Advertisement

IBM Versus Quadrupole Phonons

  • Vladimir Paar
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS)

Abstract

The main topic of this Symposium is the SU (6) interacting-boson model (IBM) of Iachello and Arima. Our aim is to stress its relation to the SU (6) truncated quadrupole-phonon model (TQM) of Janssen, Jolos, and Dönau, as well as to the boson-expansion model and to the Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian. The IBM and the TQM are equivalent as far as the phenomenological treatment of the parameters is concerned; among other features, all limiting symmetries (SU(3), SU (5), O(5),...) and the results obtained by fitting the parameters are exactly the same in both models. In fact, the IBM and the TQM are two representations of the SU (6) group (the Schwinger and the Holstein-Primakoff representations, respectively). In addition, advantages and shortcomings of SU(6) models versus boson-expansion methods are pointed out. It is noted that the SU(6) Hamiltonian could be interpreted as a particular realization of the Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian.

Keywords

Matrix Element Collective State Pauli Principle Interact Boson Model Additional Quantum Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.V. Jolos, F. Dönau, and D. Janssen, Construction of Collective Hamiltonian in the Microscopic Model of Nucleus, Teor.Mat.Fys. 20:112 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Janssen, R.V. Jolos, and F. Dönau, An Algebraic Treatment of the Nuclear Quadrupole Degree of Freedom, Nucl.Phys. A224:93 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Magnetization of a Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58:1098 (1940).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Holzwarth, D. Janssen, and R.V. Jolos, On the Validity of the Boson Method for Transitional Nuclei, Nucl.Phys. A261:l (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson Model of Collective States I. The Vibrational Limit, Ann. Phys. 99:253 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Jolos, F. Dönau, and D. Janssen, Construction of Collective Hamiltonian in Microscopic Nuclear Model II, Preprint P4-8077, JINR, Dubna, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson Model of Collective Nuclear States II. The Rotational Limit, Ann.Phys. 111:201 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.V. Jolos, F. Donau, and D. Janssen, Symmetry Properties of Collective States of Deformed Nuclei, Yad.Fiz. 22:965 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Schwinger, On Angular Momentum, in: “The Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum” L.C. Biedenharn and H. Van Dam, eds., Academic Press, New York (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Faessler, E2-Oberflächenresonanzen in sphärischen Kernen, Nucl. Phys. 85:653 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.C. Pang, A. Klein, and R.M. Dreizler, Study of Boson Expansion Methods in an Exactly Soluble Two-Level Shell Model, Ann.Phys. 49:477 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.G. Lie and G. Holzwarth, Application of the Boson-Expansion Method to Even Se and Ru Isotopes, Phys. Rev. C12:1035 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E.R. Marshalek, Perturbative Boson Expansions to All Orders for Even and Odd Nuclei, Nucl.Phys. A224:221 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Paar, Ward-Like Identities, Cluster-Vibration Model and Quasirotational Pattern, in: “Selected Topics in Nuclear Structure” Vol. 2, J. Styczen and R. Kulessa, eds., Institute of Nuclear Physics, Jagellonian University, Krakow (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Paar
    • 1
  1. 1.Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultetUniversity of Zagreb and “Rudjer Bošković” InstituteZagrebYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations