Be10 and U-Series Isotopes in Manganese Nodules from the Central North Pacific

  • T. L. Ku
  • A. Omura
  • P. S. Chen
Part of the Marine Science book series (MR, volume 9)


The exponential decreases with depth of Be10, Th230 and Pa231 in two manganese nodules from the central North Pacific is interpreted in terms of slow growth of the nodules: at average rates of millimeters per million years. We observe in one specimen (Mn 139): Be10-based rate < Th230-based rate < Pa231-based rate. This suggests that diffusion-mixing may have modified the depth gradients of these nuclides, such that the true rate would be close to or even lower than the observed Be10 rate of 1.3 mm/106yr. Quantitative assessment using a diffusion-decay model indicates that in Mn 139, Th230 and Pa231 could have been subjected to diffusion-like transport with an effective diffusion coefficient of ∿ 1x10−8cm2/yr. After correction for this effect, the Th230 and Pa231 data give a concordant rate of 1.9 mm/106yr, about 2–3 times lower than their uncorrected values. The small and variable amounts of integrated dpm/cm2 of Be10, Th ex 230 and Pa ex 231 found in nodules are best explained by their incorporating only a fraction of the nuclides supplied due to frequent coverage by sediments. The alternative explanation of young “exposure” ages is refutable on several grounds. Among these, we show that diffusion of nuclides required by the exposure-age concept yields depth profiles that are not of the commonly observed exponential form.


Effective Diffusion Coefficient Manganese Nodule Ferromanganese Nodule Unit Area Basis Nodule Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amin, B. S., Lai, D. and Somayajulu, B. L. K. (1975) Chronology of marine sediments using the Be10 method: intercomparison with other methods. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 39, 1187–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrhenius, G. (1967) Deep-sea sedimentation: a critical review of U.S. work. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 48, 604–631.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, M. L., Ku, T. L. and Broecker, W. S. (1966) Manganese nodules: Their evolution. Science 151, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat, S. G., Krishnaswami, S., Lai, D., Rama and Somayajulu, B. L. K. (1973) Radiometric and trace elemental studies of ferromanganese nodules. Proc. Symp. Hydrogeochem. Biogeochem., I, 443–462, Clarke, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C. (1959) Conduction of Heat in Solids (2nd edition) Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Duursma, E. K., and Hodge, C. (1967) Theoretical, experimental and field studies concerning molecular diffusion of radioisotopes in sediments and suspended solid particles of the sea, Part A: theoretical and mathematical calculation. Netherland Jour. Sea Res. 3, 423–457.Google Scholar
  7. Guichard, F., Reyss, J. L. and Yokoyama, Y. (1978) Growth rates of manganese nodules measured with 10Be and 26A1. Nature 272, 155–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krishnaswami, S. and Cochran, J. K. (1978) Uranium and thorium series nuclides in oriented ferromanganese nodules: growth rates, turnover times and nuclide behavior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 40, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krishnaswami, S., Somayajulu, B. L. K. and Moore, W. S. (1972) Dating of manganese nodules using beryllium-10. In Papers from a Conference on Ferromanganese Deposits on the Ocean Floor (ed. D. R. Horn ) 117–122. NSF, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Ku, T. L. (1972) Radium in the ocean. In Encyclopedia of Geochemistry and Environmental Sciences (ed. R. W. Fairbridge ), 1008–1014, Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y.Google Scholar
  11. Ku, T. L. (1977) Rates of accretion. In Marine Manganese Deposits (ed. G. P. Glasby ) 249–267, Elsevier, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ku, T. L. and Broecker, W. S. (1969) Radiochemical studies on manganese nodules of deep-sea origin. Deep-Sea Res. 16, 625–637.Google Scholar
  13. Ku, T. L. and Knauss, K. G. (1978) Radiocative disequilibrium in fissure-filling material and its implication in dating of manganese nodules. Collogue International du C.N.R.S. No. 289 sur la Genèse des Nodules de Manganèse, Gif-sur-Yvette, 25–30 September.Google Scholar
  14. Ku, T. L., Knauss, K. G. and Lin, M. C. (1975) An evaluation of dating nodules by the uranium series isotopes. ESS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 56, 999.Google Scholar
  15. Lai, D. and Schink, D. R. (1960) Low background thin-wall flow counters for measuring the beta activity of solids. Rev. Sci. Instr. 31, 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lalou, C. and Brichet, E. (1972) Signification des mesures radio-chimiques dans l’évaluation de la vitesse de croissance des nodules de manganèse. C. R. Acad. Se. Paris. Série D, 275, 815–818.Google Scholar
  17. Lalou, C., Ku, T. L., Brichet, E., Poupeau, G. and Romary, P. (1978) TECHNO encrustation I: radiometric studies. Collogue International du C.N.R.S. No. 289 sur Genèse des Nodules de Manganèse, Gif-sur-Yvette, 25–30 September.Google Scholar
  18. Li, Y. H. and Gregory, S. (1974) Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38, 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolberg, J. R. (1967) Prediction Analysis. Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. L. Ku
    • 1
  • A. Omura
    • 1
  • P. S. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations