Event Related Scalp Potentials during a Bimanual Choice R.T. Task: Topography and Interhemispheric Relations

  • R. Ragot
  • A. Remond
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 9)


The general purpose of this experimgnt is to evaluate the specificity of electrophysiological correlates of decision making in the brain; in particular, its main goal is to investigate possible relationships between right and left hemijsphere scalp recorded electrical activity during a choice reaction time task and either the stimulated or the responding side of the body.


P300 Latency Contingent Negative Variation Motor Potential Left Index Finger Choice Reaction Time Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cooper, R., McCallum, W.C., Newton, P., Papakostopoulos, D., Pocock, P.V. and Warren, W.J. Cortical potential associated with the detection of visual events. Science, 1977, 196, 74–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S.A. and Galambos, R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39, 131–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craft, J.L. and Simon, J.R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J, Exp. Psychol., 1970, 83, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deecke, L., Scheid, P. and Kornhuber, H.H. Distribution of readiness potential, premotion positivity and motor potential of the human cerebral cortex preceding voluntary finger movements. Exp. Brain Res., 1969, 7, 158–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demaire, C. and Coquery, J.M. Effects of selective attention on the late components of evoked potentials in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1977, 42, 702–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerbrandt, L.K., Goff, W.R. and Smith D.B.D. Distribution of the human average movement potential. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1973, 34, 461–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilden, L., Vaughan, H.G. and Costa, L.D. Summated human electroencephalographic potentials associated with voluntary movements. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1966, 20, 433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klinke, R., Fruhstorfer, H. and Finkenzeller, R. Evoked responses as a function of external and stored information. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 29, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kornhuber, H.H. and Deecke, L. Hirnpotentialanderungen bei Willkurbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaf tpotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflugers Arch. Ges. Physiol., 1965, 284, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kutas, M. and Donchin, E. The effects of handedness, or responding hand and of response force on the contralateral dominance of the readiness potential. In J. Desmedt (Ed.), Attention, Voluntary Contraction and Event Related Cerebral Potentials, Karger: Basel, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Remond, A. Integrated and topographical analysis of the EEG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl. 20, Computer techniques in EEG analysis., 1961b, 64–67.Google Scholar
  12. Renault, B. and Lesevre, N. Topographical study of the emitted potential obtained after the omission of an expected visual stimulus. In D.A. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event Related Brain Potential Research, U.S. Government Printing Office, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Renault, B., Ragot, R., Furet, J. and Lesevre, N. Etude des relations entre le potentiel emis et les mecanismes de preparation perceptivo-motrice. In J. Requin (Ed.), Anticipation et Processus Psychologiques, CNRS, in press.Google Scholar
  14. Simon, J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation., J, Exp. Psychol., 1969, 81, 174–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simson, R., Vaughan, H.G. and Ritter, W. The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1976, 40, 33–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Squires, K.C., Donchin, E., Herning, R.I. and McCarthy, G. The influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event related potential components. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1977, 42, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutton, S., Braren, M. and Zubin, J. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 1965, 155, 1187–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J. and John, E.R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science, 1967, 155, 1436–1439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Syndulko, K. and Lindsley, D.B. Motor and sensory determinants of cortical slow potential shifts in man. in J. Desmedt (Ed.), Attention, Voluntary Contraction and Event Related Cerebral Potentials, Karger: Basel, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Van Voorhis, S. and Hillyard, S.A. Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space. Perception and Psycho—physics, 1977, 22, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vaughan, H.G., Costa, L.D. and Ritter, W. Topography of the human motor potential. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 25, 1–10.. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weinberg, H., Walter, H.G. and Crow, H.J. Intracerebral events in humans related to real and imaginery stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1970, 29, 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zazzo, R. Manuel pour l’examen psychologique de l’;enfant. Dela-chaux et Niestle, 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Ragot
    • 1
  • A. Remond
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrophysiology and Applied Neurophysiology LaboratorySalpetriere HospitalParis Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations