Advertisement

The Nature of the Nerve Fibre Guidance Mechanism Responsible for the Formation of an Orderly Central Visual Projection

  • S. M. Bunt
  • T. J. Horder
  • K. A. C. Martin
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 27)

Abstract

Theories about the formation of patterned nerve connections have generally required a detailed, highly specific recognition between individual nerve fibres and their targets, or other fibres, based on unique matching cytochemical cues. A re-examination of the published data, together with new data from experiments on the retinotectal system of lower vertebrates, suggests that a considerable amount of the data can be accounted for by more simple mechanisms such as the maintenance of nearest neighbour relationships between growing fibres through the non-specific process of fasciculation and the contact guidance of fibres to their termination sites. These simple morphogenetic mechanisms are insufficient to explain the fibre selectivity in tissue exchanges between different tectal sites, or the reorientation of the optic projection after rotation of the fibre array or its target tissue. High degrees of retinal and tectal differences need not be invoked to account for the results of graft exchanges since the selectivity of the fibres is of a low order. Non-specific factors such as fibre-fibre competition, varying densities of fibre subpopulations and variable accessibility of different fibres to different tectal regions could account for the findings. The data presented suggest that fibres may respond to the same polarity cue throughout the tectum but that on occasions highly ordered projections are formed without reference to these cues. The mechanisms responsible for polarity control remain speculative but might involve generalized properties, such as tissue maturity, which could act cumulatively along the length of the optic pathway to orient the fibres, and not solely in their target tissue.

Keywords

Optic Nerve Optic Tectum Polarity Control Optic Projection Contact Guidance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bunt, S. M., and T. J. Horder (1977). A proposal regarding the significance of simple mechanical events, such as the development of the choroid fissure, in the organization of central visual projections. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 272:10–12P.Google Scholar
  2. Bunt, S. M., and T. J. Horder (1978). Evidence for an orderly arrangement of optic axons in the central pathways of vertebrates and its implications for the formation and regeneration of optic projections. Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts, Eighth Annual Meeting, p. 468.Google Scholar
  3. Bunt, S. M., T. J. Horder, and K. A. C. Martin (1978). Evidence that optic fibres regenerating across the goldfish tectum may be assigned termination sites on a “first come, first served” basis. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 276:45–46P.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, J. E., and T. J. Horder (1974). Interactions between optic fibres in their regeneration to specific sites in the goldfish tectum. J. Physiol (Lond.) 241:89–90P.Google Scholar
  5. Hope, R. A., B. J. Hammond, and R. M. Gaze (1976). The arrow model: retinotectal specificity and map formation in the goldfish visual system. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 194:447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Horder, T. J., and K. A. C. Martin (1977). Translocation of optic fibres in the tectum may be determined by their stability relative to surrounding fibre terminals. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 271:23:24P.Google Scholar
  7. Horder, T. J., and K. A. C. Martin (1978). Morphogenetics as an alternative to chemospecificity in the formation of nerve connections. In: Cell-Cell Recognition. Society for Experimental Biology Symposium 32. A. S. G. Curtis (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 275–358.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobson, M., and R. L. Levine (1975a). Plasticity in the adult frog brain: filling the visual scotoma after excision or translocation of parts of the optic tectum. Brain Res. 88:339–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobson, M., and R. L. Levine (1975b). Stability of implanted duplicate tectal positional markers serving as targets for optic axons in adult frogs. Brain Res. 92:468–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levine, R. L., and M. Jacobson (1975). Discontinuous mapping of retina onto tectum innervated by both eyes. Brain Res. 98:172–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin, K. A. C. (1978). Combination of fibre-fibre competition and regional tectal differences accounting for the results of tectal graft experiments in goldfish. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 276:44–45P.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, R. L., and R. W. Sperry (1976). Retinotectal specificity: chemoaffinity theory. In: Neural and Behavioural Specificity, Vol. 3. Studies on the development of behaviour and the nervous system. G. Gottlieb (ed.). Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–149.Google Scholar
  13. Ramón y Cajal, S. (1928). Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System. R. M. May (translator). Hafner, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  14. Sharma, S. C. (1973). Anomalous retinal projection after removal of contralateral optic tectum in adult goldfish. Exp. Neurol. 41:661–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharma, S. C. (1975). Visual projection in surgically created “compound” tectum in adult goldfish. Brain Res. 93:497–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sperry, R. W. (1951). Regulative factors in the orderly growth of neural circuits. Growth (10th Symp.) 15:63–87.Google Scholar
  17. Straznicky, K., R. M. Gaze, and T. J. Horder (1979). Selection of appropriate medial brachium of the optic tract by fibres of ventral retinal origin during development and in regeneration: an autoradiographic study in Xenopus. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Bunt
    • 1
  • T. J. Horder
    • 1
  • K. A. C. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human AnatomyOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations