Advertisement

Theoretical and Historical Roots of Psycholinguistic Research

  • R. W. Rieber
  • Harold Vetter
Part of the Studies in Applied Psycholinguistics book series (SAP)

Abstract

Psycholinguistics can be said to have originated as far back in the history of philosophy as one cares to trace psychology. The widespread use of the term psycholinguistics and the development of a distinct discipline with that title, however, go back only to the early 1950s, when George Miller, Charles Osgood, and other psychologists introduced a knowledge of linguistics into the psychological study of language.1 Prior to that time, psychological studies of “verbal learning” dated from the concern of Ebbinghaus (1885) with memory and are tied to a strand of theory that can be followed back to the associationism of Locke [1632–1704]. To the extent that verbal learning theorists in psychology were almost totally lacking in linguistic sophistication, it might be said that their research interests represented precisely what psycholinguistics was not.

Keywords

Human Language Deaf Child Philosophical Transaction Historical Root Deaf People 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarsleff, H. The study of language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  2. Abercrombie, D. Studies in phonetics and linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Amman, J. C. A dissertation on speech. [Reprint of the 1893 edition (R. W. Rieber, Ed.)]Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, Francis (Ed.). The works of Francis Bacon. Spedding, London: Ellis and Heath, 1858.Google Scholar
  5. Benton, A. L., & Joynt, R. J. Early description of aphasia. Arch. Neurol., 1960, 3, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bever, T. G. Some theoretical and empirical issues that arise if we insist on distinguishing language and thought. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics and communication disorders. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Bloomfield, L. Language. New York: Henry Holt, 1933.Google Scholar
  8. Blumenthal, A. L. Language and psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Brett, G. S. A history of psychology (Vol. 2). London: George Allen and Unwin, 1921.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. Words and things. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, J. B. Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. Three models for the description of language. Proceedings of the Symposium on Information Theory, IRE-Transactions on Information Theory, 1956, 2, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Condillac, E. B. de. An essay on the origin of human knowledge. Introduction by J. H. Stam. Published originally in French 1746; published London 1756. [Reprinted in Language, man, and society series (R. W. Rieber, Ed.), A.M.S. Press, 1975.]Google Scholar
  16. Condillac, E. B. de. The logic of Condillac. Philadelphia, Pa., 1809.Google Scholar
  17. Cordemoy, G. de. A philosophical discourse concerning speech. Introduction by Karl Uitti, London, 1668. [Reprinted in Language, man, and society series (R. W. Rieber, Ed.), A.M.S. Press, 1975.]Google Scholar
  18. Dalgarno, G. Ars Signorum, vulgo Character Universalis et Lingua Philosophica, London, 1661.Google Scholar
  19. Dalgarno, G. Didascalocophus or The deaf and dumb man’s tutor, to which is added a discourse of the nature and number of double consonants. Oxford: 1680.Google Scholar
  20. Darwin, C. The descent of man. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: 1873.Google Scholar
  22. Darwin, E. The temple of nature. New York: P. and J. Swords, 1804. (Originally published London, 1803.)Google Scholar
  23. Darwin, E. Zoonomia, or the laws of organic life. Introduction by T. Verhave, London, 1794–1796. [Reprinted in Language, man, and society series (R. W. Rieber, Ed.), A.M.S. Press, 1974.]Google Scholar
  24. Diderot, Denis. Diderot’s early works. Introduction by Jules Paul Siegel (includes essay on the deaf and dumb), Open Court, 1916. [Reprinted in Language, man, and society series (R. W. Rieber, Ed.), A.M.S. Press, 1975.]Google Scholar
  25. Diebold, A. R. A survey of psycholinguistic research, 1954–1964. In Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. Bloomington, Ind.: University of Indiana Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  26. Dobson, E. J. English pronunciation 1500–1700 (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  27. Ebbinghaus, H. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover: 1964 (English trans.). (Originally published in Germany, 1885.)Google Scholar
  28. Firth, J. R. The English school of phonetics. T.P.S., 1946, 12, 69.Google Scholar
  29. Fouts, R. W. The use of guidance in teaching sign language to a chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972, 80, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fouts, R. S. Acquisition and testing of gestural signs in four young chimpanzees. Science, 1973, 180, 978–980. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fouts, R. S. Capacities for language in great apes. Paper prepared for the 9th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Chicago, September 1973.Google Scholar
  32. Funke, O. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Anglistik und zur Sprachtheorie. Berne: 1965.Google Scholar
  33. Furth, H. G. On the nature of language from the perspective of research with profoundly eaf children. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics nd communication disorders. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 1969, 65, 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gardner, B. T., & Gardner, R. A. Two-way communication with an infant-chimpanzee. In. A. Schrier & F. Strollnitz (Eds.), Behavior of non-human primates. New York: Cademic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  36. Goldstein, K. Language and language disorders. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1948.Google Scholar
  37. Griffith, F. G. De Italica Pronuntiatione. Italian Studies, 1953, 8, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartley, D. Observations on man. London: S. Richardson, 1749.Google Scholar
  39. Hayes, C. The ape in our house. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.Google Scholar
  40. Hebb, D. O., Lambert, W. E., & Tucker, G. R. A DMZ in the language war. Psychology Today, 1973, 11, 55–62.Google Scholar
  41. Hewes, G. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology, 1973, 14, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holder, W. Elements of speech: An essay of inquiry into the natural production of letters: With an appendix concerning persons deaf and dumb. London: 1669.Google Scholar
  43. Humboldt, W. von Linguistic variability and intellectual development (English trans, by G. C. Buck, F. A. Raben). University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. (Originally published in German, 1836.)Google Scholar
  44. Ivič, M. Trends in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.Google Scholar
  45. Kantor, J. R. An objective psychology of grammar. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Publications, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kellogg, W. N. Communication and language in the home-raised chimpanzee. Science, 1968, 162, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kemp, J. A. John Wallis’ grammar of the English language. London: Longman, 1972.Google Scholar
  48. Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  49. Leibnitz, G. W. New Essays concerning human understanding. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lieberman, P., Crelin, E. S., & Klatt, D. H. Phonetic ability and related anatomy of the newborn and adult human, Neanderthal man, and the chimpanzee. American Anthropologist, 1972, 74, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Locke, J. An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. (Originally published, 1690.)Google Scholar
  52. Maclay, H. Linguistics and psycholinguistics. In B. Kachru (Ed.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  53. Marx, O. The history of the biological basis of language. In E. H. Lenneberg (Ed.), Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  54. Mendelssohn, M. Psychologische Betrachtungen auf Veranlassung einer von spalding. Mag. Erfahrungsseelenkunde, 1783, 1(pt. 3). (Berlin)Google Scholar
  55. Morgagni, G. B. The seat and causes of disease (Book I). Letter XIV, London: 1769.Google Scholar
  56. Morton, J., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.). Psycholinguistics: Developmental and pathological. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  57. Müller, F. Max. Science of thought. London: Longman’s Green, 1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Müller, F. Max. Three lectures on the science of language. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1890.Google Scholar
  59. Müller, F. Max. Three introductory lectures on the science of thought. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1909.Google Scholar
  60. Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  61. Osgood, C. A dinosaur caper. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics and communication disorders. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1975.Google Scholar
  62. Pick, A. Aphasia. In J. W. Brown (Ed.), Aphasia. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1973.Google Scholar
  63. Premack, A. J., & Premack, D. Teaching language to an ape. Scientific American, 1972, 227, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Preyer, W. The mind of the child. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1896. (Originally published in Germany, 1881.)Google Scholar
  65. Pronko, N. H. Language and psycholinguistics: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1946, 43. Google Scholar
  66. Rieber, R. W. Neuropsychological aspects of stuttering and cluttering. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The neuropsychology of language. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rieber, R. W., & Froeschels, E. An historical review of the European literature in speech pathology. In R. W. Rieber & R. S. Brubaker (Eds.), Speech pathology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1966.Google Scholar
  68. Robins, R. H. A short history of linguistics. London: Longman, 1967.Google Scholar
  69. Rosenfield, L. C. From beast machine to man machine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
  70. Sapir, E. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1921.Google Scholar
  71. Saporta, S. Psycholinguistics: A book of readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
  72. Schlesinger, I. M. The grammar of sign language, and the problems of language universals. In J. Morton (Ed.), Biological and social factors in psycholinguistics. London: Logos Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  73. Stam, J. H. Inquiries into the origin of language. New York: Harper, 1976.Google Scholar
  74. Stam, J. H. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in historical perspective. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), The roots of American psychology. New York: New York Academy of Science, 1977.Google Scholar
  75. Stokoe, W. Motor signs as the first form of language. Paper presented at the 71st annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Toronto, December 1972.Google Scholar
  76. Sullivan, J. On Cartesian linguistics. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), The roots of American psychology. New York: New York Academy of Science, 1977.Google Scholar
  77. van Helmont, F. M. B. Alphabeti vere Naturalis Hebraici brevissima delineatio. Sulzback: 1667.Google Scholar
  78. Vartanian, A. La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine. In A study of the origins of an idea. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  79. Wallis, J. Grammatica linguae anglicanae cui praefigitur, de loquela sive sonorum formatione, tractatus grammatico-physicus. Oxford: 1653.Google Scholar
  80. Wallis, J. A letter of Doctor John Wallis to Robert Boyle, Esq. Philosophical Transactions. 1670, 5, N. 61, 1087–97 (Page refs. to Lock, 1706.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wallis, J. A defence of the Royal Society, and the philosophical transactions, particularly those of July, 1670, in answer to the cavils of Dr. William Holder. London: 1678.Google Scholar
  82. Wallis, J. A letter of Dr. John Wallis… to Mr. Thomas Beverly concerning his methods for instructing persons deaf and dumb. Philosophical Transactions, 1698, 20, N. 245, 353–60. (Page refs. to Lock, 1706.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whitney, W. D. Language and the study of language. New York: Charles Scribner, 1871.Google Scholar
  84. Wilkins, J. Mercury: or, the secret and swift messenger. 1641. (Page refs. to Wilkins, 1802, 1–87.)Google Scholar
  85. Wilkins, J. An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language. London: 1668.Google Scholar
  86. Wilson, M. Descartes and the mind body problem. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Body and mind. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Rieber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Harold Vetter
    • 3
  1. 1.John Jay College of Criminal JusticeCUNYNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations