Advertisement

Ward Management in a Research-Treatment Setting

  • Steven M. Mirin
  • Roger E. Meyer
  • Nancy M. Valentine

Abstract

For those who undertake the treatment of opiate-dependent individuals, continuing challenge and frustration are the rule. Retention of patients in meaningful treatment is challenged by the extreme impulsivity of this client population, their ambivalence about giving up drug use, and the ubiquity of stimuli that trigger drug-seeking behavior. Most drug treatment programs seek to gain some control over patient behavior. Inpatient therapeutic communities have increasingly shown a preference for clients entering treatment as a condition of probation or parole because the dropout rate of voluntary patients is unreasonably high. On the other hand, methadone maintenance programs boast an impressive retention rate because withdrawal from treatment is associated with a prolonged narcotic abstinence syndrome. The required daily dose of methadone serves as a powerful reinforcer in these programs and provides the treatment staff with some measure of control over client behavior.

Keywords

Counseling Session Contingency Contracting Group Contract Contract System Monetary Payment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bursten, B. Decision-making in the hospital community. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 29(6):732–737, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mann, R. A. The behavior-therapeutic use of contingency contracting to control an adult behavior problem: Weight control. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 5:99–109, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stuart, R. B., and Lott, L. A., Jr. Behavioral contracting with delinquents: A cautionary note. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 3:161–69, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dinoff, M., and Rickard, H. C. Learning that privileges entail responsibilities. In: Behavioral Counseling: Cases and Techniques (J. D. Krumboltz and C. E. Thoresen, Eds.). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 1969, pp. 124–129.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broudin, H. M. Contingency contracting as a therapeutic tool in the deceleration of amphetamine use. Behav. Ther. 3:604–08, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glicksman, M., Ottomanelli, G., and Cutler, R. The earn-your-way credit system: Use of a token economy in narcotic rehabilitation. Int. J. Addict. 6(3):525–531, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Brien, J. S., Raynes, A. E., and Patch, V. D. An operant reinforcement system to improve ward behavior in inpatient drug addicts. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 2:239–242, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen, H. I., and Filipsak, J. A New Learning Environment. London: Jossey-Bass, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Premack, D. Toward empirical behavior laws: I. Positive reinforcement. Psychol. Rev. 66:219–33, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Mirin
  • Roger E. Meyer
  • Nancy M. Valentine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations