Advertisement

A Theory of Education as a Basis for Environmental Education

  • Joseph D. Novak
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 18)

Abstract

Education can be improved if we design instruction and education research on the basis of a coherent theory that combines newer concepts from epistemology, psychology, and curriculum theory. The most crucial element in the theory is the nature of concepts and the role of concept learning (and concept using) as key elements in education. Concept is defined as a regularity in events designated by a sign or symbol. Events are anything that happen or can be made to happen.

The most important psychological factor is that we can only interpret events, records or transformations of records in terms of the concepts we possess. Since concept learning is an idiosyncratic, sequential process, highly dependent on the individual’s existing concepts at any point in time, instruction must be planned to begin with what the learner already knows and then to modify, extend and reconcile the learner’s concepts.

The events observed in environmental studies are complex; the concepts needed to select appropriate data recording and transforming procedures are numerous; and hence instruction in environmental studies may be substantially enhanced by clarification of epistemological, psychological and curriculum issues.

Keywords

Environmental Education Instructional Material Concept Learning Knowledge Claim Shared Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Atkin, A. 1977. An Information Processing Model of Learning and Problem Solving. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  2. Ausubel, D. P. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ausubel, D. P., J. D. Novak, and H. Hanesian. 1978. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, B. S. 1977. Human Characteristics and School Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Gowin, C. B. 1977. The Domain of Education. Unpublished paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  6. Moreira, M. A. 1977. An Ausubelian Approach to Physics Instruction: An Experiment in an Introductory College Course in Electro- magnetism. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  7. Novak, J. D. 1977a. A Theory of Education. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  8. Novak, J. D. 1977b. An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education. Sci. Educ. 61 (4): 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Postlethwait, S. N., J. D. Novak, and H. Murray. 1972. The Audio Tutorial Approach to Learning through Independent Study and Integral Experience. 3rd ed. Burgess, Minneapolis, Min.Google Scholar
  10. Schaefer, G. 1978. Concept Formation in Biology: The Concept “Growth”. Paper presented at the Environmental Education Symposium, Second International Congress of Ecology. Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  11. Toulmin, S. 1972. Human Understanding, Vol. 1: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  12. Watson, J. D. 1968. The Double Helix. A Signet Book, The New American Library, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph D. Novak
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations