The Cancer Patient as Educator and Counselor

  • Barbara G. Cox
Part of the Sloan-Kettering Institute Cancer Series book series (SKICS)


Traditionally, the cancer patient has been a passive recipient of various therapies—exerting very little personal direction over either the management or the outcome of his or her disease. Unlike patients with diabetes or hypertension, (1) for example, cancer patients generally adopt a passive role in their treatment, aside from the actual consent to therapy or refusal thereof. The cancer patient literally presents his or her body to the clinic or hospital, where it is examined by a variety of specialists, subjected to surgery, irradiated, and/or treated with toxic chemotherapeutic agents. Through all of this, the patient often feels like an object, while the family stands by, feeling uninformed and helpless, unable to assist the patient through the various discomforts and fears he or she faces.


Lung Cancer American Cancer Society Patient Participation Ileal Pouch Assessment Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lazes, P. M. Health education project guides outpatients to active self-care. Hospitals, J.A.H.A.51:81–86, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, V. L., Reiter, H., Lentz, G. A., Jr., and Whaples, G. C. An approach to consumer-patient activation in health maintenance. Public Health Reports 90: 449–454, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janik, N. The shortest distance between treatment and survival: Reach to recovery. Proceedings of The American Cancer Society Second National Conference on Human Values & Cancer, Chicago, 1977, pp. 180–182.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    1977 Cancer Facts & Figures. New York: American Cancer Society, 1976, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yahle, M. E. An ostomy information clinic. Nurs. Clin. North Am. 11:457–467, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, O. E. Make Today Count. In: National Cancer Institute Response Book, Bethesda, National Cancer Institute, 1978, paragraph 9.12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monaco, M. The Candlelighters: Parents Dedicated to the Conquest of Cancer. Washington D.C.: Candlelighters, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levin, L. S. Patient education and self-care: How do they differ? Nurs. Outlook 26:170–175, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox, B. G. The fine art of educating the patient. Med. Opinion 4:31–35, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cox, B. G., Carr, D. T., and Lee, R. E. Living with Lung Cancer: A Reference Book for People with Lung Cancer and Their Families. Rochester, Minn.: Mayo Foundation, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roth, B. G. Health information for patients: The hospital library’s role. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 66:14–17, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox, B. G., and Wentworth, A. A. The Ileal Pouch Procedure: A New Outlook for the Person with an Ileostomy. Rochester, Minn.: Mayo Foundation, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cox, B. G., and Wentworth, A. A. An evaluation model for the development of patient education literature. Biosciences Communications 2:333–341, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara G. Cox
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical PublicationsRoss LaboratoriesColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations