Advertisement

Only Children, Stereotypes, and Research

  • Toni Falbo
Part of the Genesis of Behavior book series (GOBE, volume 2)

Abstract

Only children are people who grow up without siblings. About 13% of completed American families contain an only child (U.S. Bureau of Census, 1970). Besides being rare, only children are widely considered to be undesirable. In 1950 and again in 1972, Blake (1974) conducted a survey of a representative sample of the American public to determine whether being an only child was considered to be an advantage or disadvantage. Seventy-six percent in 1950 and 80% in 1972 chose “disadvantage” in describing only children.

Keywords

Birth Order American Psychological Association Interpersonal Behavior Experimental Social Psychology Father Absence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, V. L. Children as teachers. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Beckman, L. J. Values of parenthood among women who desire an only child. In J. D.Google Scholar
  3. Goodchilds (Chair), The Only Child: Problems and Prospects. Symposium presented at the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Belmont, L. Birth order, intellectual competence and psychiatric status. Journal of IndividualPsychology, 1977a, 33(1), 97–104.Google Scholar
  5. Belmont, L. Personal communication, October 18, 1977b.Google Scholar
  6. Belmont, L., & Marolla, F. A. Birth order, family size, and intelligence. Science, 1973, 182, 1096–1101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belmont, L., Wittes, J., & Stein, Z. A. The only child syndrome: Myth or reality. PaperGoogle Scholar
  8. presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Life History Research in Psychopathology, Fort Worth, Texas, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Bern, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 1974, 42(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, P. K., & Ivancevich, J. M. Birth order and managerial achievement. Academy ofManagement Journal, 1973, 26(3), 515–519.Google Scholar
  11. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances inexperimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Bieber, I., Dain, H. I., Dince, P. R., Drellich, M. G., Grand, H. G., Gundlach, R. H., Kreiner, M. W., Rifkin, A. H., Wilberg, C. B., & Bieber, T. B. Homosexuality: Apsychoanalytic study. New York: Basic Books, 1962.Google Scholar
  13. Bigner, J. J. Siblings influence on sex-role preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1972, 222(2), 271–282.Google Scholar
  14. Blake, J. Can we believe recent data on birth expectations in the United States? Demography, 1974, 11, 25–44.Google Scholar
  15. Blatz, W. E., & Bott, E. A. Studies in mental hygiene of children: I. Behavior of public school children—a description of method. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1927, 34, 552–582.Google Scholar
  16. Breland, H. M. Birth order, family configuration, and verbal achievement. Child Development, 1974, 45, 1011–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brim, O. G. Family structure and sex role learning by children: A further analysis of Helen Koch’s data. Sociometry, 1958, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burke, M. O. A search for systematic personality differentiate of the only child in young adulthood. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1969, 60, 41–45.Google Scholar
  19. Chapman, K. J., & Chapman, J. P. Genesis of popular but erroneous psycho-diagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, 72(3), 193–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Claudy, J. G. Family size and life outcomes for young adults. In J. D. Goodchilds (Chair), The Only Child: Problems and Prospects. Symposium presented at the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., 1976.Google Scholar
  21. Connors, C. K. Birth order and need for affiliation. Journal of Personality, 1963, 32(3), 409–416.Google Scholar
  22. Corfield, V. K. The utilization of guidance clinic facilities in Alberta, 1961. AlbertaPsychologist, 1968, 9(3), 15–45.Google Scholar
  23. Dyer, D. T. Are only children different? Journal of Educational Psychology, 1945,36, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Falbo, T. Folklore and the only child: A reassessment. In J. D. Goodchilds (Chair), The Only Child: Problems and Prospects. Symposium presented at the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., 1976.Google Scholar
  25. Falbo, T. The only child: A review. Journal of Individual Psychology, 1977, 33(1), 47–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Falbo, T. Only children and interpersonal behavior: An experimental and survey study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978a, 8 (3), 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falbo, T. Sibling tutoring and other explanations for intelligence discontinuities of only and last borns. Population: Behavioral Social and Environmental Issues, 1978b, 1 (4), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farley, F. H., Smart, K. L., & Brittain, C. V. Birth order, rank, and branch of service m the military. Journal of Individual Psychology, 1974, 30(2), 227–232.Google Scholar
  29. Grotevant, H. D., Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. Intellectual development in family constellations with adopted and natural children: A test of the Zajonc and Markus model. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1699–1703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guilford, R. B., & Worcester, D. A. A comparative study of the only and nononly children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1930, 38, 411–126.Google Scholar
  31. Gundlach, R. H., & Riess, B. F. Birth order and sex of siblings in a sample of lesbians and nonlesbians. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 61–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamilton, D. L. Illusory correlation as a basis for social stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore (Chair), Cognitive Biases in Stereotyping. Symposium presented at the 85th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,22,392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastorf, A. H., Schneider, D. J., & Polefkka, J. Person perception, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. Heilbrun, A. E., & Fromme, D. K. Parental identification of late adolescent and level of adjustment: The importance of parental model attributes, ordinal position, and sex of child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1965, 207, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hetherington, E. M. The effects of familial variables on sex typing on parent-child similarity, and on limitation in children. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, 1967, 1, 82–107.Google Scholar
  37. Hooker, H. F. The study of the only child at school. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1931, 39, 122–126.Google Scholar
  38. Hough, E. Some factors in the etiology of maternal over-protection. Smith College Studiesof Social Work, 1932, 2, 188–208.Google Scholar
  39. Howe, M. G., & Madgett, M. E. Mental health problems associated with the only child. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 1975, 20(3), 189–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 1973, 80(4), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving thecauses of behavior, Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  42. Ko, U., & Sun, L. Ordinal position and the behaviour of visiting the child guidance clinic. Acta Psychologia Tiawanica, 1965, 7, 1062–1965.Google Scholar
  43. Kurth, E., & Schmidt, E. Multidimensional examinations of stuttering children. Problemeund Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 1964, 22, 49–58.Google Scholar
  44. Le Shan, E. J. The only child. New York: Public Affairs Pamphlets, 1960.Google Scholar
  45. Lynn, D. B. Parental and sex role identification. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1969.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. Ordinal position and peer popularity. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 1976, 33(2), 123–131.Google Scholar
  47. Pfeiffer, J. W., & Jones, J. E. Nasa exercise: seeking consensus. Handbook for structuredexperiences for human relations training, Iowa City: University Associates Press, 1969, 69–79.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, B. G., & Sutton-Smith, B. Ordinal position and sex-role identification. GeneticPsychology Monographs, 1964, 70, 297–328.Google Scholar
  49. Rosenberg, B. G., & Sutton-Smith, B. Family interaction effects on masculinity-femininity . Journal of Personality, 1968, 8, 117–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, H. Relationships of ordinal position to affiliation and achievement motives: Directions and generality. Journal of Personality, 1966, 34(4), 467–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rothbart, M. Judgmental heuristics in stereotype formation and maintenance. In R. D. Ashmore (Chair), Cognitive Biases in Stereotyping. Symposium presented at the 85th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, 1977.Google Scholar
  52. Sells, S. B., & Roff, M. Peer acceptance-rejection and birth order. American Psychologist, 1963, 18, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, E. E., & Goodchilds, J. D. Some personality and behavioral factors related to birth order. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1963, 47(5), 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 1977, 35(9), 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snyder, ML, & Swann, W. E. Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social belief to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solomon, E. S., Clare, J. E., & Westoff, C. F. Social and psychological factors affecting fertility. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1956, 34(2), 160–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutton-Smith, B., & Rosenberg, B. G. The sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1970.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, V. D. Family size: Implicit policies and assumed psychological outcomes. Journal of Social Issues, 1974, 30(4), 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tuckman, J., & Regan, R. Size of family and behavioral problems in children. Journal ofGenetic Psychology, 1967, 111(2), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970, Subject Reports: Final Report PC (2)-3A. Women by Number of Children Ever Born. Google Scholar
  61. Vogel, S. R., Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Maternal employment and perception of sex roles among college students. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 39(3), 384–391.Google Scholar
  62. Weisner, T. Technical Report, NIMH, U.S. Public Health Service Grant #lR01MH24947–03.Google Scholar
  63. World Health Organization. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, 6th Revision, Geneva, 1948.Google Scholar
  64. Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, G. B. Birth order and intellectual development. PsychologicalReview, 1975, 82(1), 74–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toni Falbo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations