Advertisement

Intertrial Responses as ‘Rehearsal’: A Study of ‘Overt Thinking’ in Animals

  • O. Hobart Mowrer
Part of the Cognition and Language book series (CALS)

Abstract

The experiment reported in the present chapter was carried out (jointly with Harold Coppock) two years after the one described in Chapter 1, and without any conscious knowledge of a logical relationship between them. Surprisingly enough, however, the second experiment, which pays special attention to the significance and functional utility of intertrial response in an avoidance-learning situation (also alluded to in the first experiment), provides the ideas needed for the development of a truly explanatory or analytical theory of imitation, which, in later chapters, will be referred to as the “autism theory,” because of the assumption that “imitation” develops in situations where the spontaneous occurrence of responses is intrinsically rewarding. In short, the idea is that imitation is the learning that takes place when the occurrence or “rehearsal” of a response which has received primary reinforcement is repeated and perfected, during “intertrial intervals,” because of the secondary reinforcement which the occurrence of the response now provides (see p. 55, Chapter 4).

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Unconditioned Stimulus Intertrial Interval Experimental Situation Conditioning Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, O. D., & Liddell, H. S. Observations on experimental neurosis in sheep. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1935, 34, 330–354.Google Scholar
  2. Garner, W. R. Symbolic processes in the rat: Spontaneous behavior. American Psychologist, 1946, 1, 275.Google Scholar
  3. Hull, C. L. Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. Psychological Review, 1930, 37, 515.Google Scholar
  4. Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.Google Scholar
  5. Konorski, J., & Miller, S. On two types of conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 1937, 16, 264–272. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Konorski, J., & Miller, S. Further remarks on two types of conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology. 1937, 17, 405–407. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lamoreaux, R. R., & Mowrer, O. H. Conditioning as discrimination: A study of “spontaneous” responses and their significances. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge. Havard Graduate School of Education, 1947.Google Scholar
  8. McGeoch, J. A. The psychology of human learning. New York. Longmans, Green, 1942.Google Scholar
  9. Moore, A. U., & Marcuse, F. L. Salivary, cardiac, and motor indices of conditioning in two sows. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1945, 38, 1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mowrer, O. H. Anxiety-reduction and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940, 27, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mowrer, O. H. On the dual nature of learning: A reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving.” Harvard Educational Review, 1945, 15, 35–48.Google Scholar
  12. Mowrer, O. H. Conditioning and conditionality (discrimination). Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mowrer, O. H., & Lamoreaux, R. R. Fear as an intervening variable in avoidance conditioning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1946, 39, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mowrer, O. H., & Ullman, A. D. Time as a determinant in integrative learning. Psychological Review, 1945, 15, 79.Google Scholar
  15. Mowrer, O. H., & Viek, R. Language and learning: An experimental paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 1945, 15, 35–48.Google Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. Two types of conditioned reflex: A reply to Konorski and Miller. Journal of General Psychology, 1937, 16, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolf, I. S., & Kellogg, W. N. Changes in general behavior during flexion conditioning and their importance for the learning process. The American Journal of Psychology, 1940, 53, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woodworth, R. S. Experimental psychology. New York. Henry Holt, 1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Hobart Mowrer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisChampaign-UrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations