc. 4:271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fudenberg, H.H., Wybran, J., and Robbins, O., 1975, T-rosette forming cells, cellular immunity and cancer, N. Engl. J. Med. 292:475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gailiunas, P., Suthanthiran, M., Person, A., Strom, T.B., Carpenter, C.B., and Garavoy, M.R., 1978, Posttransplant immunologic monitoring of the renal allograft recipient, Transplant. Proc. 10:609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garovoy, M.R., Franco, V., Zschaeck, D., Strom, T., Carpenter, C.B., and Merrill, J.P., 1973a, Direct lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity as an assay of presensitization, Lancet 1:573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garovoy, M.R., Phillips, S.M., Carpenter, C.B., and Merrill, J.P., 1973b, Antibody modulation of cellular reactivity post renal transplantation, Transplant. Proc. 5:129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hattler, B.G., Miller, J., and Johnson, M.C., 1972, Cellular and humoral factors governing canine mixed lymphocyte cultures after renal transplantation, Transplantation 14:47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hersh, E.M., Butler, W.T., Rossen, R., Morgan, R.O., and Suki, W., 1971, In vitro studies of the human response to organ allografts: Appearance and detection of circulating activation lymphocytes, J. Immunol. 107:571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iwaki, Y., Terasaki, P.I., Weil, T., Koep, L., and Starzl, T., 1979, Retrospective tests of B-cold lymphocytotoxins and transplant survival at a single center, Transplant. Proc. 11:941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahan, B.D., Mittal, K.K., Reisfeld, R., Terasaki, P.I., and Bergan, J.J., 1973, The antigenic stimulus in human transplantation, Surgery 74:153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahan, B.D., Tom, B.H., Mittal, K.K., and Bergan, J.J., 1974, An immunodiagnostic test for transplant rejection, Lancet 1:37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahan, B.D., Krumlovsky, F., Ivanovitch, P., Greenwald, J., Firlit, C., Bergan, J.J., and Tom, B.H., 1975, Immunodiagnostic and immunotherapeutic applications of the leucocyte aggregation test, Arch. Surg. 110:984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katz, D., Paul, W., Goidl, E.A., and Benacerraf, B., 1970a, Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses, J. Exp. Med. 132:261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, D., Paul, W., Goidl, E.A., and Bennacerraf, B., 1970b, Stimulation of antibody synthesis and facilitation of hapten specific antibody responses by GVH reactions, J. Exp. Med. 133:169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerman, R.H., and Geis, W.P., 1976, Total and active T cell kinetics in renal allograft recipients, Surgery 79:398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerman, R.H., and Geis, W.P., 1978, T-RFC monitoring of CMI events in renal allograft recipients, Transplant. Proc. 10:633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerman, R., and Stefani, S., 1976, Immunological evaluation of patients with solid tumors before and after radiotherapy, in: Neoplasms Immunity: Mechanisms (R.G. Crispen, ed.), pp. 109–120, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Kerman, R.H., Smith, R., Ezdinli, E., and Stefani, S., 1976, Unification and technical aspects of total T, active T and B lymphocyte rosette assays, Immunol. Commun. 5:685.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kerman, R.H., Ing, T.S., Hano, J.E., and Geis, W.P., 1977, Prognostic significance of the active T-RFC in renal allograft survival, Surgery 82:607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerman, R.H., Roesler, H., and Kahan, B.D., 1978, Specific stimulation of active T-rosette forming cells by 3M KC1 solubilized antigen, Fed. Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 37:1686.Google Scholar
  36. Kerman, R.H., Floyd, M., Conner, W., McConnell, B.J., McConnell, R., Van Buren, C.T., and Kahan, B.D., 1979, Combined immunological and radionuclide techniques to monitor renal allograft rejection, Transplant. Proc. 11:1229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kissmeyer-Nielson, F., Olsen, S., Peterson, V., and Fjeldborg, O., 1966, Hyperacute rejection of kidney allografts associated with pre-existing antibodies against donor cells, Lancet 2:663.Google Scholar
  38. Kovithavongs, T., Schlant, J., Pazdaka, V., Lao, V., Pazderka, F., Bettcher, K.B., and Dossetor, J.B., 1978, Posttransplant immunologic monitoring with special consideration of technique and interpretation of LMC, Transplant. Proc. 10:547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Medawar, P.B., 1944, The behavior and fate of skin autografts and skin homografts in rabbits, J. Anat. (London) 78:176.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, J., Howard, R.J., Hattler, B.G., and Najarian, J.S., 1973, Correlation of MLC reactivity after experimental and clinical transplantation—Virus and cytophilic antibody: Source of false negatives, Transplant. Proc. 5:1771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, J., Lifton, J., Rood, F., and Hattler, B., 1975, Blocking vs. cytotoxic antibody in HLA and mixed lymphocyte culture identical and nonidentical human renal transplant recipients, Transplantation 20:53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, J., Lifton, J., DeWolf, W.C., Stevens, B.J., and Wilcox, C., 1976, Adaptation to human and animal organ allografts: Reconsideration of a hypothesis, Transplant. Proc. 8:217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, J., Lifton, J., and Wilcox, C., 1978, The use of second-generation assays in pre-and posttransplant monitoring: The primed or second-degree MLC, Transplant. Proc. 10:573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Moraes, J.R., and Stastny, P., 1977, A new antigen system expressed in human endothelial cells, J. Clin. Invest. 60:449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morris, R.E., Dong, E., Struthers, C.M., Griepp, R.B., and Stinson, E.B., 1978, Immunologic monitoring of cardiac transplant recipients by a modified reactive leucocyte blastogenesis assay, Transplant. Proc. 10:585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Opelz, G., and Terasaki, P.I., 1976, Recipient selection for renal retransplantation, Transplantation 21:483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phillips, S.M., Carpenter, C.B., and Merrill, S.P., 1972, Cellular immunity in the mouse: Correlation of in-vivo and in-vitro phenomena, Cell. Immunol. 5:249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rapaport, F.T., Watanabe, K., and Cannon, F.D., 1972, Histocompatibility studies in a closely bred colony of dogs, J. Exp. Med. 136:1080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rapaport, F.T., Bachvaroff, R.C., Dicke, K., and Santos, G., 1979, Total body irradiation and host reconstitution with stored autologous marrow: An experimental model for the induction of allogeneic unresponsiveness in large mammals, Transplant. Proc. 11:1028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rashid, A., Sengar, D.P.S., and Harris, T.E., 1975, Role of mixed-leucocyte-culture blocking factor activity in human kidney transplants, Transplant. Proc. 7:667.Google Scholar
  51. Rolley, R.T., Widman, D.G., Parks, L.C., Sterioff, S., and Williams, G.M., 1978, Monitoring of responsiveness in dialysis-transplant patients by delayed-cutaneous hypersensitivity tests, Transplant. Proc. 10:505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Salaman, J.R., and Miller, J.J., 1979, Nonspecific chemical immunosuppression, Transplant. Proc. 11:845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Soulillon, J.P., Mouton, A. de, Reyrat, M.A., and Guenell, J., 1979, Role of anti-donor B lymphocyte antibodies in definitive allograft rejection, Transplant. Proc. 11:770.Google Scholar
  54. Starzl, T.E., Koep, J., Weil, R., Halgrimson, C.G., and Franks, J.J., 1979, Thoracic duct drainage in organ transplantation: Will it permit better immunosuppression?, Transplant. Proc. 11:276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stiller, C.R., Sinclair, St.C., Abrahams, S., McGirr, D., Singh, H., Howson, W.T., and Ulan, R.A., 1976, Anti-donor immune responses in prediction of transplant rejection, N. Engl. J. Med. 294:979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stiller, C.R., and Sinclair, N.R. St.C., 1979, Monitoring of rejection, Transplant. Proc. 11:343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Strober, S., Slavin, S., Fuks, Z., Kaplan, H.S., Gottlieb, M., Bieber, C., Hoppe, R.T., and Brumet, F.C., 1979, Transplantation tolerance after total lymphoid irradiation, Transplant. Proc. 11:1032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Suciu-Foca, N., Buda, J.A., Thiem, S., and Reemstma, K., 1974, Evaluation of the immune status of transplant recipients by mixed lymphocyte culture, Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2:530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Terasaki, P.I., Opelz, G., and Mickey, M.R., 1978, Summary of kidney transplant data, 1977: Factors affecting graft outcome, Transplant. Proc. 10:417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas, F., Mendez-Picon, G., Thomas, J., Lee, H.M., and Lowe, R., 1978, Effective monitoring and modulation of recipient immune reactivity to prevent rejection in early posttransplant period, Transplant. Proc. 10:537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas, J., Thomas, F., and Kaplan, A., 1976, Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and chronic renal allograft rejection, Transplantation 22:94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tom, B.H., Jakstys, M.M., and Kahan, B.D., 1974, Leukocyte aggregation: An in-vitro assay for cell-mediated immunity, J. Immunol. 113:1288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Weeke, E., Weeke, B., and Bendixen, G., 1970, Organ specific, anti-renal cellular hypersensitivity after kidney transplantation, Acta Med. Scand. 188:307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, G.M., 1979, Progress in clinical renal transplantation, Transplant. Proc. 11:4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, G.M., Hume, D.M., Hudson, R.P., Morris, P.J., Kano, K., and Milgrom, F., 1968, Hyperacute renal-homograft rejection in man, N. Engl. J. Med. 279:611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, R.J., Mallick, N.P., Taylor, G., and Orr, W.M., 1974, The early diagnosis of rejection by the leucocyte migration test in cadaveric renal transplantation, Clin. Nephrol. 2:100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, R.M., and Benacerraf, B., 1972, Genetic control of thymus-derived cell function, J. Exp. Med. 135:1279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, D.B., 1965, Quantitative studies on the behavior of sensitized lymphocytes in vitro, J. Exp. Med. 122:143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wybran, J., and Fudenberg, H.H., 1973, Thymus-derived rosette-forming cells, N. Engl. J. Med. 288:1072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald H. Kerman
    • 1
  • Barry D. Kahan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of SurgeryThe University of Texas Medical School at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations