Advertisement

Cognitive, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Consequences of Self-Monitoring

  • Mark Snyder
Part of the Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect book series (ASCA, volume 5)

Abstract

As their dialogue unfolds, Sancho reflects on Don Quixote’s view of human nature, “It is a fine comparison... though not so new that I have heard it many times before.” Indeed, we do hear the message of Don Quixote time and again. All the world, we are told, is a stage. Life, so the story goes, is a theatrical performance. In the theater of life, appearances and outward images are often more important than reality itself. Deception, pretense, and affectation may even be made into art forms.

Keywords

Social Interaction Social Situation Strategic Orientation Expressive Behavior Happy Face 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Potomac, Md.: Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. N., and Knight, G. W. Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 1971, 34, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, C. N., Jr., and Sagatun, L. An attributional analysis of experimental norms. Sociometry, 1973, 36, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, D. J., and Allen, A. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berscheid, E., and Graziano, W. The initiation of social relationships and interpersonal attraction. In R. L. Burgess and T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Berscheid, E., Graziano, E., Monson, T., and Dermer, M. Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 978–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brissett, D., and Edgley, C. Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Brunswik, E. Perception and the representative design of experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie, R., and Geis, F. L. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J., and Meehl, P. E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. The approval motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 1969, 32, 88–106.Google Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. Manual for the Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. Festinger, L. Behavioral support for opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1964, 28, 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geizer, R. S., Rarick, D. L., and Soldow, G. F. Deception and judgment accuracy: A study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 446–449.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interactions. Psychiatry, 1955, 18, 213–221.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1959.Google Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1967.Google Scholar
  22. Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ickes, W., and Barnes, R. D. The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ickes, W., Layden, M. A., and Barnes, R. D. Objective self-awareness and individuation: An empirical link. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, E. E., and Baumeister, R. The self-monitor looks at the ingratiator. Journal of Personality, 1976, 44, 654–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelley, H. H. Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, and B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the cause of behavior. New York: General Learning, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., and Olson, C. Modalities and cues in perceiving deception. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
  28. Lippa, R. The effect of expressive control on expressive consistency and on the relation between expressive behavior and personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1976. (a)Google Scholar
  29. Lippa, R. Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extraversion during role-played teaching. Journal of Personality, 1976, 44, 541–559. (b)Google Scholar
  30. Metcalf, J. T. Empathy and the actor’s emotion. Journal of Social Psychology, 1931, 2, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mischel, W. Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.Google Scholar
  32. Moos, R. H. Situational analysis of a therapeutic community milieu. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968, 73, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rarick, D. L., Soldow, G. F., and Geizer, R. S. Self-monitoring as a mediator of conformity. Central States Speech Journal, 1976, 27 (4), 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schachter, S. Some extraordinary facts about obese humans and rats. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schachter, S., and Rodin, J. (Eds.). Obese humans and rats. Washington, D.C.: Erlbaum, 1974.Google Scholar
  36. Snyder, M. Individual differences and the self-control of expressive behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 33, 4533A–4534A (University Microfilms No. 73–4598).Google Scholar
  37. Snyder, M. The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snyder, M. Attribution and behavior: Social perception and social causation. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  39. Snyder, M. Impression management. In L. S. Wrightsman (Ed.), Social psychology in the seventies. Belmont, Cal.: Brooks-Cole, 1977.Google Scholar
  40. Snyder, M., and Monson, T. C. Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snyder, M., and Swann, W. B., Jr. When actions reflect attitudes: The politics of impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1034–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snyder, M., and Tanke, E. D. Behavior and attitude: Some people are more consistent than others. Journal of Personality, 1976, 44, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wicker, A. W. Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Younger, J. C., and Pliner, P. Obese-normal differences in the self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, 10, 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Snyder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations