Environmental Testing

  • C. W. Gehrs
  • B. R. Parkhurst
  • D. S. Shriner
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 15)


Environmental toxicology is a term that conveys different images to different people. In its broadest sense environmental toxicology encompasses all of the research necessary to evaluate the potential ecological effects, to determine the ultimate fate in the environment, and to identify critical pathways to man that might occur as the result of release of a particular material (Table 1). Evaluation of the potential toxicity of the material can be accomplished through three types of testing: short-term bioassays (environmental screening); subacute organismic, population, community, and ecosystem evaluation; and mechanistic studies. The latter two types are resource intense in that they generally require substantial manpower and time commitments. However, they are also essential for developing predictive capabilities regarding the potential for long-term chronic environmental effects resulting from the release of a complex effluent stream. Environmental screening, on the other hand, requires less manpower with results often obtained in less than a week’s time.


Environmental Toxicology Original Mixture Environmental Screening Seed Germination Test Potential Ecological Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Loomis TA: Essentials of Toxicology. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1970, p 162Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guerin MR, Clark BR, Ho CH, Epler JL, Rao TI: Short-term bioassays of complex organic mixtures: Part 1. Chemistry. Application of Short-term Bioassays in the Fractionation and Analysis of Complex Environmental Mixtures (1978) EPA-60019–78–027.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santelmann PW: Herbicide bioassay. In: Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society, 177, pp 79–88Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finney DJ: Statistical Methods in Biological Activity. London, Griffin Press, 1971, 2nd EditionGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marking LL, Dawson VK: Method for assessment of toxicity of efficacy mixtures of chemicals. Investigations in Fish Control No. 67, U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Services, Washington, D.C., 1975Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheets TJ: Effects of soil type and time on herbicidal activity of CDAA, CDEC, and EPTC. Weeds 7:442–448, 1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Upchurch RP: The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:442–448, 1959Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin IB, Guerin MR, Hardigree AA, Epier JL: Fractionation of synthetic crude oils from coal for biological testing. Environmental Research 12:358–365, 1976ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parkhurst BR, Gehrs CW, Rubin IB: The value of chemical fractionation for identifying the toxic components of complex aqueous effluents. Proceedings of ASTM 2nd Annual Symp. on Aquatic Toxicology. Cleveland, in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herbes SE, Southworth GR, Gehrs CW: Organic contaminants in aqueous coal conversion effluents: Environmental consequences and research priorities. Proceedings of Trace Substances in Environmental Health-X, (Hemphill DD, ed.), University of Missouri, Columbia, 1977, pp 295–303Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Gehrs
    • 1
  • B. R. Parkhurst
    • 1
  • D. S. Shriner
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations