Advertisement

Event Related Potentials in Language and Non-Language Tasks in Patients with Alexia without Agraphia

  • H. J. Neville
  • E. Snyder
  • R. Knight
  • R. Galambos
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 9)

Abstract

The concurrent study of behavior and event related potentials (ERPs) from different scalp locations can provide converging evidence for the brain structures and functions which underlie normal human cognitive processes. The study of behavior and ERPs in patients with localized brain damage that has resulted in specific behavioral deficits can, in theory, complement studies of normal subjects by: (1) describing changes in particular aspects of ERPs associated with disturbances in particular cognitive functions, and (2) permitting correlations between the absence or distortion of particular ERP components and damage to particular areas of the brain. Results from studies like these may provide information as to those aspects of cognitive functions that are reflected in particular ERP components and may also provide information as to the neural origins of different ERP components.

Keywords

Visual Field Line Drawing Occipital Cortex Left Visual Field Letter Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajax, E.T., Schenkenberg, T. and Kosteljanetz, M. Alexia without agraphia and the inferior splenium. Neurol., 1977, 27, 685–688.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, W.S., Marsh, J.T. and Smith, J.C. Evoked potential waveform differences produced by the perception of different meanings of an ambiguous phrase. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1976, 41, 113–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dejerine, M.J. Contribution a 1’etude anatomopathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale. Societe de BiologieComptes rendus et memoire, 1892, 4, 61–90.Google Scholar
  4. Donchin, E., McCarthy, G. and Kutas, M. Electroencephalographic investigations of hemispheric specialization. In J.E. Desmedt (Ed.) Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology. Language and Hemispheric Specialization in Man: Event Related Potentials. Basel: Karger, 1977, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W. and Rapin, I. Cortical evoked potentials elicited by real speech words and human sounds. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 38, 13–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galambos, R., Benson, P., Smith, T.S., Schulman-Galambos, C. and Osier, H. On hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to speech stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39, 279–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geshwind, N. Disconnection syndromes in animals and man. Brain, 1965, 88, 237–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hillyard, S.A. and Picton, T.W. Event related brain potentials and selective information processing in man. In J. Desmedt (Ed.) Cerebral Evoked Potentials in Man, Basel: Karger, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Kimura, D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 1967, 3, 163–178.Google Scholar
  10. Klein, D., Moscovitch, M. and Vigna, R. Attentional mechanisms and asymmetries in tachistoscopic recognition of words and faces. Neuropsychologia, 1976, 14, 55–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knox, C. and Kimura, D. Cerebral processing of nonverbal sounds in boys and girls. Neuropsychologia, 1968, 6, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luria, A.R. and Karasseva, T.A. Disturbances of auditory-speech memory in focal lesions of the deep regions of the left lobe. Neurosychologia, 1968, 6, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakamura, Z. and Siersdorf, W.R. Localization of the human visual evoked response: Early components specific to visual stimulation. Amer. J. Ophthal. 1971, 72, 988–997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neville, H.J., Schulman, C. and Galambos, R. Evoked potential and behavioral correlates of functional hemispheric specialization. Presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychology Society, Sante Fe, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. Shagass, C., Amadeo, M. and Roemer, R.A. Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half field pattern reversal and pattern onset stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1976,41, 609–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J. and John, E.R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science, 1967, 155, 1436–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Teuber, H.-L. Why two brains? In F.O. Schmitt and F.G. Worden (Eds.) The Neurosciences Third Study Program. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  18. Vincent, F.M., Sadowsky, C.H., Saunders, R.L. and Reeves, A.G. Alexia without agraphia, hemianopia or color naming defect: A disconnection syndrome. Neurol., 1977, 27, 689–691.Google Scholar
  19. Wernicke, C. Die neuren arbeiten über aphasie. Fortschritt der Medecin, 1885.Google Scholar
  20. Wildberger, H.G.H., Van Lith, G.H.M., Wijngaarde, R. and Mak, G.T.M. Visually evoked cortical potentials in the evaluation of homonymous and bitemporal visual field defects. Brit. J. Ophthal., 1976, 60, 273–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wood., G, Goff, W.R. and Day, R.S. Auditory evoked potentials during speech perception. Science, 1971, 173, 1248–1251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Neville
    • 1
  • E. Snyder
    • 1
  • R. Knight
    • 1
  • R. Galambos
    • 1
  1. 1.The Salk Institute and University of CaliforniaSan DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations