Advertisement

Condillac’s Epistemolinguistic Question

  • James H. Stam
Part of the Studies in Applied Psycholinguistics book series (SAP)

Abstract

It is arguable, but it makes good sense nonetheless, to say that Etienne Bonnot de Condillac [1715–1780] was the first thinker to give systematic consideration to “the psycholinguistic question,” as that term is characteristically understood today. Perhaps “epistemolinguistic question” would be the more accurate designation. The question entailed is that of the influence or relationship between language (in particular or in general) and an individual’s mental development. It is a significantly different issue from that posed by so many students of universal or rational grammar in the previous century: the relationship between language, “fully grammatical,” and mind, “fully rational”—a formulation of the problem which focused the genesis neither of language nor of rationality. Nor is Condillac’s epistemolinguistic question entirely the same as the problem of the origin of language per se, one of the most popular topics of late eighteenth-and early nineteenth-century speculation. Again, it is different from the examination of lögos as both reason and speech among the Stoics and earlier Greek philosophers. The epistemolinguistic issue was, to be sure, adumbrated in context by sundry empiricist philosophers: Hobbes and Locke, for example, assigned an appropriate place to language in the sequence of mental faculties and operations.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Human Understanding Linguistic Sign Genetic Epistemology Primitive Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acton, H. B. The philosophy of language in revolutionary France. Proceedings of the British Academy, 1959, 45, 199–219.Google Scholar
  2. Aarsleff, H. The tradition of Condillac: The problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Studies in the history of linguistics: Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1974, pp. 93–156.Google Scholar
  3. Berkeley G. The works (A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, Eds.) (10 vols.). London: Nelson, 1948–1957.Google Scholar
  4. Boas, G. French philosophies of the Romantic period. Baltimore: the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1925; New York: Russell & Russell, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. Bréhier, E. [The eighteenth century (The history of philosophy, vol. V)] (W. Baskin, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago, 1967.Google Scholar
  6. Condillac, E. B. de. An essay on the origin of human knowledge: Being a supplement to Mr. Locke’s Essay on the human understanding (Mr. Nugent, Trans.). London: 1756. Reprinted with an Introduction by J. H. Stam, in Language, man and society: Foundations of the behavioral sciences (R. W. Rieber, Ed.). New York: AMS, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Condillac, E. B. de. Oeuvres (Abbé de Mably, Ed.) (23 vols.). Paris: 1798.Google Scholar
  8. Condillac, E. B. de. Oeuvres complètes (31 vols.). Paris: 1803.Google Scholar
  9. Condillac, E. B. de. [The Logic] (J. Neef, Trans.). Philadelphia: 1809.Google Scholar
  10. Condillac, E. B. de. [Treatise on the sensations] (G. Carr, Trans.; H. Wildon Carr, Intro.). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, School of Philosophy, 1930.Google Scholar
  11. Condillac, E. B. de. Oeuvres philosophiques (G. Le Roy, Ed.) (3 vols). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947–1951.Google Scholar
  12. Cousin, V. Philosophie sensualiste au xviii siècle (5th ed.). Paris: Librairie Académique, 1866.Google Scholar
  13. Diderot, D. [Early philosophical works] (M. Jourdain, Trans, and ed.). Chicago: Open Court, 1916. Reprinted with an Introduction by J. P. Seigel in Language, man and society: Foundations of the behavioral sciences (R. W. Rieber, Ed.). New York: AMS, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Formigari, L. Language and society in the late eighteenth century. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1974, 35, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankel, C. The faith of reason: The idea of progress in the French Enlightenment. New York: King’s Crown Press [Columbia University], 1948.Google Scholar
  16. Gillispie, C. C. The edge of objectivity: An essay in the history of scientific ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press; London: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  17. Givner, D. A. Scientific preconceptions in Locke’s philosophy of language. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1962, 23, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harnois, G. Les théories du langage en France de 1660 à 1821 (in Études françaises). Paris: [1928].Google Scholar
  19. Hartley, D. Observations on man, his frame, his duty, and his expectations (2 vols.). London: 1749.Google Scholar
  20. Josephs, H. Diderot’s dialogue of language and gesture: Le Neveu de Rameau. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Kaye, F. B. The influence of Bernard Mandeville. Studies in Philology, 1922, 19, 86–89.Google Scholar
  22. Kaye, F. B. Mandeville on the origin of language. Modern Language Notes, 1924, 39, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knight, I. F. The geometric spirit: The Abbé de Condillac and the French Enlightenment (Yale Historical Publications, Miscellany 89). New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  24. Kuehner, P. Theories on the origin and formation of language in the eighteenth century in France. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1944.Google Scholar
  25. Le Roy, G. La psychologie de Condillac. Paris: Boivin, 1937.Google Scholar
  26. Lévy-Bruhl, L. History of modern philosophy in France. Chicago: Open Court, 1899/1924.Google Scholar
  27. Locke, J. An essay concerning human understanding. (A Campbell Fraser, Ed.) (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1894.Google Scholar
  28. Lovejoy, A. O. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
  29. Mandeville, B. de. The fable of the bees; Or, private vices, publick benefits (F. B. Kaye, Ed.) (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
  30. Salvucci, P. Linguaggio e mondo umano in Condillac (Pubblicazioni dell’Università di Urbino, Serie di Lettere e Filosofia, Vol. V). Urbino: S. T. E. U., 1957.Google Scholar
  31. Sampson, R. V. Progress in the age of reason: The seventeenth century to the present day. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  32. Schaupp, Z. The naturalism of Condillac (University of Nebraska Studies in Language, Literature, and Criticism, No. 7). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1926.Google Scholar
  33. Seigel, J. P. The enlightenment and the evolution of a language of signs in France and England. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1969, 30, 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seigel, J. P. The perceptible an J the imperceptible: Diderot’s speculation on language in his letters on the deaf and blind. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Psychology of language and thought. New York: Plenum, 1980.Google Scholar
  35. Stam, J. H. Inquiries into the origin of language: The fate of a question. In N. Chomsky & M. Halle (Eds.), Studies in language. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.Google Scholar
  36. Voltaire. [Philosophical letters] (E. Dilworth, Trans, and intro.) (Library of Liberal Arts, Vol. 124). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961.Google Scholar
  37. Warburton, W. The divine legation of Moses (2 vols.). London: 1738–1741.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • James H. Stam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionUpsala CollegeEast OrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations