Advertisement

Food Additives and Behavior

The Evidence
  • C. Keith Conners

Abstract

It would be easy for a casual reader to fasten on one or another of the several studies we have reported here and come to quite opposite opinions from those of another reader who is more impressed with a different facet of the evidence. In our first study, we compared children who were following the Feingold diet with children on a pseudodiet and found that greater improvement was seen in the children while on the Feingold diet. Score one for Dr. Feingold. A closer reading, however, shows some discomforting qualifications: the effect only occurred for the teachers, not the parents; the effect occurred more for the children when they had the Feingold diet following the control diet; parents may not have been blind to the treatment; the effect was clearly present in only 2–4 of the 15 children, depending on what level of improvement one selects. Score one for the opposition.

Keywords

Food Allergy Control Diet Food Additive Teacher Rating Stimulant Medication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Keith Conners
    • 1
  1. 1.Children’s Hospital National Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations