A Trial by Trial Study of the Visual Omission Response in Reaction Time Situations

  • B. Renault
  • N. Lesevre
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 9)


The present work was undertaken in order to study the mechanisms underlying the various stages of perceptive and perceptivo-motor processes by analyzing the characteristics (latency, amplitude and topographical distribution) of its electrophysiological correlates.


Negative Component Readiness Potential Positive Wave Negative Wave Selection Response Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S.A. and Galambos, R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975,39 131–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. Augmenting mental chro- nometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 1977, 197, 792–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kutas, M. and Donchin, E. The effect of handedness, of responding hand and of response force on the contralateral dominance of the readiness potential. In J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, I, Basel: Karger, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Remond, A. Integrated and topographical analysis of the EEG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1961, Sup.20M 64–67.Google Scholar
  5. Renault, B. and Lesevre, N. Topographical study of the emitted potential obtained after the omission of an expected visual stimulus. In D.A. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event Related Brain Potential Research, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Renault, B., Ragot, R., Furet, J. and Lesevre, N. Etude desrelations entre le potentiel emis et les mecanismes de preparation perceptivo-motrice. In J. Requin (Ed.), Anticipation et Processus Psychologiques, CNRS, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Roth, W.T., Ford, J.M. and Kopell, B.S. Long latency evoked potentials and reaction time. Psychophysiol., 1978, 17–23.Google Scholar
  8. Ruchkin, B.S. and Sutton, S. Latency characteristics and trial by trial variation of emitted potentials. In J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Cognitive Components in Event Related Cerebral Potentials, Basel: Karger, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Simson, R., Vaughan, H.G. and Ritter W. The scalp topography ofGoogle Scholar
  10. potentials associated with missing visual and auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1976, 40, 33–42.Google Scholar
  11. Squires, N.K. Squires, K.C. and Hillyard, S.A. Two varieties of long latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimulus. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 38, 387–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Squires, K.C., Donchin, E., Herning, R.I. and McCarthy, G. On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event related potential components. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1977,42 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Renault
    • 1
  • N. Lesevre
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrophysiology and Applied Neurophysiology LaboratoryHopital de La SalpetriereParis Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations