Cordemoy and ‘Cartesian Linguistics’

  • Karl D. Uitti
Part of the Studies in Applied Psycholinguistics book series (SAP)


It is hard to exaggerate our debt to seventeenth-century thought. So much of what has occurred, intellectually speaking, in more recent times may be traced back to arguments developed by representatives of the grand siècle. Even the techniques of diffusion current then—learned academies, rapid translations (usually into Latin, but often into other vernaculars), exchange of correspondence—remain ours today and have been only partially supplanted. If, as is frequently the case, antiquity or the Middle Ages are also involved, the perspective taken by present-day thinkers has usually been first conditioned by viewpoints proper to seventeenth-century thought. Consequently, even philosophers of the second or third rank deserve our close attention. Next to the giants—Galileo, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Leibniz, Malebranche—a host of lesser figures cope, so to speak, on a day-to-day basis with an astonishingly wide variety of concepts and concerns. (These notions usually grow out of the vast philosophical systems assembled by the great thinkers.) Some examples are rather startling.


Seventeenth Century Historical Epistemology Curious Theory Pure Spirit Perfect Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aarsleff, H. The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky. Language, 1970, 46, 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, A. Histoire de la littérature française au XVIIe siècle. Vols. 1–5 (especially Vol. 3). Paris: Domat, Montchrestien, 1948–1956. (Also: Paris: Del Duca, 1962–1968.)Google Scholar
  3. Arnauld, A., & Lancelot, C. Grammaire générale et raisonnée contenant les fondemens de l’art de parler… Paris: Chez Pierre le Petit, 1660.Google Scholar
  4. Battail, J.-F. L’avocat philosophe Géraud de Cordemoy (1624–1684). La Haye: M. Nijhoff, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. Boas, G. Dominant themes of modem philosophy. New York: Ronald Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  6. Bouillier, F. C. Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne. Paris: C. Delagrave, 18683.Google Scholar
  7. Bréhier, E. The history of philosophy: the seventeenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966. (French original: Paris, 1938.)Google Scholar
  8. Brekle, H. E. Forematter to reprint of G. de Cordemoy, Discours physique de la parole. Facsimile reprint of 1677 edition. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Brekle, H. E. Quelques aspects linguistiques et psychologiques dans le Discours physique de la parole (1677) de Géraud de Cordemoy. In H.-J. Niederehe and H. Haarmann (Eds.), Im memoriam Friedrich Diez: Akten des Kolloquiums zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Romanistik. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Brunot, F. Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1900. Vol. 6 No. 2 by A. François. Paris: A. Colin, 1932. (See, especially, “La grammaire et les grammairiens.”)Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
  13. Clérico, G. F. Sanctius: Histoire d’une réhabilitation. In A. Joly & J. Stéfanini (Eds.), La grammaire générale des modistes aux idéologues. Lille: Publications de l’Université de Lille, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Condillac, E. B. de. Essai sur l’origine des connoissances humaines (Paris, 1746). (See edition of Condillac’s works prepared by G. LeRoy. Vols. 1–3. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947–1951.)Google Scholar
  15. Condillac, E. B. de. Traité des systêmes (Paris 1749 [17712]). (See edition of Condillac’s works prepared by G. LeRoy. Vols. 1–3. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947–1951.)Google Scholar
  16. Cordemoy, G. de. Œuvres philosophiques, avec une étude biobibliographique. Édition critique présentée par P. Clair et F. Girbal. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1968. (Contains the text of the first six Discours [= the Discernement] the Discours physique de la parole, the Lettre écrite au R. P. Cossart [= “Sçavant religieux”], and other treatises.)Google Scholar
  17. Cordemoy, G. de. A philosophic all discourse concerning speech (1668) and a discourse written to a learned frier (1670). New York: AMS Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  18. Damiron, J.-P. Essai sur l’histoire de la philosophie en France au XVIIe siècle. Vol 2. Paris: Hachette, 1846.Google Scholar
  19. Descartes, R. Correspondance. Ch. Adam and G. Milhaud (Eds.). Vol. 1. Paris: Alcan, 1936.Google Scholar
  20. Descartes, R. Philosophical works. Translated by E. S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross. New York: Dover Publications, 1955.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, J. Hermes, or a philosophical inquiry concerning universal grammar. Fourth, revised edition. London: C. Nourse, 1786. (A photographic reprint of this text is provided, with a Preface by K. D. Uitti, in Vol. 1 of Harris’s Works. New York: AMS Press, 1975.)Google Scholar
  22. Harris, J. Hermès, ou recherches philosophiques sur la grammaire universelle; traduction et remarques par François Thurot (1796). Facsimile edition, Introduction and Notes by A. Joly. Geneva-Paris: Droz, 1972. (A superbly annotated text.)Google Scholar
  23. Joly, A. La linguistique cartésienne: une erreur mémorable. In A. Joly and J. Stefanini (Eds.), La grammaire générale des modistes aux idéologues. Lille: Publications de l’Université de Lille, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, J. J. The philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Knight, I. F. The geometric spirit. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. Pellisson, P., & D’Olivet, P.-J. Histoire de l’Académie française. Ch.-L. Livet (Ed.), Vols. 1–2. Paris: Didier, 1858.Google Scholar
  27. Racine, J. Œuvres. P. Mesnard (Ed.), Vol. 4. Paris: Hachette, 1886.Google Scholar
  28. Rivaud, A. Histoire de la philosophie: l’époque classique. Vol. 3. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar
  29. Rodis-Lewis, G. Un théoricien du langage au XVIIe siècle: Bernard Lamy. Français Moderne, 1968, 36, 19–50.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenfield, L. D. From beast-machine to man-machine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
  31. Ryle, G. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.Google Scholar
  32. Sanctius, F. [Sanchez de las Brozas], Minerva seu de causis linguœ latinœ commentarius [1587], add. by G. Scoppius and J. Perizonius. C. L. Bauerus (Ed.). Leipzig: J. A. Barthius, 1793.Google Scholar
  33. Ueberweg, F. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosphie. Vol. 3. Basel: Schwabe, 195313.Google Scholar
  34. Uitti, K. D. Descartes and Port-Royal in two diverse retrospects. Romance Philology, 1969, 23, 75–85.Google Scholar
  35. Uitti, K. D. James Harris’ Hermes in the context of revolutionary France: the translations and commentaries by François Thurot. In J. Macary (Ed.), Essays on the age of enlightenment in honor of Ira O. Wade. Geneva: Droz, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. Vartanian, A. La Mettrie’s l’Homme machine: A study in the origins of an idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  37. Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmer, K. Review of Chomsky (1966). International Journal of American Linguistics, 1968, 34, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl D. Uitti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Romance Languages and LiteraturesPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations