Skip to main content

Combinatorial and Computer Analysis of Random Mosaics

  • Chapter
Genetic Mosaics and Chimeras in Mammals

Part of the book series: Basic Life Sciences ((BLSC,volume 12))

Abstract

Mosaics are arrays of two or more alternatives which may be in one, two, or three dimensions, and for each of which there are many biological examples. Before we can discuss the biological material intelligently, it is essential to determine some of the parameters of purely random mosaics. The most obvious attributes of mosaics are patchiness, and the variation in patchiness. I shall use the terms run, patch, and cluster to describe aggregates of like cells in one-, two-, and three-dimensional mosaics, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Feder, N. 1976. Solitary cells and enzyme exchange in tetrapa-rental mice. Nature 263: 67–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. L. 1968. Mouse chimaeras obtained by the injection of cells into the blastocyst. Nature 220: 596–597.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, M. F. 1970. Genetic activity of sex chromosomes in somatic cells of mammals. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B. 259: 41–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, B. 1971. Clonal basis of mammalian differentiation. Control mechanisms of growth and differentiation. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 25: 345–370.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, M. W. 1974. Chimerics vs. X inactivation mosaics: significance of differences in pigment distribution. Develop. Biol. 58: 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, S. A. 1968. The Theory of Random Clumping. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W. L. 1939. Distribution of groups in a sequence of alternatives. Ann. Eugenics 9: 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. W. 1948. On Growth and Form. 2nd ed. McMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegmann, T. G. 1970. Enzyme patterns in tetraparental mouse liver. Nature 225: 462–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J. D. 1975. A theoretical approach to the relation between patch size and clone size in chimeric tissue. J. Theor. Biol. 50: 153–160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, T. G. and D. Gingell. 1970. Striping and the pattern of melanocyte cells in chimaeric mice. J. Theor. Biol. 29: 147–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of the late Robert S. Rupp whose perseverance and keen three-dimensional insight made this study possible.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitten, W.K. (1978). Combinatorial and Computer Analysis of Random Mosaics. In: Russell, L.B. (eds) Genetic Mosaics and Chimeras in Mammals. Basic Life Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3390-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3390-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3392-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3390-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics