Evoked Potentials in Patients with Neurological Disorders

  • Roger Q. Cracco
Part of the The Downstate Series of Research in Psychiatry and Psychology book series (DSRPP, volume 2)


Averaged evoked potentials have been investigated in the research laboratory for many years but it is only in the last few years that the clinical applications of these methods have received emphasis. In the preceding three chapters of this volume clinically oriented research is presented. These investigations and other related material are discussed in the first part of this chapter. The second part consists of a brief review of the applications of evoked potential methods in the clinical evaluation of patients with neurological disorders.


Multiple Sclerosis Frontal Lobe Optic Neuritis Evoke Potential Acoustic Neuroma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Begleiter, H. and Porjesz, B. Persistance of brain hyperexcitability following chronic alcohol exposure in rats. Advances in Exptl. Medicine and Biology, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. Begleiter, H., DeNoble, V. and Porjesz, B. The effects of alcohol on cortical and subcortical evoked potentials in the monkey. Psychopharmacology, 1978 (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Himwich, H.E. and Callison, D.A. The effects of alcohol on evoked potentials of various parts of the central nervous system of the cat. The Biology of alcoholism, 2:67–84 (Plenum Press) 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewis, E.G., Dustman, R.E. and Beck, E.C. The effects of alcohol on visual and somatosensory evoked responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 28: 202–205, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Porjesz, B. and Begleiter, H. Alcohol and bilateral evoked poten tials. In: Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 59, M.M. Gross (Ed), Plenum Press, N.Y., 553–567, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Porjesz, B., Begleiter, H. and Hurowitz, S. Brain excitability subsequent to alcohol withdrawal in rats. In: Tissue responses to addictive drugs. D.H. Ford and D.H. Clonet (Ed), Spectrum, N.Y., 461–469, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Alajouanine, T.; Scherrer, J.; Barbizet, J. ; Calvet, J. and Verley, R.: Potentiels evoques corticaux chez des subjets atteints de troubles somesthetiques. Rev. Neurol., 98: 757–761, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Allen, A., and Starr, A. Sensory evoked potentials in the operating room. Neurology, 27: 358, 1977,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Allison, T., Goff, W.R., Williamson, P.D. and Van Gilder, J.C. On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential. Proc. Int. Symp. Cerebral Evoked Potentials in Man, Belgium, 1974(In press),Google Scholar
  10. Asselman, P., Chadwick, D,W. and Marsden, C.D. Visual evoked res ponses in the diagnoses and management of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain, 98: 261–282, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergamini, L.; Bergamasco, B. Fra, I.; Gandiglio, G.; Mombelli, A.M. and Mutani, R.: Somatosensory evoked cortical potentials in subjects with peripheral nervous lesions. Electromyography, 5: 121–130, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bodis-Wollner, I. Recovery from cerebral blindness: evoked potential and psychophysical measurements. Electroenceph. clin. Neuro-physiol., 42: 178–184, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broughton, R.; Meier-Ewert, K. and Ebe, M.: Evoked visual, somatosensory and retinal potentials in photosensitive epilepsy. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 27: 373–386, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchwald, J.S. and Huang, C.M. Far Field acoustic responses: origins in the cat. Science, 189: 382–384, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Celesia, C.G. and Daly, R.F. Visual electroencephalographic computer analysis: a new electrophysiological test for the diagnosis of optic nerve lesions. Neurology, 1977 (in press).Google Scholar
  16. Calmes, R.L. and Cracco, R.Q. Comparison of somatosensory and somatomotor evoked responses to median nerve and digital nerve stimulation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.,31: 547–562, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cracco, R.Q. The initial positive potential of the scalp recorded somatosensory evoked response. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 32: 623–629, 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Cracco, R.Q. Spinal evoked response: peripheral nerve stimulation in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 35: 379–386, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. Cracco, J.B., Cracco, R.Q. and Graziani, L.J. The spinal evoked response in infants with myelodysplasia, Neurology, 4: 359–360, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. Cracco,J.B., Cracco, R.Q., and Graziani, L.J. The spinal evoked response in infants and children. Neurology, 25: 31–36. 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cracco, R.Q. and Cracco, J.B. Somatosensory evoked potential in man: far field potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol, 41: 460–466, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dawson, G.D.: Investigations on a patient subject to myoclonic seizures after sensory stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 10: 141–162, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feinsod, M. Abramsky, O. and Auerbach, E. Electrophysiological examination of the visual system in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sc., 20: 161–175, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feinsod, M. and Hoyt, W. Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 38(2): 1109–1114, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feinsod, M., Seihorst, J.B., Hoyt, W.F. and Wilson, C.B. Monitor ing optic nerve function during craniotomy. J. Neurosurg., 44:29–31, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giblin, D.R.: Somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy subjects and in patients with lesions of the nervous system. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 93–142, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, R.P., Becker, D.P., Miller, J.D. and Mayer, D.J. Evaluation of brain function in severe head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. J. Neurosurg.,(in press) 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Halliday, A.M. The incidence of large cerebral evoked responses in myoclonic epilepsy, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 19: 102, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. Halliday, A.M. and Halliday, E.: Cortical evoked potentials in patients with benign essential myoclonus and progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 29: 106, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. Halliday, A.M. and Wakefield, G.S.: Cerebral evoked potentials in patients with dissociated sensory loss. J. Neurol. Neurosurg., Psychiat. 26: 211–219, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halliday, A.M., Halliday, E., Kriss, A., McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain, 99(2): 357–374, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halliday, A.M. McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet, 1:982–985, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halliday, A.M., McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. Delayed patternevoked responses in optic neuritis in relation to visual acuity. Trans. Opthalmol. Soc. VK., 93: 315–324, 1973a.Google Scholar
  34. Halliday, A.M. McDonald, W.I. and Mushin, J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br. Med. J. 4:661–664, 1973b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harter, M.R. and White, C.T. Effects of contour sharpness and check size on visually evoked cortical potentials. Vision Res. 8:701–711, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jewett, D.L., Romano, M.N. and Williston, J.S. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science, 167: 1517–1518, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kazaki, A.; Shiota, K. ; Terada,C.; Utsumi, S. and Hori, P.: Clinical studies on the somatosensory evoked response in neurosurgical patients. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 31: 184–191, 1971.Google Scholar
  38. Läget, P.; Mamo, H. et Houdart, R.,4:De l’interet des potentials evoques somesthesiques dans l’etude des lesions due lobe parietal de l’homme. Etude preliminaire. Neuro-chirurgie. 13:841–853, 1967.Google Scholar
  39. Liberson, W.T.: Study of evoked potentials in aphasics. Amer.J. Phys. Med. 45: 135–142, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Namerow, N. and Enns, N. Visual evoked responses in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 35: 829–833, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perot, P.L., Jr. The clinical use of somatosensory evoked poten tials in spinal cord injury, Clin. Neurosurg. pp. 367–382, 1973.Google Scholar
  42. Regan, D., Milner, B. and Heron, J.R. Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis. Brain, 99(1): 43–66. 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Regan, D. and Spekreijse, H. Evoked potential indications of color blindness. Vision Res., 14: 89–95, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richey, E.T., Kooi, K.A. and Tourtellotte, W.W. Visually evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 34: 275–280, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson, K. and Rudge, P. Auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Lancet, 1:1164-1166, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sohmer, H., Feinmesser, M. and Szabo, G. Sources of electrocochleographic responses as studied in patients with brain damage. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 37:663–669, 1974.Google Scholar
  47. Sohmer, H. and Pratt, H. Recording of cochlear microphonic potential with surface electrodes. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 40: 253–260, 1976.Google Scholar
  48. Starr, A. Auditory brain stem responses in brain death. Brain, 99: 543–554, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Starr, A. and Hamilton, A.E. Correlation between confirmed site of neurological lesions and abnormalities of far field auditory brain stem responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 4:595–608, 1976.Google Scholar
  50. Starr, A. and Achor, L.J. Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. Arch. Neurol., 32:761–768, 1975.Google Scholar
  51. Stockard, J.J. and Rossiter, V.S. Clinical and pathological correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities. Neurology, 24:316–325, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thornton, A.R.D. and Hawkes, C.H. Neurological applications of surface recorded electrocochleography. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 39: 586–592, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaughan, H., Jr. and Katzman, R. Evoked responses in visual dis orders. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 112:305–319, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vaughan, H., Jr., Katzman, R. and Taylor, J. Alterations of visual evoked response in the presence of homonymous visual defects. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 15:737–746, 1963.Google Scholar
  55. Wiederholt, W.G. and Iraqui-Madoz, V.J. Far-field somatosensory potentials in the rat. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 42: 456–465, 1977.Google Scholar
  56. Williamson, P.D., Goff, W.R. and Allison, T.: Somatosensory evoked responses in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 28: 566–576, 1970.Google Scholar
  57. Wright, J.E., Arden, G. and Jones, B.R. Continuous monitoring of the visually evoked response during intra-orbital surgery. Trans. Opthalmolol. Soc. VK, 93: 311–4. 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Q. Cracco
    • 1
  1. 1.Downstate Medical CenterS.U.N.Y.BrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations