Rheology pp 349-354 | Cite as

The Rate-Dependent Fracture Behavior of High Performance Sulfone Polymers

  • R. Y. Ting
  • R. L. Cottington


Many fiber-reinforced composite systems have been given considerable attention for potential aerospace and advanced ship applications. This is primarily because of the superior specific modulus and tensile strength the composite materials exhibit. For many applications conventional polymer matrix materials such as polyesters and epoxies are not suitable since they have maximum use temperatures of only 90°C to 120°C. Recently, many “high performance polymers”, which offer 170°C to 260°C temperature capability, have become available. These include tetrafunctional epoxies, thermosetting polyimides and some thermoplastic polymers such as polysulfone. One of the important mechanical properties that need to be evaluated for these polymers is their resistance to crack propagation. Bascom, Bitner and Cottingtonl determined the fracture energy of many high performance polymers and concluded that the thermoplastics are much “tougher” than the thermosetting materials. While this would certainly be translated into superior impact properties, the thermoplastics are also attractive because they can be formed easily and possess good storage and handling capability at room temperatures. In this paper, the rate-dependent fracture behavior of two high performance sulfone polymers is reported.


Fracture Toughness Fracture Energy Dynamic Mechanical Property Polymer Fracture Handling Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. D. Bascom, J. L. Bitner and R. L. Cottington, Amer. Chem. Soc., Organic Coatings and Plastics Chemistry Preprint, 38, 477 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. F. Knott, Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics, Butterworth, London, 1973, p. 131.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Schultz, in Fracture Mechanics of Aircraft Structures, ed. M. Liebowitz, AGARDograph, AGARD Rept. AG-176, NTIS, Springfield, VA, 1974, p. 370.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. E. Reed, in Developments in Polymer Fracture, Vol. 1, ed. E. H. Andrews, Appl. Sci. Pub., London, 1979, p. 121.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Plati and J. G. Williams, Polym. Eng. Sci., 15, 470 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. E. Nelson, Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, Vol. 1, Dekker, NY, 1974, p. 15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Y. Ting
    • 1
  • R. L. Cottington
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymeric Materials Branch, Chemistry DivisionNaval Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations