Development of Optokinetic Nystagmus in the Human Infant and Monkey Infant: an Analogue to Development in Kittens

  • J. Atkinson
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 27)


One permanent effect of monocular deprivation on visual behaviour in kittens is that optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in monocular viewing can only be elicited for temporal to nasal field movement; movement of the stimulus nasally to temporally elicits either no response or irregular saccades. In the present study, this condition is called “asymmetrical OKN.” Asymmetrical OKN has also been previously observed in kittens under approximately 4 weeks of age.

In the present study, the development of OKN, with monocular viewing in human infants to random noise patterns, has been investigated. The results of these experiments demonstrate that infants up to about 3 months of age give asymmetrical OKN, although binocularly they give OKN in both directions. There is a gradual change-over to symmetrical OKN between 2 and 3 months of age. Preliminary results on monkey infants show a similar asymmetry over the first two to three weeks of life. Studies of OKN in human clinical cases of early binocular deprivation (strabismus, ptosis), in general, support the idea that early loss of binocularity prevents the normal development of some corticotectal connections controlling OKN.


Human Infant Field Movement Stimulus Field Optokinetic Nystagmus Stereoscopic Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appel, M. A., and J. J. Campos (1977). Binocular disparity as a discriminable stimulus parameter for young infants. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 23:47–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J., and O. Braddick (1976). Stereoscopic discrimination in infants. Perception 5:29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, B., V. Matsuo, and T. Raphan (1977). Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after-nystagmus. J. Physiol. 270:321–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Collewijn, H. (1976). Direction-selective units in the rabbit’s nucleus of the optic tract. Brain Res. 100:489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crone, R. A. (1977). Amblyopia: the pathology of motor disorders in amblyopic eyes. Docum. ophthal. Proceedings Series. Experimental and Clinical Amblyopia XIIIth I.S.C.E.R.G. Symposium 45:9–18.Google Scholar
  6. Fox, R. (1978). Testing stereopsis in animals and human infants. In: Visual Deprivation Effects in Animals and Their Analogs in Human Visual Pathology. University of Rochester, Center for Visual Science, Eleventh Symposium.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffmann, K.-P., and A. Schoppmann (1975). Retinal input to the direction-selective cells of the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat. Brain Res. 99:359–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffmann, K.-P. (1977). Visual response of neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract of visually deprived cats. Soc. for Neuroscience, 7th Annual Meeting, Abstracts (vol. III).Google Scholar
  9. van Hof-van Duin, J. (1976). Early and permanent effects of monocular deprivation on pattern discrimination and visuomotor behavior in cats. Brain Res. 111:261–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. van Hof-van Duin, J. (1978). Direction preference of optokinetic responses in monocularly tested normal kittens and light-deprived cats. Arch. Ital. Biol. 116:471–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Atkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations