Advertisement

Imagery pp 349-355 | Cite as

The Sandtray: Group Techniques

  • Russell Bader
  • Revel Miller

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a non-directive, dramatic, projective technique used to elicit mental imagery—the sandtray. Although originally associated with individual psychotherapy, it has recently been used in group therapy with adolescents and adults (Miller, 1979; Mizushima, 1971-1972).

Keywords

Mental Imagery Child Psychiatry Projective Technique Group Technique Professional Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aite, P. Communication through imagination. The Annual of Italian Analytical Psychologists, 1977, 1, 105–129.Google Scholar
  2. Aite, P. Ego and image: some observations on the theme of “Sand Play.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 1978, 23, 332–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolgar, H., and Fischer, L. The toy test: a psychodiagnostic method. Psychological Bulletin, 1940, 34, 517–518.Google Scholar
  4. Bolgar, H., and Fisher, L. K. Personality projection in the World Test. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1947, 17, 117–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowyer, L. R. The Lowenfeld world technique. Oxford and London: Pergamon, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Buhler, C. Symbolic action in children. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1941, 17, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhler, C. The World Test. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 1951(a), 2, 2–3.Google Scholar
  8. Buhler, C. The World Test: a projective technique. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 1951 (b), 2, 4–23.Google Scholar
  9. Buhler, C. National differences in the “World Test” projective patterns. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1952, 16, 42–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dundas, E. Symbols come alive in the sand, 1978. (Available from author, Santa Cruz, California.)Google Scholar
  11. Fischer, L. K. A new psychological tool in function: preliminary clinical experience with the Bolgar-Fischer World Test. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1950(a), 20, 281–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, L. K. The World Test. In W. Wolff (Ed.), Projective and expressive methods of personality investigation. New York: Greene & Stratton, Inc., 1950(b).Google Scholar
  13. Jung, C. G. Structure and dynamics of the psyche, Vol. 8, Collected Works. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Kalff, D. The archetype as a healing factor. International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 1966, 9, 177–184.Google Scholar
  15. Kalff, D. Sandplay. San Francisco: Browser Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Kamp, L. N. J., and Kessler, E. S. World Test developmental aspects of a play technique. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 1970, 11, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowenfeld, M. A new approach to the problem of psychoneurosis in childhood. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1931, 11, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowenfeld, M. The theory and use of play in psychotherapy of childhood. Journal of Mental Science, 1938, 84, 1057–1058.Google Scholar
  19. Lowenfeld, M. The world pictures of children: a method of recording and studying them. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1939, 18, 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowenfeld, M. The nature and use of the Lowenfeld world technique with children and adults. Journal of Psychology, 1950, 30, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lumry, C. K. Study of World Test characteristics as a basis for discriminating between various clinical categories. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 1951, 2, 24–35.Google Scholar
  22. Michael, J. C., and Buhler, C. Experience with personality testing in a neuropsychiatric department of a public general hospital. Disease of the Nervous System, 1945, 6, 205–211.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, R. The investigation of a Psychotherapeutic tool for adults: the sandtray. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Fresno, 1979.Google Scholar
  24. Mizushima, K. Art therapies in Japan. Interpersonal Development, 1971-1972, 2, 213–221.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, J. P. Sand magic. New Mexico: J. P. R. Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. Sandu, M. Feminine psyche: an initial investigation of archetypal constellations as projected in sandplay. Unpublished master’s thesis, United States International University, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart, L. Sand play therapy: Jungian technique. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis and neurology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Sullwold, E. Eagle eye, the well-tended tree: essays into the spirit of our time. (Jung Foundation), Putnam, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. Ucko, L. E. Early stress experiences mirrored in “world” play test at five years. Human Development, 1967, 10, 107–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell Bader
    • 1
  • Revel Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Private PracticeFresnoUSA
  2. 2.California School of Professional PsychologyFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations