Advertisement

Three Theories of Cortical Function

  • H. B. Barlow
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 27)

Abstract

Ralph Freeman asked me, as an introduction to this meeting, to try to give you some kind of review of the present status of knowledge in the field of cortical development. The more I looked into it, the more confused I became. There has been a lot of papers published, and these, of course, all constitute local advances; but overall the situation has not, in my view, changed very significantly since I tried to review it three years ago (Barlow, 1975), or even before that date. It is as if we were winning all the battles, but losing the war, and when that sort of thing happens, it’s a sure sign that you don’t know what the war is all about. I began to wonder if the trouble with work on the development of the cortex is that we have not identified the problem or problems correctly.

Keywords

Granule Cell Receptive Field Retinal Image Primary Visual Cortex Pupil Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow, H. B. (1952). Eye movements during fixation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 116:269–306.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1:371–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, H. B. (1974). Inductive influence, coding, perception and language. Perception 3:123–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, H. B. (1975). Visual experience and cortical development. Nature 258:199–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow, H. B., R. Narsimhan, and A. Rosenfeld (1972). Visual pattern analysis of machines and animals. Science 177:567–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow, H. B., and B. C. Reeves (1979). The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Blakemore, C., and F. W. Campbell (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 203:237–260.Google Scholar
  8. Bracewell, R. (1965). The Fourier Transform and Its Applications. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Burr, D. C. (1975). A second binocular depth perception system. B.Sc. thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Burr, D. C. (1979). Acuity for apparent vernier offset. Vision Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Burr, D. C., and J. Ross (1979). How binocular delay gives information about depth. Vision Res. (in press, August 1978).Google Scholar
  12. Cherry, C. (1957). On Human Communication. Science Editions, Inc., New York; M.I.T. Press and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Cynader, M., J. Gardner, and R. Douglas (1979). Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic depth perception in cat visual cortex. In: Frontiers of Vision Research, S. J. Cool and E. L. Smith, III (eds.), Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Ditchburn, R. W., and B. L. Ginsberg (1952). Vision with a stabilized retinal image. Nature 170:36–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enroth-Cugell, C., and J. G. Robson (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 187:517–552.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, R. S., L. J. Garey, and T. P. S. Powell (1973). Patterns of degeneration after intrinsic lesions of the visual cortex (area 17) of the monkey. Brain Res. 53:208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert, C. D. (1977). Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 268:391–421.Google Scholar
  19. Gilinsky, A. S. (1967). Masking of contour-detectors in the human visual system. Psychon. Sci. 8:395–396.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, L. (1969). Moiré effect from random dots. Nature 223:578–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glass, L., and R. Perez (1973). Perception of random dot interference patterns. Nature 246:360–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 148:574–591.Google Scholar
  23. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel (1977). Ferrier Lecture: Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 198:1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall, W. H., and S. A. Talbot (1942). Recent evidence for neural mechanisms in vision leading to a general theory of sensory acuity. Biological Symposia (J. Cattell, ed.) 7:117–164.Google Scholar
  25. Marr, D. (1976). Early processing of visual information. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 275:483–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgan, M. (1975). Stereoillusion based on visual persistence. Nature 256:639–640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, M. J. (1976). Pulfrich effect and the filling in of apparent motion. Perception 5:187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan, M. J., and P. Thompson (1975). Apparent motion and the Pulfrich effect. Perception 4:3–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan, M. J., and D. F. Turnbull (1978). Smooth eye tracking and the perception of motion in the absence of real movement. Vision Res. 18:1053–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pantle, A., and R. Sekuler (1968). Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision. Science 162:1146–1148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratliff, F. (1952). The role of physiological nystagmus in monocular acuity. J. exp. Psychol. 43:163–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riggs, L. A., F. Ratliff, J. C. Cornsweet, and T. N. Cornsweet (1953). The disappearance of steadily fixated visual test objects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43:495–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rockel, A. J., R. W. Hiorns, and T. P. S. Powell (1974). Numbers of neurons through full depth of neocortex. Proc. Anat. Soc. Gt. Brit. Ire. 118:371.Google Scholar
  34. Ross, J., and J. H. Hogben (1975). The Pulfrich effect and short-term memory in stereopsis. Vision Res. 15:1289–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakitt, B., and H. B. Barlow (1979). An economical model for the cortical encoding of the visual image. In preparation.Google Scholar
  36. Tulunay-Keesey, U. (1960). Effects of involuntary eye movements on visual acuity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50:769–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Westheimer, G., and S. P. McKee (1975). Visual acuity in the presence of retinal image motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65:847–850.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Westheimer, G., and S. P. McKee (1977). Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vision Res. 17:89–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, H. R. (1979). Quantitative characterization of two types of line spread function near the fovea. Vision Res. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. B. Barlow
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiological LaboratoryCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations