Advertisement

Linguistic Meaning-Related Differences in ERP Scalp Topography

  • Warren S. Brown
  • Dietrich Lehmann
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 9)

Abstract

Certain aspects of language have been hypothesized to be processed in different cortical areas or, at least, by different neural elements. The most obvious example is the classical differentiation of the speech disorders associated with frontal or temporal-parietal lesions of the dominant hemisphere, i.e. expressive versus receptive language disorders. More specific disturbances have been reported which showed impairment of word finding predominantly concerning nouns in some patients and verbs in other patients (Kleist, 1934; Brown, 1972). Nouns and grammatical words have been reported to be differentially affected by anterior and posterior lesions in patients with anomia (Brown, 1972).

Keywords

Stimulus Word Test Sentence Linguistic Meaning Scalp Topography Connotative Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, J. W. Aphasia, Apraxia and Agnosia. Springfield, I11.: Thomas, 1972, 26–29.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, W. S., Marsh, J. T. and Smith, J. C. Contextual meaning effects on speech evoked potentials. Behav. Biol., 1973, 9, 755–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, W. S., Marsh, J. T. and Smith, J. C. Evoked potential waveform differences produced by the perception of different meanings of ambiguous phrases. Electroenceph. Clin. Neuro- physiol., 1976, 41, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, W. S., Marsh, J. T. and Smith, J. C. Principal component analysis of ERP differences related to the meaning of an ambiguous word. In prep.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, R., Bragdon, H., Chapman, J. and McCrary, J. Semantic meaning of words and average evoked potentials. In, J. Desmedt (Ed.) Language and Hemispheric Specialization in Man: Cerebral Event Related Potentials, Basel: S. Karger, 1977, 36–47.Google Scholar
  6. Grinberg and John, E. R. Unpublished work described in R. W. Thatcher and E. R. John. Functional Neuroscience: Vol. I Foundations of Cognitive Processes, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Assoc., 1977, p. 261.Google Scholar
  7. Herrington, R. N. and Schneidau, P. The effects of imagery on the visual evoked response. Experientia, 1968, 24, 1136–1137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. John, E.R., Herrington, P.N. and Sutton, S Effects of visual form on the evoked response. Science, 1967, 155, 1439–1442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnston, V. and Chesney, G. Electrophysiological correlates of meaning. Science, 1974, 186, 944–946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleist, K. Gehirnpathologie, Leipzig: Barth, 1934, 801.Google Scholar
  11. Lehmann, D. The EEG as scalp field distribution. In, A. Remond (Ed.), EEG Informatics: A Didactic Review of Methods and Applications of EEG, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977, 365–384.Google Scholar
  12. Lehmann, D. Multichannel topography of human alpha EEG fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1971, 31, 439–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehmann, D., Meies, H. P. and Mir, E. Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemiretina: Latency differences. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1977, 43,725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lehmann, D., Koukkou, M. and Dittrich, A. Pattern evoked average EEG potentials and dichoptic visual percepts. Perception, 1977, 6, 77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsh, J. T. and Brown, W. S. Evoked potential correlates of meaning in the perception of language. In, J. Desmedt (Ed.) Language and Hemispheric Specialization in Man: Cerebral Event Related Potentials, Basel: Karger, 1977, 60–72.Google Scholar
  16. Ragot, R., Cecchini, A. and Remond, A. Les possibilities de la saisie topographique et du traitment cartographique des signaux EEG. Rev. EEG Neurophysiol., 1976, 6, 278–284.Google Scholar
  17. Remond, A. The importance of topographic data in EEG phenomena, and an electrical model to reproduce them. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, Suppl. 27, 29–49.Google Scholar
  18. Teyler, T., Harrison, T., Roemer, R. and Thompson, R. Human scalp recorded evoked potential correlates of linguistic stimuli. Psychonom. Soc. Bull., 1973, 1, 333–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren S. Brown
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dietrich Lehmann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity HospitalZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations