Conditioned Ethanol Tolerance

  • Lorne F. Parker
  • Joseph D. Skorupski


While it is evident that conditioning is involved in the development of drug addictions, the specific etiological role (or roles) of conditioning has not yet been clearly delineated. Some believe that addiction is maintained via addicts learning to avoid withdrawal stress through self-administration (Beach, 1957), while others have suggested that the reinforcing effects of drugs are sufficient to maintain operantly conditioned self-administration (Schuster & Villarreal, 1968). Wikler (1971) has further pointed out that environmental situations that regularly surround drug administration or withdrawal stress may also gain conditioned positive or negative reinforcement qualities, respectively.


Home Cage Depressant Effect Ethanol Tolerance Morphine Tolerance Behavioral Tolerance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aston, R. 1965. Quantitative aspects of tolerance and post-tolerance hypersensitivity to phenobarbital in the rat. J. Pharmac. Exp. Therap. 150: 253–258.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, H.D. 1957. Morphine addiction in rats. Canad. J. Psychol. 11: 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, C.S. 1968. A study of the alcohol-tolerance effect and an in- troduction of a new behavioral technique. Psychopharmacologia 12: 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebert, A.G., Yim, G.K.W. and Miya, T.S. 1964. Distribution and metabolism of barbital-14C in tolerant and nontolerant rats. Biochem. Pharmacol. 12: 1267–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalant, H., Le Blanc, A.E. and Gibbins, R.J. 1971. Tolerance to and dependence on, some non-opiate psychotropic drugs. Pharmacol. Rev. 23: 135–190.Google Scholar
  6. Le Blanc, A.E., Gibbins, R.J. and Kalant, H. 1973. Behavioral augmentation of tolerance to ethanol in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 30: 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Le Blanc, A.E., Gibbins, R.J. and Kalant, H. 1975. Generalization of behaviorally augmented tolerance to ethanol, and its relation to physical dependence. Psychopharmacologia 44: 241–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Le Blanc, A.E., Gibbins, R.J. and Kalant, H. 1976. Acquisition and loss of behaviorally augmented tolerance to ethanol in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 48: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Milner, G. 1968. Modified confinement motor activity test for use with mice. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 57: 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newman, H. and Card, J. 1937. Duration of acquired tolerance to ethyl alcohol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 59: 249–252.Google Scholar
  11. Newman, H.W. and Lehman, A.J. 1938. Nature of acquired tolerance to alcohol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 62: 301–306.Google Scholar
  12. Schuster, C.R. and Villarreal, J.E. 1968. Psychopharmacology: A Review of Progress. Washington, D.C., PHS Publ. 1836, U.S. Gov’t. Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Siegel, S. 1975. Evidence from rats that morphine tolerance is a learned response. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 89: 498–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Siegel, S. 1976. Morphine analgesic tolerance: Its situation specifically supports a Pavlovian conditioning model. Science 193: 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Siegel, S. 1977. Morphine tolerance acquisition as an associative process. J. Exp. Psych: Animal Behay. Processes 3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wallgren, H. and Lindbohm, R. 1961. Adaptation to ethanol in rats with special reference to brain tissue respiration. Biochem. Pharmacol. 8: 423–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wikler, A. 1971. Some implications of conditioning theory for problems of drug abuse. Behay. Sci. 16: 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorne F. Parker
    • 1
  • Joseph D. Skorupski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations