Advertisement

The Impact of the Work of Piaget on Science Curriculum Development

  • Kenneth Lovell
  • Michael Shayer

Abstract

The Piagetian model of cognitive development involves a description of the growth of human thinking under certain conditions. The rate of development along the dimension sketched out by Piaget seems to depend upon the culture pattern in which the individual is reared and the quality of schooling. We recognize, of course, that the extent of the development will also depend upon the genetic make-up of the individual, in the sense that genetics will play a role in determining the extent to which he can develop those skills said to be indicative of intelligence in his culture pattern.

Keywords

Propositional Logic Science Curriculum Operational Thought Australian Science Education Project Conceptual Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archenhold, W. F., A study of the understanding of the concept of potential in sixth form students. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  2. ASEP, 1974. A guide to ASEP. Melbourne: Australian Science Education Project.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madeus, G. F., 1971. Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, T. W., Weber, M. C., and Renner, J. R. 1975. Research on the development of scientific literacy. Science and children, January.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, M., and Scribner, S. 1974. Culture and thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Driver, R., 1973. The representation of conceptual frameworks in young adolescent science students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  7. Hooper, F., and Dihoff, R. E., 1975. Multidimensional scaling of Piagetian task performance. Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Centre for Cognitive Learning.Google Scholar
  8. Hooper, F., and Sipple, T. S., 1975. An investigation of matrix task classificatory and seriation abilities. Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Centre for Cognitive Learning.Google Scholar
  9. Ingle, R. B., and Shayer, M., 1971. Conceptual demands in Nuffield O-level chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 8, 182–83.Google Scholar
  10. Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J., 1958. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J., 1964. The early growth of logic in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Karplus, R., 1973. Opportunities for concrete and formal thinking in science tasks. Paper given at the third annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  13. Karplus, R., 1975. Proportional reasoning and control of variables in seven countries. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science.Google Scholar
  14. Karplus, R., and Thier, H. D., 1967. A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn, D., and Brannock, J., 1977. Development of the isolation of variables scheme in experimental and “natural experiment” contexts. Developmental Psychology, 13, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lévi-Strauss, C., 1966. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Luria, A. R., 1966. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Luria, A. R., 1976. Cognitive development. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Metalon, B., 1962. Étude génétique de l’implication. In E. W. Beth et al., Implication, formalisation et logique naturelle: Etudes d’épistémologie génétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 16, 69–93.Google Scholar
  20. O’Brien, T. C., 1972. Logical thinking in adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4, 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Papert, S., 1963. Sur la logique Piagétianne. Etudes d’épistémologie génétique, 15, 107–129.Google Scholar
  22. Piaget, J., 1960. The general problems of the psychobiological development of the child. In J. M. Tanner and B. Inhelder (Eds.), Discussions on child development (Vol. 4). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Piaget, J., 1970. Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Piaget, J., 1971. Structuralism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Piaget, J., and Garcia, R., 1975. Understanding causality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, J., 1967. The development of the concept of mathematical proof in grammar school pupils. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham. Science 5–13, 1972. With objectives in mind. London: Macdonald Educational.Google Scholar
  27. SCIS, 1974. SCIS Teachers’ Handbook. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science.Google Scholar
  28. SCIS, 1976. SCIS Final Report. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science.Google Scholar
  29. Shapiro, B. J., and O’Brien, T. C., 1970. Logical thinking in children aged six through thirteen. Child Development, 41, 823–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shayer, M., 1972a. Piaget’s work and science teaching. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  31. Shayer, M., 1972b. Conceptual demands in Nuffield O-level physics. School Science Review, 186, 26–34.Google Scholar
  32. Shayer, M., 1974. Conceptual demands in Nuffield O-level biology course. School Science Review, 56, No. 195, 381–388.Google Scholar
  33. Shayer, M., 1978. The analysis of science curricula for Piagetian level of demand. Studies in Science Education, 5, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shayer, M., Küchemann, D. E., and VVylam, H., 1976. The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stake, R. E., et al. 1978. Final report on case studies in science education. (NSF Project C7621134).Google Scholar
  36. Tulkin, S. R., and Konner, M. J., 1973. Alternative conceptions of intellectual functioning. Human Development, 16, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wason, P. C., and Johnson-Laird, P. N., 1972. Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Lovell
    • 1
  • Michael Shayer
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of LeedsLeedsEngland
  2. 2.Chelsea CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations