Advertisement

Reward Training: Latent Learning

  • M. E. Rashotte
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 19)

Abstract

Reward training has provided a forum for many developments in associative learning theory. The present chapter is the first of three which summarize the major empirical phenomena and theoretical advances derived from the study of latent learning, contrast effects and extinction. These developments have helped our thinking evolve to its current status about the functions of the reward event (Sv) and about the nature of associative processes in reward training.

Keywords

Associative Strength Choice Point Reinforcement Theory Expectancy Theory Habit Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, T. W. Properties of compound stimuli and their conditioned components. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blodgett, H. C. The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 1929, 4, 113–134.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968, 11, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deutsch, J. A. The inadequacy of the Hullian derivations of reasoning and latent learning. Psychological Review, 1956, 63, 389–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gengerelli, J. A. Preliminary experiments on the causal factors in animal learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1928, 8, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haney, G. W. The effect of familiarity on maze performance of albino rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 1931, 4, 319–333.Google Scholar
  7. Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. Theories of Learning, 4th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Hull, C. L. Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. Psychological Review, 1930, 37, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hull, C. L. Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 1931, 38, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hull, C. L. Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.Google Scholar
  11. Hull, C. L. A Behavior System: An Introduction to Behavior Theory Concerning The Individual Organism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  12. Karn, H. K., & Porter, J. M. The effect of certain pretraining procedures upon maze performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1946, 36, 461–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. Edward C. Tolman. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, Jr., W. N. Schoenfeld, & W. S. Verplanck (Eds.), Modern Learning Theory: A Critical Analysis of Five Examples. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1954.Google Scholar
  14. Meehl, P. E., & MacCorquodale, K. A further study of latent learning in the T-maze. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1948, 41, 372–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, N. E. A reply to “sign-gestalt or conditioned reflex?” Psychological Review, 1935, 42, 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moltz, H. Latent extinction and the fractional anticipatory response mechanism. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 229–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore, B. R. The role of directed Pavlovian reactions in simple instrumental learning in the pigeon. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Constraints on Learning. London: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Rashotte, M. E., Griffin, R. W., & Sisk, C. L. Second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977, 5, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Razran, G. Empirical codifications and specific theoretical implications of compound-stimulus conditioning: Perception. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical Conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1975.Google Scholar
  20. Seward, J. P. An experimental analysis of latent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 34, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seward, J. P., & Levy, H. Latent extinction: Sign learning as a factor in extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 660–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spence, K. W. Behavior Theory and Conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spence, K. W., Bergmann, G., & Lippitt, R. A study of simple learning under irrelevant motivational-reward conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950, 40, 539–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spence, K. W., & Lippitt, R. O. “Latent” learning of a simple maze problem with relevant needs satiated. Psychological Bulletin, 1940, 37, 429.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, K. W., & Lippitt, R. An experimental test of the sign-Gestalt theory of trial-and-error learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1946, 36, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thistlethwaite, D. A critical review of latent learning and related experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 1951, 48, 97–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thorndike, E. L. Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. New York: Macmillan, 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thorndike, E. L. Fundamentals of Learning. New York: Teachers College, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tolman, E. C. Purposive Behavior in Animals and Man. New York: Century, 1932.Google Scholar
  30. Tolman, E. C. Sign-Gestalt or conditioned reflex? Psychological Review, 1933, 40, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 1948, 55, 189–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tolman, E. C., & Gleitman, H. Studies in learning and motivation: I. Equal reinforcements in both end-boxes, followed by shock in one end-box. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 810–819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, L. H. Introduction and removal of reward and maze performance in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 1930, 4, 241–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Rashotte
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations