Advertisement

School Environments

  • Paul V. Gump
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 3)

Abstract

From kindergarten through the twelfth grade, the average young person will spend about 14,000 hours in schools; if preschool and college are added, this can rise to 20,000. This is an awesome amount of time and it is important to recognize that it is not devoted exclusively, some would say not even primarily, to learning of a curriculum. This large portion of young lives goes into living in schools—and we would assume that the quality of this living is an important matter. In the discussion to follow, it is assumed that the quality of child life is very much affected by the quality of the environments they inhabit. We are interested in studies that can tell us something about environmental characteristics and their behavioral and experiential effects.

Keywords

Child Behavior School Environment Subjective Environment Nursery School Small School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R., & Biddle, B. J. Realities of teaching: Explorations with video tape. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. J. Effects of social climate on individual learning. American Educational Research Journal 1970, 1, 135–151.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. The college environment. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, L. L. Big school, small school: A critical examination of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 60, 253–360.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, R. G. Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. Big school, small school. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. Midwest and its children. New York: Harper & Row, 1955. (Reprinted by Hampden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, N. Teaching styles and pupil progress: Do open classrooms really work? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Berk, L. E. Effects of variations in the nursery school setting on environmental constraints and children’s modes of adaption. Child Development, 1971, 42, 839–869.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berk, L. E., & Berson, M. P. The school bus as a deve1opmental experience tor young children. Illinois School Research, 1975, 11(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Berk, L. E., & Lewis, N. G. Sex role and social behavior in four school environments. Elementary School Journal, 1977, 77(3), 205–217.Google Scholar
  12. Bickman, L., Teger, A., Gabrick, T., McLaughlin, C, Berger, M., & Sunaday, E. Dormitory density and helping behavior. Environment and Behavior, 1973, 5, 465–490.Google Scholar
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 513–531.Google Scholar
  14. Brunswik, E. Scope and aspects of the cognition problem. In J. Gruber, R. Jessor, & K. Hammond (Eds.), Cognition: The Colorado symposium. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  15. Charlesworth, R., & Hartup, W. W. Positive social reinforcement in the nursery school peer group. Child Development, 1967, 38, 993–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, B. R. Educating the expert society. San Francisco, Calif.: Chandler, 1962.Google Scholar
  17. Conant, E. Teacher and paraprofessional work productivity. Lefington, Mass.: D C Heath, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Davenport, G. G. The effects of lessons’ signal systems upon the duration and spread of children’s deviance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Dawe, H. C. The influence of size of kindergarten group upon performance. Child Development, 1934, 5, 295–303.Google Scholar
  20. De Vries, D. L., & Edwards, K. J. Learning games and student teams: The effects on classroom process. American Educational Research Journal, 1973, 10, 307–318.Google Scholar
  21. De Vries, D. L., & Edwards, K. J. Student teams and learning games: Their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 741–749.Google Scholar
  22. Doke, L., & Risley, T. The organization of day-care environments: Required vs. optional activities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 405–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Doyle, P. H. The efficacy of the ecological model: A study of the impact of activity settings on the social behavior of preschool children. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1975.Google Scholar
  24. Doyle, W. P. Learning the classroom environment: An ecological analysis of induction into teaching. American Educational Research Association Meeting, New York, 1977. Journal of Teacher Education, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.Google Scholar
  26. Dyck, A. J. The social contacts of some Midwest children with their parents and teachers. In R. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963.Google Scholar
  27. Erickson, F. Some approaches to inquiry in school-community enthography. Anthropology & Education, 1977, 8, 5869.Google Scholar
  28. Fagot, B. I. Variations in density: Effect on task and social behaviors of pre-school children. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 166–167.Google Scholar
  29. Farnsworth, P. R. Seat preference in the classroom. Journal of Social Psychology, 1933, 4, 373–376.Google Scholar
  30. Fisher, C. Educational environments in elementary schools differing in architecture and program openness. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Ill., 1974. Available from author: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1855 Folsom Street, San Francisco, Calif. 94103.Google Scholar
  31. Gage, N. The psychology of teaching methods. Seventy-Fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. Gerst, M. S., & Moos, R. H. The social ecology of university student residences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 513–525.Google Scholar
  33. Goetz, J. P. Behavioral configurations in the classroom: A case study. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1976, 9, 36–49.Google Scholar
  34. Gump, P. V. Intra-setting analysis: The third grade as a special but instructive case. In E. Willems & H. Raush (Eds.), Naturalistic viewpoints in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  35. Gump, P. V. Operating environments in open and traditional schools. School Review, 1974, 84(4), 575–593.Google Scholar
  36. Gump, P. V. The classroom behavior setting: Its nature and relation to student behavior. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Branch, Project NO. 5–0334. Final report; 1967. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  37. Gump, P. V. Ecological psychology and children. In E. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  38. Gump, P. V., & Ross, R. The fit of milieu and programme in school environments. In H. McGurk (Ed.), Ecological factors in human development. New York: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1977a.Google Scholar
  39. Gump, P. V., & Ross, R. What’s happened in schools of open design? Mimeo. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1977b.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, R. V., Delquardi, J., & Harris, J. Opportunity to respond: A new focus in the field of applied behavior analysis. Mimeo. Human Development and Family Life, University of Kansas, 1977.Google Scholar
  41. Harper, L. V., & Sanders, K. M. Preschool children’s use of space: Sex differences in outdoor play. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11 (1), 119.Google Scholar
  42. Hartley, R. F., Frank, L., & Goldenson, R. M. Understanding children’s play. New York: Columbia University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  43. Heilweil, M. The influence of dormitory architecture on resident behavior. Environment and Behavior, 1973, 5, 377–412.Google Scholar
  44. Herndon, J. The way it spozed to he. New York: Bontain, 1968.Google Scholar
  45. Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. P. The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal 1969, 6, 145–167.Google Scholar
  46. Horowitz, F. D., & Paden, L. Y. The effectiveness of environmental intervention programs. In B. M. Caldwell & H. N. Ricciute (Eds.), Review of child development research. Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  47. Houseman, J. An ecological study of interpersonal conflict among preschool children. Unpublished dissertation, Wayne State University, 1972.Google Scholar
  48. Hughes, M. M., & Associates. Assessment of the quality of teaching in elementary schools. Unpublished report, Cooperative Research Project No. 353, Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1959.Google Scholar
  49. Hutt, C., & Vaizey, M. Differential effects of group density on social behavior. Nature, 1966, 209, 1371–1372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Inbar, M. Individual and group effects of enjoyment and learning in a game simulating a community disaster. In S. Boocock & E. Schild (Eds.), Simulation games in learning. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publication, 1968.Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, P. Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  52. Jersild, A. T., & Markey, F. V. Conflicts between pre-school children. Child Development Monographs, 1935, No. 21.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. Learning together and alone. Englewood Clifs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, M. W. The effect on behavior of variations in amount of play equipment. Child Development, 1935, 6, 56–68.Google Scholar
  55. Kelly, J. G. Naturalistic observations in contrasting social environments. In E. Willems & H. Raush (Eds.), Naturalistic viewpoints in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  56. Kelly, J. G. The high school: An exploration of students and social contexts in two Midwestern communities. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
  57. Koneya, M. Location and interaction in row-and-column seating arrangements. Environment and Behavior, 1976, 8(2), 265–282.Google Scholar
  58. Kounin, J. S. Discipline and group management in the classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  59. Kounin, J. S. Some ecological dimensions of school settings. American Educational Research Association Meeting, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  60. Kounin, J. S., & Doyle, P. Degree of continuity of a lessons signal system and the task involvement of children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 159–164.Google Scholar
  61. Kounin, J. S., & Gump, P. V. Signal systems in lesson settings and the task related behavior of preschool children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 554–562.Google Scholar
  62. Kozol, J. Death at an early age. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967.Google Scholar
  63. Krantz, P. J., & Risley, T. R. Behavioral ecology in the classroom. In K. D. O’Leary & S. G. O’Leary (Eds.), Classroom management: The successful use of behavior modification, 2nd Edition. New York: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  64. Lawrenz, F. Student perception of the classroom learning environment in biology, chemistry, and physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 315–323.Google Scholar
  65. LeLaurin, K., & Risley, T. R. The organization of day-care environments: “Zone” versus “man-to-man” staff assignments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 225–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Loo, C. M. The effects of spatial density on the social behavior of children. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1972, 2, 372–381.Google Scholar
  67. McGrew, W. C. Interpersonal spacing of preschool children. In J. S. Bruner & K. J. Connolly (Eds.), The development of competence in early childhood. London: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  68. McPherson, G. Small town teacher. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  69. Metropolitan Toronto School Board. Study of educational facilities. (Annotated bibliography of research on open schools). Toronto: Metropolitan Toronto School Board, 1974.Google Scholar
  70. Miller, L. B., & Dyer, J. L. Four preschool programs: Their dimensions and effects. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1975, No. 162.Google Scholar
  71. Montes, F., & Risley, T. R. Evaluating traditional day care practices: An empirical approach. Child Care Quarterly, 1975, 4, 208–215.Google Scholar
  72. Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. Classroom environmental scale manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  73. Moos, R. H., Van Dort, B., Smail, P., & De Young, A. J. A typology of university student living groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 359–367.Google Scholar
  74. Myers, D. Why open education died. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1974, 8(1), 60–71.Google Scholar
  75. O’Conner, M. The nursery school environment. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 556–561.Google Scholar
  76. Pace, C. R., & Baird, L. Attainment patterns in the environmental press of college subcultures. In T. Newcomb & E. Wilson (Eds.), College peer groups. Chicago: Aldine, 1966.Google Scholar
  77. Pace, C. R., & Stern, G. G. An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958, 49, 269–277.Google Scholar
  78. Parsons, T. The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in society. Harvard Educational Review, 1955, 29, 297–318.Google Scholar
  79. Prescott, E. Who thrives in group daycare? Pacific Oaks College, 714 W. California Blvd., Pasadena, Calif. 91105. 1973. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  80. Quilitch, H. R., Christophersen, E. R., & Risley, T. R. The evaluation of children’s play materials. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 501–502.Google Scholar
  81. Raven, J. C. Raven’s coloured progressive matrices. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1962.Google Scholar
  82. Risley, T. R. The ecology of applied behavior analysis. In A. Rogers-Warren & S. Warren (Eds.), Ecological perspectives in behavioral analyses. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  83. Rist, R. C. The urban school: A factory for failure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  84. Rogers-Warren, A. Planned change: Ecobehaviorally based interventions. In A. Rogers-Warren & S. Warren (Eds.), Ecological perspectives in behavioral analyses. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  85. Rohe, W. M., & Nuffer, E. L. The effects of density and partitioning on children’s behavior. Presented at the 85th meeting of A.P.A. San Francisco, Calif., 1977. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  86. Rosenthal, B. An ecological study of free play in a nursery school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State Unversity, 1973.Google Scholar
  87. Sanders, K. M., & Harper, L. V. Free play fantasy behavior in pre-school children: Relations among gender, age, season, and location. Child Development, 1976, 47, 1182–1185.Google Scholar
  88. Schoggen, P. Environmental forces in the everyday lives of children. In R. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963.Google Scholar
  89. Schoggen, P. An ecological study of children with physical disabilities in school and at home. In R. Weinberg & F. Wood (Eds.), Observation of pupils and teachers in mainstream and special education settings: Alternative strategies. Minneapolis: Leadership Training Institute, University of Minnesota, 1975.Google Scholar
  90. Seidner, C. J. Teaching with simulations and games. In N. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods. Seventy-Fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  91. Sherman, L. An ecological study of glee in small groups of preschool children. Child Development, 1975, 46, 53–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Shure, M. B. Psychological ecology of a nursery school. Child Development, 1963, 34, 979–992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, L. M., & Goeffrey, W. The complexities of an urban classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, P. Aspects of the playgroup environment. In D. Canter & T. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference: Psychology and the built environment. London: Architectural Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  95. Sommer, R. Classroom ecology. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1967, 3, 489–503.Google Scholar
  96. Stallings, J. Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow-Through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1975, 40(7–8).Google Scholar
  97. Steele, J. M., House, E. R., & Kerins, T. An instrument for assessing instructional climate through low inference student judgments. American Educational Research Journal, 1971, 8, 447–466.Google Scholar
  98. Stevens, R. The question as a measure of efficiency in instruction: A critical study of classroom practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, 1912, No. 48.Google Scholar
  99. Swift, J. W. Effects of early group experience: The nursery school and day nursery. In M. Hoffman & I. Hoffman (Eds.), Child development research. Vol 1 New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.Google Scholar
  100. Traub, R. E., Weiss, J., Fisher, C. W., & Musella, D. Closure on openness: Describing and quantifying open education. Interchange, 1974, 3, 69–84.Google Scholar
  101. Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 93–102.Google Scholar
  102. Van der Ryn, S., & Silverstein, M. Dorms at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Planning and Development Research, 1967.Google Scholar
  103. Wahlberg, H. J. Social environment as a mediator of classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 6, 529–542.Google Scholar
  104. Wahlberg, H. J. Psychology of learning environments: Behavioral, structural, or perceptual? In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education. Vol. 4. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, in press.Google Scholar
  105. Wahlberg, H. J., & Ahlgren, A. Predictors of the social environment of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 1970, 7, 153–167.Google Scholar
  106. Wheeler, R. C., & Ryan, F. L. Effects of cooperative and competitive classroom environments on the attitudes and achievement of elementary school students engaged in social studies inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 402–407.Google Scholar
  107. Wicker, A. W. Undermanning, performances, and students’ subjective experiences in behavior settings of large and small high schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 255–261.Google Scholar
  108. Wilcox, B. L., & Holahan, C. Social ecology of the megadorm in university student housing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68(4), 453–458.Google Scholar
  109. Willems, E. P. Participation in behavior setting in relation to three variables: Size of behavior settings, marginality of persons, and sensitivity to audiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1965.Google Scholar
  110. Willems, E. P. Sense of obligation to high school activities as related to school size and marginality of student. Child Development, 1967, 38, 1247–1260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Wolcott, H. The man in the principals office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  112. Wolcott, H. (Ed.) Ethnography of schooling. Human Organization, 1975, 34(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  113. Wright, H. F., Barker, R. G., Null, J., & Schoggen, P. Toward a psychological ecology of the classroom. In A. Coladarci (Ed.), Readings in educational psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1955.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul V. Gump
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations