Advertisement

Evidence from Mutable Genes Concerning the Origin of the Germ Line

  • A. G. Searle
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 12)

Abstract

In recent years, studies on aggregation and injection chimaeras and on the genetic mosaics that result from X-chromosomal inactivation have done a great deal to elucidate what goes on in the early stages of mammalian development. Other kinds of genetic mosaic, namely those arising through forward and reverse mutation at particular loci, can also provide useful information. This is particularly so because the initial mutational event in these mosaics can occur at different stages in development, from the first cleavage division on, and can therefore provide us with a sort of running commentary on developmental processes; whereas the initiating events with respect to X-chromosome inactivation and the formation of chimeras are limited to very early stages in embryogenesis. Another point which may be of importance is that there would seem to be much less chance of preferential proliferation of one of the clonal components of such a mosaic than in most chimeras. In these mosaics, the genetic difference between the clones normally involves two viable alleles at a single locus controlling some aspect of coat colour. In chimeras, however, there are usually many genetic differences between the components.

Keywords

Germ Line Coat Colour Primordial Germ Cell Reversion Frequency Embryonic Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cattanach, B. M. and J. H. Isaacson. 1967. Controlling elements in the mouse X chromosome. Genetics 57: 331–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gardner, R. L. 1968. Mouse chimaeras obtained by the injection of cells into the blastocyst. Nature 220: 596–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham, C. F. 1971. The design of the mouse blastocyst. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 25: 371–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewis, J. H., D. Summerbell and L. Wolpert. 1972. Chimaeras and cell lineage in development. Nature 239: 276–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Markert, C. L. and W. K. Silvers. 1956. The effects of genotype and cell environment on melanoblast differentiation in the house mouse. Genetics 41: 429–450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McLaren, A. 1972. Numerology of development. Nature 239: 274–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Melvold, R. W. 1971. Spontaneous somatic reversion in mice: effects of parental genotype on stability at the p-locus. Mutation Res. 12: 171–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Melvold, R. W. 1972. Factors affecting the spontaneous somatic reversion of pink-eyed unstable in the mouse. Unpublished Ms.Google Scholar
  9. Melvold, R. W. 1977. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. Mintz, B. 1967. Gene control of mammalian pigmentary differentiation. I. Clonal origin of melanocytes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. 58: 344–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mintz, B. 1974. Gene control of mammalian differentiation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 8: 411–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell, L. B. 1964. Genetic and functional mosaicism in the mouse. In Role of Chromosomes in Development, pp. 153–181. (Michael Locke, Ed.) Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, L. B. and M. H. Major. 1956. A high rate of somatic reversion in the mouse. Genetics 41: 658 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  14. Russell, L. B. and M. H. Major. 1957. Radiation-induced presumed somatic mutations in the house mouse. Genetics 42: 161–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Russell, W. L. 1951. X-ray-induced mutations in mice. Cold Spring Harbour Symp. Quant. Biol. 16: 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaible, R. H. and J. W. Gowen. 1960. Delimitation of coat pigment areas in mosaic and piebald mice. Rec. Genet. Soc. Amer. 29: 92.Google Scholar
  17. Searle, A. G. 1977. The use of pigment loci for detecting reverse mutations in somatic cells of mice. Arch. Toxicol. 38: 105–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. West, J. D. 1976. Clonal development of the retinal epithelium in mouse chimaeras and X-inactivation mosaics. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 35: 445–461.Google Scholar
  19. Wolfe, H. G. 1963. Two unusual mutations affecting pigmentation in the mouse. In Genetics Today, Vol. 1, p. 251. (S. J. Geerts, Ed.) Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Searle
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Research Council Radiobiology UnitHarwell, Didcot, Oxon.England

Personalised recommendations