Advertisement

Rheology pp 53-58 | Cite as

Elastic Effects in Die Entry Flows

  • M. J. Crochet
  • M. Bézy

Abstract

The kinematics of die entry flow is a complex phenomenon in which inertia, shear-thinning and elasticity play a significant role. A clear understanding of the effect of these three features upon the flow field on the basis of experimental results (e.g. Cable and Boger, 1978) is difficult because of the practical impossibility of separating these effects in general. The discovery by Boger and Nguyen (1978) of a viscous fluid which is highly elastic at low shear rates while not shear thinning and optically clear led to a series of experimental observations of die inlet flow at very low Reynolds numbers where the sole parameter is the elasticity of the flow. Dramatic results have been reported by Nguyen and Boger (1979). At low flow rates, a corner vortex upstream of the small tube entrance remains stationary; when the flow rate (or the elastic character of the flow) increases, the vortex grows and leads eventually to various modes of unstable flow. All test fluids (glucose syrup-Separan solutions) presented a domain of shear rate associated with second-order viscometric behavior. Nguyen and Boger (1979) made the observation that the initiation of the vortex growth regime occurs at shear rates just beyond the domain of second-order behavior.

Keywords

Shear Rate Wall Shear Stress Viscoelastic Fluid Normal Stress Difference Test Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boger, D. V., and Nguyen, H., 1978, “A Model viscoelastic fluid,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 18:1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cable, P. J., and Boger, D. V., 1978, “A comprehensive investigation of tubular entry flow of viscoelastic fluids,” AIChE Journal, 24:869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crochet, M. J., and Bézy, M., 1979, “Numerical solution for the flow of viscoelastic fluids,” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 5:201.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crochet, M. J., and Keunings, R., 1980, “Die swell of a Maxwell fluid: numerical prediction,” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 7:to be published.Google Scholar
  5. Nguyen, N., and Boger, D. V., 1979, “The kinematics and stability of die entry flows,’ J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 5:353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Perera, M. G. N., and Walters, K., 1977, “Long range memory effects in flows involving abrupt changes in geometry,” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 2:49.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Viriyayuthakorn, M., and Caswell, B., 1980, “Finite element simulation of viscoelastic flow,” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 7:to be published.Google Scholar
  8. White, J. L., and Metzner, A. B., 1963, “Development of consitutive equations for polymeric melts and solutions,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 7:1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Crochet
    • 1
  • M. Bézy
    • 1
  1. 1.Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations