Optokinetic Nystagmus and Single-cell Responses in the Nucleus Tractus Opticus After Early Monocular Deprivation in the Cat

  • K.-P. Hoffmann
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 27)


The normal cat’s optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) can be elicited in the two horizontal directions even if one eye is stimulated alone. After early monocular deprivation OKN is only elicited by patterns moving from temporal to nasal if either the deprived or the non-deprived eye is stimulated alone. A specific class of neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in the pretectum of normal cats can be identified by the following criteria: (1) large area patterns rich in contour are the most effective visual stimuli; (2) all neurons in the left NOT are strongly excited by movements from right to left and all neurons in the right NOT by movements from left to right; (3) effective stimulus velocities are within a broad range of less than 0.1 deg/sec to greater than 50 deg/sec; (4) latency differences to electrical stimulation of the optic chiasma and optic tract indicate slow conducting (W-cell) retinal input to these NOT neurons; (5) all neurons could be antidromically activated from the inferior olive; (6) the neurons recorded in the NOT were either binocularly driven preferring the same direction in visual space in each eye (40%) or were activated only through the contralateral eye (60%).

After six months of early monocular deprivation the properties of NOT neurons listed above remained largely unaltered except that neurons in each NOT could only be influenced from the contralateral eye irrespective of whether it was the deprived one or not. This is considered to be the explanation for the asymmetry of OKN after early visual deprivation.


Visual Cortex Optic Tract Optic Chiasma Inferior Olive Optokinetic Nystagmus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Collewijn, H. (1975). Direction-selective units in the rabbit’s nucleus of the optic tract. Brain Res. 100:489–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoffmann, K.-P., K. Behrend, and A. Schoppmann (1976). A direct afferent visual pathway from the nucleus of the optic tract to the inferior olive in the cat. Brain Res. 115:150–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoffmann, K.-P., and A. Schoppmann (1975). Retinal input to direction-selective cells in the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat. Brain Res. 99:359–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Norton, Thomas T. (1974). Receptive-field properties of superior colliculus cells and development of visual behavior in kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 37:674–690.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schoppmann, A., and K.-P. Hoffmann (1976). Continuous mapping of direction-selectivity in the cat’s visual cortex. Neuroscience Letters 2:177–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stein, Barry E., E. Labos, and L. Kruger (1973). Determinants of response latency in neurons of superior colliculus in kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 36:680–689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takeda, T., and K. Maekawa (1976). The origin of the pretecto-olivary tract. A study using the horseradish peroxidase method. Brain Res. 117:319–325.Google Scholar
  8. van Hof-van Duin, J. (1978). Direction-preference of optokinetic responses in monocularly tested normal kittens and light-deprived cats. Arch. ital. Biol. 116:471–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wood, C. C., P. D. Spear, and J. J. Braun (1973). Direction-specific deficits in horizontal optokinetic nystagmus following removal of visual cortex in the cat. Brain Res. 60:231–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.-P. Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Vergleichende NeurobiologieUniversität UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations