Advertisement

Data Analysis of Four X-Chromosome Inactivation Experiments

  • Victor E. Kane
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 12)

Abstract

Some experiments on mosaics result in data that suggest one or more developmental models usually consisting of alternative biological processes having several unknown parameters. If each experimental subject responded in an identical fashion, a mathematical formulation might be appropriate. However, since random fluctuations are often inherent in the developmental system, a statistical model incorporating randomness is necessary. This paper presents the biological assumptions and a developmental model which appear to be used in data analysis of four experiments (Nesbitt 1971; Fialkow 1973; Nance 1964; and Migeon 1971). The simplest statistical estimation scheme is presented here; complete details are given elsewhere (Kane 1975). The emphasis is on the results of the parameter estimates and on hypothesis testing in the four experiments.

Keywords

Cell Pool Moment Estimator Binomial Sampling Biological Assumption Organ Determination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cattanach, B. M. 1961. A chemically-induced variegation-type position effect in the mouse. Z. Vererbungslehre 92: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fialkow, P. J. 1973. Primordial cell pool size and lineage relationships of five human cell types. Ann. of Human Genet. 37: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kane, V. E. 1975. Statistical models for X chromosome inactiva-tion. Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida State University.Google Scholar
  4. Kane, V. E. 1978. Stochastic models for X chromosome inactivation. Submitted.Google Scholar
  5. Migeon, B. R. 1971. Studies of skin fibroblasts from 10 families with HGPRT deficiency, with reference to X-chromosome inactivation. Am. J. of Human Genet. 23: 199–210.Google Scholar
  6. Nance, W. E. 1964. Genetic tests with sex-linked marker: glu-cose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. on Quant. Biol. 29: 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nesbitt, M. N. 1970. X chromosome inactivation mosaicism in the mouse. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  8. Nesbitt, M. N. 1971. X chromosome inactivation mosaicism in the mouse. Develop. Biol. 26: 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nesbitt, M. N. 1972. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. Nesbitt, M. N. and Gartler, S. M. 1970. Replication of the mouse sex chromosome early in the S period. Cytogenet. 9: 212–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor E. Kane
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematics and Statistics Research Department, Computer Sciences Division, Nuclear DivisionUnion Carbide CorporationOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations