The Family as a System of Mutual Influences: Parental Beliefs, Distancing Behaviors, and Children’s Representational Thinking

  • Ann V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi
  • Irving E. Sigel
  • James E. Johnson
Part of the Genesis of Behavior book series (GOBE, volume 2)

Abstract

Two major research approaches have been used in investigations of the relationship between family environment and the development of cognitive ability in children. One line of research has related family constellation variables, such as spacing and number of children, to intellectual outcomes, while the second line of research has related measurements of the family environment to intellectual outcomes. An instance of the former type of research is the confluence model (Zajonc & Markus, 1975). Within this model, each additional child in the family is viewed as “diluting” the intellectual environment of the home to a degree depending on the spacing between siblings. The focus of this approach is to predict differences in patterns of family configuration effects found for large samples, rather than to explicate specific interaction patterns in the home environment that could produce such findings.

Keywords

Income Posit Kelly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, W. C., & Krug, R. S. The parent attitude research instrument: A research review. Child Development, 1965, 36, 329–365.Google Scholar
  2. Bee, H. L., Van Egeren, L. F., Streissguth, A. P., Nyman, B. A., & Leckie, M. S. Social class differences in maternal teaching strategies and speech patterns. Development Psychology, 1969, 1, 726–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, R. Q. A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bing, E. Effect of child rearing practices on development of differential cognitive abilities. Child Development, 1963, 34, 631–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, M. Family therapy and family group therapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Group treatment of mental illness (Vol. 12). New York: E. P. Dutton, 1972, p. 213.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, M. Alcholism as viewed through family systems theory and family psychotherapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1974, 233, 115–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brophy, J. E. Mothers as teachers of their own preschool children: The influence of socioeconomic status and task structure on teaching specificity. Child Development 1970, 41, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicirelli, V. G. Mother-child and sibling-sibling interactions on a problem-solving task. Child Development, 1976, 47, 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross, H. J., & Kawash, G. F. A short form PARI to assess authoritarian attitudes toward childrearing. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 91–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. The approval motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  11. Freeberg, N. E., & Payne, D. T. Parental influence on cognitive development in early childhood: A review. Child Development, 1967, 38, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grotevant, H. D., Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. Intellectual development in family constellations with adopted and natural children: A test of the Zajonc and Markus model. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1699–1703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haley, J. Research on family patterns: An instrument measurement. Family Processes, 1964, 3, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children. Child Development, 1965, 36, 869–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, R. Modern systems theory and the family: A confrontation. Social Science Information, 1973, 10, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, P. Home environment and the development of verbal ability. Child Development, 1972, 43, 1081–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelley, H. H. Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, G. A. The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 and 2). New York: Norton, 1955.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, G. A. A theory of personality. New York: Norton, 1963.Google Scholar
  20. Leichter, H. Family as educator. New York: Teachers College Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. The child’s social network: Social object, social functions, and their relationship. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. Marjoribanks, E., & Walberg, H. Mental abilities: Sibling constellation and social class correlates. British Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 1975, 14, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A., & Sigel, I. The effects of spacing and birth order on problem solving competence of preschool children (Progress Report, Grant RO1 H10686–01, NICHHD). Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, July 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Radin, N. Observed maternal behavior with four-year-old boys and girls in lower-class families. Child Development, 1974, 45, 1126–1131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. Intellectual similarities within families of both adopted and biological children. Science, in press.Google Scholar
  26. Sigel, I. E. Language of the disadvantaged: The distancing hypothesis. In C. S. Lavetelli (Ed.), Language training in early childhood education. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  27. Sigel, I. E., & Cocking, R. R. Cognition and Communication: A dialectic paradigm for development. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language: The origins of behavior (Vol. V). New York: Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Sigel, I., Flaugher, J., & Johnson, J. Parent-child interactions observational manual. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. Walberg, H. J., & Marjoribanks, K. Family environment and cognitive development: Twelve analytic models. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 527–551.Google Scholar
  30. Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, G. B. Birth order and intellectual development. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi
    • 1
  • Irving E. Sigel
    • 1
  • James E. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServicePrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations