Advertisement

LH Receptors in the Ovine Corpus Luteum During the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy

  • G. D. Niswender
  • M. A. Diekman
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 112)

Abstract

Luteinizing hormone (LH) appears to be the endocrine factor responsible for the stimulation of progesterone secretion in ovine luteal tissue (1,2,3). The action of LH is mediated, presumably, via binding to a hormone-specific membrane associated receptor (4) and a subsequent increase in synthesis of cAMP and steroidogenesis (5). However, the precise details of the mechanisms whereby LH regulates progesterone secretion are not known. Current concepts suggest that the primary factor regulating the quantity of progesterone secreted from the corpus luteum is the number of luteal receptors for LH which are occupied by this gonadotropic hormone. In sheep, serum concentrations of LH are at their lowest levels during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle when progesterone secretion is maximal (6,7). Therefore, the total number of luteal receptors for LH or the affinity of the receptor for LH must increase during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle if the number of LH receptors occupied by endogenous hormone is to increase. Similarly, since progesterone secretion remains high during early pregnancy, even though serum levels of LH remain low, it seems likely that the total number of receptors occupied by LH will remain high during this reproductive state.

Keywords

Luteinizing Hormone Corpus Luteum Estrous Cycle Luteal Cell Luteinizing Hormone Receptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    C.C. Kaltenbach, B. Cook, G.D. Niswender and A.V. Nalbandov. Endocrinology 82 (1967) 1407.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    G.D. Niswender, T.J. Reimers, M.A. Diekman and T.M. Nett. Biol. Reprod. 14(1976)64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    K.R. Simmons, J.L. Caffrey, J.L. Phillips, J.H. Abel, Jr. and G.D. Niswender. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 152(1976)366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    R.J. Ryan and C.Y. Lee. Biol. Reprod. 14(1976)16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    A.W. Jordan, III, J.L. Caffrey and G.D. Niswender. Endocrinology 14(1976)16. (in press).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    G.D. Niswender, J.F. Roche, D.L. Foster and A.R. Midgley, Jr. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 129(1968)901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    G.D. Niswender. Endocrinology 94(1974)612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    G.D. Niswender. Steroids 22(1973)413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    M.A. Diekman, P. O’Callaghan, T.M. Nett and G.D. Niswender. Biol. Reprod. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    R.G.D. Steel and J.H. Torrie. Principles and Procedures of Statistics ( McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    C. Mendelson, M. Dufau and K. Catt, J. Biol. Chem. 250 (1975) 8818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    M.C. McClellan, M.A. Diekman, J.H. Abel, Jr. and G.D. Niswender. Cell Tiss. Res. 164(1975)291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. D. Niswender
    • 1
  • M. A. Diekman
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Physiology & BiophysicsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations