Advertisement

Mass Measurements with Pion Double Charge Exchange

Abstract

The first discussions1 of pion double charge exchange (DCX) dating back to the early 1960’s mention already the great potential of this reaction to study nuclei far from the line of stability. Early attempts by Gilly et al., at CERN failed because of the low pion intensities available at that time. The situation changed with the advent of high intensity pion beams at the ‘meson factories.’ DCX experiments by Burman et al.3 at the Low Energy Pion (LEP) channel of the Clinton P. Anderson Meson Physics Facility (LAMPF) yielded the first experimental value for the mass of 16Ne via the 16O(π+, π-) reaction. However, these experiments suffered from poor energy resolution (FWHM ~ 4 MeV) and the extracted mass excess for 16Ne is not very accurate (M.E. = 24.4 ± 0.5 MeV). When the Energetic Pion Channel and Spectrometer (EPICS) facility at LAMPF became fully operational, the first pion DCX was studied there by the Northwestern University group.4,5 In the course of these experiments, the mass excess of 18C was measured via the 18O(π-, π+) 18C reaction.5 Since then not only our group but also a collaboration of groups6 from the New Mexico State University, the University of Texas at Austin and the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory measured masses with pion DCX.

Keywords

Mass Measurement Mass Excess Phase Space Distribution Neutron Drip Line Ground State Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. D. Drell, H. J. Lipkin, and A. de-Shalit, quoted in T.E.O. Ericson, Proc. CERN 1963 Conf. High Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Gilly et al., Phys. Lett. 19, 335 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. L. Burman et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 1774 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. K. Seth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., to be published.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. K. Seth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1589 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. R. Burleson et al., submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. T. Hickey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 130 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Thibault et al., Phys. Rev. C 12, 644 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. J. Cole, A. Watt, and R. R. Whitehead, J. Phys. A7, L399 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Thibault and R. Klapisch, Phys. Rev. C 9, 793 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. A. Jelly, J. Cerny, D. P. Stahel, and K. H. Wilcox, Phys. Rev. C 11, 2049 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. H. Wapstra and K. Bos, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 19, 175 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. H. Wapstra and K. Bos, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 17, 474 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. T. Garvey, W. J. Gerace, R. L. Jaffe, I. Talmi, and I. Kelson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 51 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Benenson and E. Kashy, Rev. Mod., Phys., to be published.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. G. H. Robertson, E. Kashy, W. Benenson, and A. Ledebur, Phys. Rev. C 17, 4 (1978);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16a.
    R. G. H. Robertson, W. Benenson, E. Kashy, and D. Mueller, Phys. Rev. C 13, 1018 (1976);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16b.
    R. G. H. Robertson, W. S. Chien, and D. R. Goosman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 33 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    D. E. Alburger, S. Mordechai, H. T. Fortune, and R. Middleton, Phys. Rev. C 18, 2727 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    G. J. KeKelis et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 1929 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 19.
    D. M. Moltz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 43 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    J. Äystö et al., Phys. Lett. 82B, 43 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    E. Hagberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 792 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    R. E. Tribble, J. D. Cossairt, and R. A. Kenefick, Phys. Rev. C 15, 2028 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 23.
    R. E. Tribble et al., private communication.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. A248, 1 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 25.
    R. G. H. Robertson et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 1535 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    H. T. Fortune et al., Phys. Lett. 70B, 408 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 27.
    F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. A281, 1 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 28.
    P. M. Endt and C. van der Leun, Nucl. Phys. A310, 1 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Nann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations