Comparison of Some Seismic Imaging Techniques

  • Thomas T. Hu
  • Keith Wang
  • Fred Hilterman
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 9)


Scalar wave theory is applied to solve three-dimensional seismic imaging problems. Different ways of implementing the solutions lead to various migration techniques where the areal distribution of subsurface reflection coefficients is obtained. Current widely used migration techniques are the Kirchhoff summation method, the frequency domain method and the finite difference method. Other algorithms include the use of Fresnel imaging, Fraunhofer imaging, the lensless Fourier transform holography and the wave vector diversity concepts to generate subsurface images.

Fundamental differences and similarities among these algorithms are compared on a theoretical basis. The mathematical basis of each of the above-mentioned techniques is cast into a similar integral form for comparison and implementation. Medium homogeneity is assumed in the analysis for simplicity. A set of synthetic time sections is generated; the migrated sections using these different migration algorithms are compared. Major differences in the images are observed with some explanations.


Finite Difference Technique Migration Algorithm Acoustical Holography Migration Technique Delay Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. D. Corl, and G. S. Kino, “A Real-Time Synthetic-Aperture Imaging System”, Acoustical Holography, V. 9, Wang Ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 000–000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. A. Schneider, “Integral Formation for Migration in Two and Three-Dimensions”, Geophysics, V. 43, pp. 49–76, (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. W. Goodman, Introduction of Fourier Optics, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. H. Stolt, “Migration by Fourier Transform”, Geophysics, V. 43, pp. 23–48, (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bolondi, F. Rocca, and S. Savelli, “A Frequency Domain Approach to Two-Dimensional Migration”, Geophysical Prospecting, V. 26, pp. 750–772, (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. F. Claerboud, Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Risto and W. Houba, “3-D Finite Difference Migration”, Presented at the EAEG 41st Meeting, Hamburg, (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. H. Farhat, and C. K. Chan, “Three-Dimensional Imaging by Wave-Vector Diversity”, Presented at the 8th Symposium on Acoustical Imaging, Key Biscayne, Fla., May 1978.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Reghunathan, “Zero-Source-Receiver-Offset Imaging with Wave-Vector Diversity”, Master’s Thesis, University of Houston, (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Morgan, G. Fitzpatrick, F. Hilterman, K. Wang, “Lensless Fourier Transform Holography as Applied to Imaging of Reflection Seismic Data”, Acoustical Holography, V. 9, Wang Ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 000–000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas T. Hu
    • 1
  • Keith Wang
    • 1
  • Fred Hilterman
    • 1
  1. 1.Seismic Acoustics LaboratoryUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations