Advertisement

Scintillation Camera Collimators

  • G. Muehllehner
Chapter

Abstract

A collimator is essentially a block of lead larger than the detector, containing an arrangement of holes which allows gamma rays to pass through from a specified direction and form the image. The lead thickness is sufficient to absorb unwanted radiation, so that the radiation reaching the detector face must have originated from a known direction. This is determined by the orientation of the hole in the lead. A typical collimator is shown in Fig. 2–1. There are broadly four types of collimators: parallel hole, converging, diverging, and pinhole. They are described below, with particular attention paid to the principle governing the performance of the parallel hole collimator.

Keywords

Modulation Transfer Function Septum Thickness Hole Shape Pinhole Collimator Scintillation Camera 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anger, H.O. (1964), Scintillation camera with multichannel collimators, J. Nucl. Med. 5: 515–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anger, H.O. (1966), Survey of radioisotope cameras, ISA Trans. 5: 311–334.Google Scholar
  3. Bonte, F.J., Graham, K.D., Dowdey, J.E. (1971), Image aberrations produced by multichan-nel collimators for a scintillation camera, Radiology 98: 329–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowdy, J.E., Bonte, F.J. (1972), Principles of scintillation camera image magnification with multichannel converging collimators, Radiology 104: 89–96.Google Scholar
  5. Keller, E. L. (1968), Optimum dimensions of parallel-hole, multi-aperture collimators for gamma-ray cameras, J. Nucl. Med. 9: 233–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kibby, P.M. (1969), The design of multichannel collimators for radioisotope cameras, Br. J. Radiol 42: 91–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. MacIntyre, W.J., Fedoruk, S.O., Harris, C.C., et al. (1969), Sensitivity and resolution in radioisotope scanning, in Medical Radioisotope Scintigraphy, Vol 1, ;IAEA, Vienna, pp. 391–435.Google Scholar
  8. Mather, R.L. (1957), Gamma ray collimator penetration and scattering effects, J. Appl. Phys. 28: 1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moyer, R. A. (1974), A low-energy multi-hole converging collimator compared with a pinhole collimator, J. Nucl. Med. 15: 59–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Muehllehner, G., Luig, H. (1973), Septal penetration in scintillation camera collimators, Phys. Med. Biol 18: 855–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Muehllehner, G., Dudek, J., Moyer, R. (1976), Influence of hole shape on collimator performance, Phys. Med. Biol. 21: 242–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rudin, S„ Bardfeld, P. A., Hart, H. (1971), Use of magnifying multi-hole collimators in the gamma-ray system, J. Nucl. Med. 12: 831–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vetter, H.G., Pizer, S.M. (1971), A measure for radioisotope scan image quality, J, Nucl. Med. 12: 526–529.Google Scholar
  14. Walker, W.G. (1969), The design and analysis of scintillation camera lead collimators using a digital computer, in Medical Radioisotope Scintigraphy, Vol. 1, ;IAEA, Vienna, pp. 545–560.Google Scholar
  15. Wilks, R.J., Mallard, J.R., Taylor, C.G. (1969), The collywobber-A moving collimator image-processing device for stationary detectors in radioisotope scanning, Br. J. Radiol. 42: 705–709.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Muehllehner
    • 1
  1. 1.Searle Diagnostics, Inc.Des PlainesUSA

Personalised recommendations