Advertisement

Mental Imagery: An Indispensable Psychological Concept

  • O. Hobart Mowrer
Part of the Cognition and Language book series (CALS)

Abstract

As an undergraduate at the University of Missouri (1925–1929), I majored in psychology of a radically behavioristic type. Under the relentless insistence of Professor Max F. Meyer, we students were taught that all behavior consisted of reflexes, innate or conditioned, and that it was quite inadmissible to mention any “mentalistic” concept or phenomenon whatever, “images” being, of course, a salient case in point. Meyer, in his native Germany, had been trained as a physicist, so it was perhaps natural for him to adopt a highly mechanistic approach when, as a result of an extraordinary set of circumstances (Mowrer, 1976), he found himself head of a psychology department. In this respect he antedated John B. Watson by several years. Although he wrote the first psychology text with “behavior” in the title (Meyer, 1911), he did not, however, as Watson (1914, 1919, 1924) was later to do, use the term “behaviorisim;” and, again unlike Watson, he did not establish a “school” and attract a large number of followers. But it was nevertheless under him that I received my “baptism by fire” in systematic behaviorism.

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Learn Theory Classical Conditioning Image Theory Mental Imagery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amsel, A. Hope comes to learning theory. Contemporary Psychology, 1961, 6, 33–36.Google Scholar
  2. Bindra, D. A critique of theories of learning. Mimeographed, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, W. F. There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillside, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Bugelski, B. R. Imagery and verbal behavior. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1977, 1, 39–52.Google Scholar
  5. Curtis, Q. F. The experimental neurosis in the pig. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Minneapolis, September, 1937.Google Scholar
  6. Estes, W. K. Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Hathaway, S. R. An action-potential study of neuromuscular relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Henry Holt, 1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeffrey, W. E. To complete Hobart Mowrer. Contemporary Psychology, 1961, 6, 358–361.Google Scholar
  11. King, D. L. An image theory of classical conditioning. Psychological Reports, 1973, 33, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, D. L. An image theory of instrumental conditioning. Psychological Reports, 1974, 35, 1115–1122. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, D. L. Perception, binocular fusion, and an image theory of classical conditioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 39, 531–537. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, D. L. Learned and perceived reinforcer response strengths and image theory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 7, 438–441.Google Scholar
  15. King, D. L. Bring-about-stimulus and closed-loop instrumental conditioning. Department of Psychology, Howard University, Washington, D.C., 1977 (mimeographed).Google Scholar
  16. Konorski, J. Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  17. Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  18. Lange, N. Beiträge zur Theorie der sinnlichen Aufmerksamkeit und der activen Apperzeption. Philosophishe Studien, 1888, 4, 390–422.Google Scholar
  19. Lindner, R. M. An experimental study of anticipation. American Journal of Psychology, 1938, 51, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLemore, C. W. Factorial validity of imagery measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1976, 14, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMahon, Carol E. Images as motives and motivators: A historical perspective. American Journal of Psychology, 1973, 86, 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, M. F. The fundamental laws of human behavior. Lecturers on the foundations of any mental or social science. Boston: R. G. Badger, 1911.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, N. E. Studies of fear as an acquirable drive. I. Fear as motivation and fearreduction as reinforcement in the learning of a new response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948, 38, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, G. A. Galanter, E. H., & Pribram, K. H. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mowrer, O. H. The modification of vestibular nystagmus by means of repeated elicitation. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 1934, 9, No. 45, p. 48.Google Scholar
  26. Mowrer, O. H. “Maturation” vs. “learning” in the development of vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1936, 48, 383–404.Google Scholar
  27. Mowrer, O. H. Preparatory set (expectancy) — A determinant in motivation and learning. Psychological Review, 1938, 45, 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mowrer, O. H. Preparatory set (expectancy) — Some methods of measurement. Psychological Monographs, 1940, 52, No. 2, p. 43.Google Scholar
  29. Mowrer, O. H. Preparatory set (expectancy) — Further evidence of its “central” locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 28, 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mowrer, O. H. Inter-trial responses as “rehearsal”: A study of “overt thinking” in animals. American Journal of Psychology, 1947, 60, 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mowrer, O. H. Learning theory and personality dynamics. New York: Ronald, 1950.Google Scholar
  32. Mowrer, O. H. The psychologist looks at language. American Psychologist, 1954, 9, 660–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mowrer, O. H. Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mowrer, O. H. Learning theory and the symbolic processes. New York: Wiley, 1960. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mowrer, O. H. Integrity groups: Principles and procedures. The Counseling psychologist, 1972, 3, 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mowrer, O. H. Learning theory and behavior. Huntington, N. Y.: R. E. Krieger, 1973.Google Scholar
  37. Mowrer, O. H., “How does the mind work?” Memorial address in honor of Jerzy Konorski. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 843–857. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mowrer, O. H. The present status of behaviorism. Education, 1976, 94, 4–23. (b)Google Scholar
  39. Mowrer, O. H., & Keehn, J. D. How are inter-trial “avoidance” responses reinforced? Psychological Review, 1958, 65, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mowrer, O. H., Rayman, N. N., & Bliss, E. L. Preparatory set (expectancy) — An experimental demonstration of its “central” locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940, 26, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muenzinger, K. F. Vicarious trial and error at a point of choice. I. A general survey of its relation to learning efficiency. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1938, 53, 75–86.Google Scholar
  42. Myers, C. R. Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1141–1148.Google Scholar
  43. Pavlov, I. P. The reply of a physiologist to psychologists. Psychological Review, 1932, 39, 91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schilder, P. Conditioned reflexes. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1929, 22, 425–443.Google Scholar
  45. Schlosberg, H. Conditioned responses in the white rat. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1934, 45, 303–335.Google Scholar
  46. Shaffer, L. H. Intention and performance. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sidman, M. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior in the white rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1953, 46, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spragg, S. D. S. Anticipatory responses in serial learning by chimpanzees. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 1936, 13, 62.Google Scholar
  49. Thorndike, E. L. The fundamentals of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Upton, M. The auditory sensitivity of guinea pigs. American Journal of Psychology, 1929, 41, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson, J. B. Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Holt, 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, J. B. Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson, J. B. Behaviorism. New York: Norton, 1924.Google Scholar
  54. Weimer, W. B., & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  55. Weinstein, D. J. Imagery and relaxation with a burn patient. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1976, 14, 481–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weaver, E. G. The upper limit of learning in the cat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1930, 10, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiener, N. Cybernetics — or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley, 1948.Google Scholar
  58. Woodworth, R. S. Experimental psychology. New York, 1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Hobart Mowrer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisChampaign-UrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations